Are Clinton's comments on Iran appropriate?
[cnn-photo-caption image= http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/05/05/art.clinton.lafayette.ap.jpg caption=" Obama says Clinton scolded him about Iran before."]
FROM CNN's Jack Cafferty:
Hillary Clinton sounds too much like President Bush. That's Barack Obama's take on Clinton's threat to "totally obliterate" Iran if it attacks Israel.
Clinton initially made the comments a couple weeks ago, saying: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran. In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
Obama says this isn't the language we need right now. He says it's too similar to the kinds of things President Bush says, what Obama calls "bluster and saber rattling." Obama says Clinton is changing the rules right before an election. He said she scolded him about Iran before, saying "we shouldn't speculate about Iran, we've got to be cautious when we're running for president."
Clinton's not backing away from her comment. She says she wants to make it "abundantly clear" to Iran that if they attacked our ally Israel, they would face a "tremendous cost." However, Clinton adds that "nobody wants to go to war with Iran." She refuses to say whether she would order a nuclear response.
Here’s my question to you: Is Hillary Clinton’s comment that the U.S. could “obliterate” Iran if it attacked Israel with nuclear weapons appropriate?
Interested to know which ones made it on air?
Bob from Charlotte, N.C. writes:
Jack, I'm so beyond caring whether anything that comes out of that woman’s mouth is appropriate, true, honest, or worth my time to even listen to. She has and will say anything to try to steal this election. Appropriateness or truth have no meaning to her.
Robert from Fayetteville, Arkansas writes:
How many Americans does she put at risk by saying something so reckless?
Anthony from Worcester, Massachusetts writes:
Senator Clinton’s comments are absolutely appropriate. All the candidates have said an attack on Israel is tantamount to an attack on the United States. We need a president who will fight back and protect both Israel and the United States, not one who thinks just talking with Ahmadinejad will make everything okay.
Anne from Seattle writes:
I'm no fan of Hillary, but I was shocked at the stupidity of her remarks. She seems to be adopting Bush's cowboy politics and that is scary. Bush's administration has hurt our international ties and status. I don't want another president who makes decisions before consulting with advisers at home or our allies around the world. This irresponsible language is so much more damaging than anything in the Reverend Wright debacle.
Phil from Ashburn, Virginia writes:
Inappropriate and unwanted. She could have said that America will protect our friends and strongly react with all available options. Using words like that sounds like bullying.
Larry from Florida writes:
What’s to think about? We need to stand with our allies. They nuke our friends, we retaliate. That’s not war mongering! That’s common sense. It seems talking to Iran is like talking to the wall. No one hears it.
Annie from Atlanta writes:
She's using the fear card right out of the Republican playbook, taking pandering to new places. I expected more from her.
@jackcafferty on Twitter
Hillary say anything to get elected.. Next thing you know she will be
wanting to keep the troops in Irag. She starting to sound like George Bush & McCain.. She would be a good V.P. candidate for John McCAIN
She speaks the truth so, what's the problem?
Absolutely not! Hillary's world war scenario must be avoided. I voted for her in March in Texas, but I changed my mind about her on this very comment alone. She no longer has my vote.
No! The idea that we are the bully of the world, needs to end. This started with President Bush and his pre-emptive strike policy and look where that has gotten us. We do not need to build on our mistakes, we need to learn from them.
Jack,
I'm an Obama supporter, but Hillary's comments are in many ways true. We could obliterate Iran's infrastructure and architecture with a simple phone call. People shouldn't be surprised that the Pentagon probably has dozens of plans on how to do it. Where she goes absolutely wrong is in her approach. She seems unlikely to even consider serious talks, or even other options. All one has to do is listen her speeches and plans with a little bit of intellect. She speaks in bumper stickers. She's easily influenced and insecure, it's why she voted for the Iraq war. Now make her president and mix in favors she owns to all the big money donors she'll owe favors to, it's a catastrophe waiting to happen. For someone who is married to a former president and flaunts some kind of experience from being around in the White House, she isn't showing very much leadership potential.
Of Course Jack she is trying any and everything to scare up votes that is what Republicans do, Oh wait she is not a Republican YET!
No. It is another bushism.
The comments Hillary made concerning Iran were totally inappropriate. It is bad enough to have a president who refuses to negoitate or talk to our enemies – you can't solve a problem by ruffling your feathers, posturing, and flexing your muscles, you need to talk things out and THEN take the most appropriate action. Hillary's threat to "obliterate" an entire country, including it's innocent citizens, shows a total lack of intelligence, compassion, and the understaning necessary to be the Commander in Chief. Heaven help us!
Jack,
I agree with every word that Senator Clinton says on her stand with Iran if they were to harm Israel. Iran is not our friend and they absolutely need to know where we stand if they tried to harm Israel. What concerns me is that Senator Obama is against this. Has anyone told Senator Obama that Iran is very dangerous and that Iran is not America's friend and they would like nothing more than to hurt America?
Joe
A person can be strong, without being a bully. Hillary was being a bully. We've had eight years of a bully – and nothing good has come from it.
What will come from Hillary's mouth next? "You're either with us...or against us."?
No, it is completely INAPPROPRIATE! I think she sounds like Dick Cheney. What was she thinking? The last thing we need right now is incinerary comments like that. We need the calm voice of reason which is what Obama presents. He was right about the war in Iraq when Clinton voted for it. She refused to take responsibility for that vote and would not call it the mistake it was. Why should we trust her now? She is throwing gasoline on a fire.
It probable didn't win her any points with the Iranian people but it was a big hit here in America. Sometimes the truth hurts. The real facts are if Iran launched any type of nuclear device against Israel then Israel would take out Iran in a heart beat long before we found out about it here in America. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is playing with fire threatening Israel and is risking the lives of his countrymen by doing it. Right now the biggest difference between Iran and the United States is that The United States can back up what Hillary Clinton said. The United States not only walks tall but we carry a big stick and Iran would be nothing more then a pinyata if they ever used a nuclear weapon against us or our allies.
They are still important, but not for the reason you are thinking. They are important because if he wins the next few state it just might be enough to convince Hillary to stop debilitating the Democratic party and allow it to mount an effective campaign against Mc Same. He hasn’t even been running and holds a small lead over both candidates! Democrats need to be fighting against the probabability of another 4 years of Bush, not eachother.
Jack although there will be massive retaliation against Iran in the event of any attack on Israel it was not necessary to use the word obliterate, senator Clinton cried foul when Obama said if we have actionable intelligence on Osama Biladen inside the territories of Pakistan,and the Pakistani government fail to take action America will take action inside Pakistan now senator Clinton is this how she apply her "EXPERIENCE"
Of course it isn't. If Obama had said the same thing, she would be outraged that he used such strong, provocative language and we would endlessly be hearing about his inexpirience. What would Hillary be saying if Iran had suggested obliterating the United States? Can she say anything that doesn't have some form of hate or anger woven through it? Why is she always so angry? A Hillary presidency would invite Gridlock, partisanism, and the blame game like we haven't seen since, well since President Bush took office.
Absolutely not. How different would this of been viewed if someone running for the presidency of Iran said the same thing? Hillary needs to understand that Iran is an important ally in stabilizing Iraq. Why would she try to burn bridges before she is even elected. This is why I will not vote for her. She says things without thinking just to get elected. Obama is more thoughtful and insightful when it comes to these matters. Of course, we will not stand by and watch Iran bomb Israel, but we do not need to degrade or provoke them. To me what she said sounds prideful and in a world where America is already struggling with our place in the world, this is the last thing we need.
It is scary when politicians use this kind of language about killing other humans. It is hard to reconcile the personality of someone who can "feel the pain" of the working class and discusses obliterating countries. Even Hillary knows this was a misspeak which is why she won't repeat it when questioned.
I don't know how appropriate they may have been, I do believe they seem just a bit pre-mature. Even though I understood what she was trying to convey, I just don't know how she can say since you don't know what conditions could exsist when and if something like that happens. It is my prayer that we will never come to a situation like that.
Jack, I think they are right on the money. Hillary has the answers to the problems in this country. At least she speaks up and is willing to be tough in these situations we need this kind of leader.
Dorothy Lucasville, Ohio
It's not helpful to have Sen. Clinton saber rattling at Iran right this minute. George Bush is going to start a war with Iran in a very short time. He's laid the ground work for this war by simply having a fleet of U.S. Navy ships laying off the coast & watching the Iran's speed boats coming out to harass those ships. Someone is going to make a mistake soon. Either Iran will try & bomb a ship or a U.S. ship will sink a few of Iran's speed boats & the next you know we're at war with Iran & while we may win the war, we will lose whatever friends we might have had before Bush started this mess.
Inapproropriate from any other candidate, just another outrageous and laughable comment coming from Hillary.
The words Clinton chose are inappropriate. In a time where we need to tone down our war-seeking image we should be using more diplomatic rhetoric. No one denies that we need to be clear and firm with Iran, but we do not need to act like a bully using words like what Clinton chose.
Jack, it depends on what she is trying to achieve with it. If it's a stunt to make her look tough without regard for the effect these comments have on Middle East relations and global stability, it is completely inappropriate.
However, if she's merely wanting to grab headlines, pander to warhawks, inflate diplomatic uncertainty and consequently the price of oil – then it's Mission Accomplished.
I thought we had all had enough of the arrogant, 'shoot-em up' cowboy tough talk.
Sadie
Biloxi, MS
Jackzilla, the fact is we could turn Iran into a parking lot, in short order.
We have seen our Government talk itself into a corner before, and it usually isn't pretty. I for one would like to see our next president [Barack], walk softly, but carry a big stick.
NO the comments were not appropriate!! The last thing this country needs is more of Bush's COWBOY politics. These type of comments only make it harder for the U.S. to get along with other countries. Sen. Clinton ONCE said war should be the last choice and now she says she would obliterate another country!! We need someone who can take our country back to the GREAT, PROUD, STRONG country it once was and comments like this does not do that!!
Jack,
It is extremely inappropriate for a potential Head of State to be discussing the obliteration of a foreign country in hypothetical terms. It shows a recklesness and disregard for diplomacy that we have clearly been missing the last seven years. On top of that, instability and uncertainty in the Middle East causes havoc on our gasoline prices. Hillary is hitting two birds with one stone by simultaneously worsening both our hard pressed economic situation and international relations. One need only look at the reactions from around the world to see the ridiculousness in these statements.
The choice of words may be blunt but their point was certainly received loud and clear.
Hillary's threats are just more saber rattling and fear tactics. Will this national nightmare ever end.? Our only hope is the election of the reasonable and cool headed Obama.
Her comment is unprofessional, inappropriate and frankly
un-presidential. It contradicts her position that if elected she would work to improve American's image in the World. It sounds like George Bush "cowboy" diplomacy... I think it is clear that does not work very well !
Jack,
Neither Democrat wants to look weak on issues of national security, especially when looking at running against John McBush for the Presidency, it is the one area that he can trump both Obama and Clinton. The problem is that talk like this can be misinterpreted in Iran as a threat to them, and we know their government is not above putting a spin on this kind of statement. Interestingly America went to war with Iraq for less direct threats to the United States than the one this statement from Clinton represents to Iran.
I might have chosen my words a little more carefully. The Iranians certainly heard the message and most likely will step up their efforts to mount an attack on us now that we have threatened them. We could take the approach of talking about this in open terms rather that threaten a coming nuclear power. While I agree, sort of, with the content it is not going to get us anywhere or change anything towards the better.
I was appalled by this remark. The thought that she so easily, casually really, threatens a genocide, an all out obliteration of an entire country, every man, woman, and child, is horrifying. And more horrifying yet is the fact that the media would rather concern themselves with Rev. Wright. Truthfully, I don't know who scares me more, Hillary, the media, or people willing to vote for Hillary (or McCain for that matter.)
Considering, that talk like that is what Bush and Cheney used to get the authorization to invade Iraq, authorization that Hillary signed off on without reading any of the intelligence, I'd say it's right up her alley! She is a candidate who will say anything and do anything to get a vote. I'm just wondering who it is she's trying to convince, the republicans or the democrats?
Yes, it shows that she is stronger that Obama on National security.
No. It's one thing to be clear on where we stand, it's another to start implying that we'll nuke another country and completely wipe them out. Very irresponsible and Bush-like. Then we wonder why other countries don't like us!
Roanoke, VA
Yes, she sounds very Bush like. Iraq is a lost cause and she thinks she can obliterate Iran. Good luck with that idea.
In support of our long-standing alliance with Israel, Clinton's comment was entirely appropriate. In her quest for votes from generations of Americans who have largely avoided military service and believe that we can discuss and hug our way to world peace, it was too much raw truth.
Jack. Sure they are appropriate, if you are a right wing republican named George W. Bush and you operate under "cowboy diplomacy."
But anything to get elected I guess.
Aw, Come on, Jack ! all's fair in love and..... politics ! You know that.
She is trying to impart to voters a strong position not only on Israel but also her strength of spirit re: American and the Western World.
We must not show Iran any form of shilly shally wishy washy attitudes re: nuclear weapons and threats. I believe Senator clinton is prepared to talk with iran when the time comes.
All states and all votes are important to our democratic system. I hope voters get off the Reverend Wright issue and focus on a more important issue – Hilary's remark, "if Iran bombs Israel she will obliterate Iran". Wow! Is this the person who says she'll bring our troops home from Iraq! For What? To send them off to Iran in a year or two? I find this very scary. Not only does she want to be the first
woman President but to be Commander and Chief over another war!
Think about THAT voters. Ruth I. Kern Phoenix, Arizona
Why be wishy washy? We are not playing games here when it comes to pretecting Israel who is one of our staunchest allies, and our own global interest, so what she said is very appropiate. One reason is because that is exactly what we would do, and the second reason that is exactly what we should do. Obama said it would be wrong, but he offered no other solution...
As an Iranian-American and avid Clinton supporter, I am quite confident that President Hillary Clinton would never engage Iran without first negotiation and compromise. Unlike our current administration, she would intelligently and thoughtfully ponder the dire consequences of war (for us and for the innocent citizens of Iran).
By the way, Jack, I strongly believe that, unlike Fox News and MSNBC, CNN is the only fair and balanced network. It is so refreshing to watch news anchors who refrain from taking sides in this election.
CTG (Cyrus the Great)!!
Tampa, Florida
In a youtube world media filled with an infinite of 5 second clip reruns, almost everything is going to be taken out of proportion. As a matter of fact there's a few already out.
Again it will be one of the most remembered statements recorded in history.
This will go down in history right next to John McCain's 100 -1,000 year war statement or his going opening the Gates of Hell. Along with Bill Clinton's I had no relations with that woman.
I thought diplomacy left out ultimatums. If I remember right, ultimatums is what got us into the WWII.
I think her comment shows two things, One, she is highly combative and would rather exacerbate a bad situation than negotiate. Two, she has made a huge mistake, tarnishing America's image and it will likely cause more problems than not. I question her intelligence on this matter.
What's to think about? We need to stand with our allies. They nuke our freinds, we retaliate. Thats not war mongering! Thats common sense. It seems talking to Iran is like talking to the wall. No one hears it.
Larry in Florida
NO. This kind of talk is not helpful to working towards peace in the world. Even the UN condemns what she said. This type of talk puts her in the same category as George Bush's style of cowboy antics. She should know better, but is so busy pandering she can't get herself out of the mud. I am so disappointed in her.
Hillary's comment regarding an American respone in the event of an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel is most certainly appropriate. What's Senator Obama's response going to be if such a catastrophy were to occur: To sit down and have milk and cookies with the Iranians?
I would imagine that next week, she will say that she misspoke. No it is not appropriate for her to make a comment like this but it doesn't suprise me as she will try every pandering way to win votes just like her lack of openmindness in regards to Cuba. We should "never" have gone into Iraq, but she supported that just like she supported NAFTA.
Hilary's comments baffle me, because they are exactly what I would expect to hear from a conservative Republican who thinks military force is the answer to everything. Now I've been Republican until recently, but I've been leaning towards voting Democrat in this election because I believe we need a smarter foreign policy. This is not the kind of smarter policy I was looking for.
Charlotte, North Carolina
Hillary’s comment regarding an American respone in the event of an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel is most certainly appropriate. What’s Senator Obama’s response going to be if such a catastrophy were to occur: To sit down for milk and cookies with the Iranians?
absolutely not She would be able to start WW3. people should be afraid of her,that woman is crazy.
I can not understand why the Superdelegates don't see it.What is the matter with them,are the all indebted to the clintons?That does not say much for the Democratic party.
I am from Canada,I can not vote,but if I could it would be for Senator Obama.Thank you
No, it is not an appropriate comment, but a lot of what Hillary says is not appropriate. She works too hard to appear tough and ends up imitating Bush. She is not what this nation needs for this time.
We don't need another war monger in the white house. For Clinton to obliterate Iran would surely bring Iran's allies to obliterate us. If that is what she means by saying she is "strong", we don't want a bully talking for us. That;s how wars are started. Obama is more diplomatic, and I can see that he is more capable of having the world view us in a better light.
DJ
California
Obama is absolutely correct. Clinton sounds like a warmonger. It is like Barack Obama said, we cannot make these kind of statements while continously giving Iran a number of strategic advantages. Talk about irony. It is hypocritical to tell your opponent not to speculate on Iran, and a few months later (when politically convenient) say that we will be able to not just obliterate them, but "totally obliterate" them. All I can say is that she does not speak for me, and she never will.
I think this is a good message to send. It will take Iran's nuclear option off the table as too dangerous. It leaves little doubt that we can do what we have never had to do. As always if we choose to fight on our terms we will always win and our interests will be respected.
In many ways, more like Bush than McCain.
Stubborn, non-listener, intent on doing things her way, and her most recent proclamation, “you’re either with us or against us” on the gas tax scam; How can bombing Iran possibly be construed as co-incident with peace and drawing down the troops if she were to elevate the situation?. So she bombs Iran...then what? There are 16 million people in Iraq, 64 million in Iran and 160 million in Pakistan, a tenuous ally, with Iran having the same Shia sect government as Iraq. Yeah, definitely some war elevation there. Iran has no nukes....but Pakistan does, and just look at how stable their government is...........Think people, think.
I think Hillary goes too far in trying to distinguish her positions from those of Senator Obama. They're nearly identical on policy, so she grabs on to anything to be able to say she's different, and in the process, ends up siding with McCain and the Republicans.
This is just another case of Hillary doing anything it takes to win, even if she isn't true to herself or her party.
Boise, Idaho
Jack,
It is the wrong thing to say. It only fuels Arab fires. She is pandering for votes again just like with the gas tax holiday nonesense. Why don't we attack the Palestinians or the Lebenese? They attack Isreal don't they? Are we really going to provoke an attack on us and/or Isreal by using this language for primary votes? Hillary is clearly willing to risk that possibility for votes...which showshow low she will go.
Paul
Boston, MA
Hillary's comments are very appropriate. If Sadam Hussein had been told before he attacked Kuwait what the reaction of the US would be, maybe he would have reconsidered his actions. Besides, if we don't react if Israel is attacked, we're next! AND SOON!
`
i do not see any thing wrong with hillarys comments on Iran , but i would al so tell Israel there are borders around your country stay in them, because we will not support you beond them. also i would tell them not to act with blind faith we will not cover all there mistaks .
Perry J. in Council Bluffs Iowa
Jack,
The short answer is yes! Iran has threatened to obliterate Israel, our ally in the country's region. I think stopping Nuclear proliferation is what Hillary says to be the first step. If Iran took action against Israel we should obliterate them and we would have a great coalition behind us. We have lost our moral authority in the world and to take a step against Iran would be well advised. We are a great country and have zero tolerance for social injustice.
Not only is it not appropriate, it is downright stupid. How do you go to 'middle ground diplomacy" from there?
Hillbilly should get it through her thick skin that it is not necessary – as a lady – to act like a WWE wrestler to portray yourself as strong and resolute. Just more disingenious bluster!!
dieter
Toronto
I couldn't believe Hillary Clinton's comments the first time I heard them-let alone hearing her repeat them yesterday. Haven't we learned anything lately? When world leaders appear to be threatening our peace, then instead of just eliminating them, don't we want to discuss potential peaceful approaches and use our wise and well earned influence on the world stage. I hope a new President tries every reasonable alternative to creating more war?
waltham, ma.
Absolutely not! We need someone who will stand strong and tough if an ally is attacked. Remember the question was in reference to Iran having already launched an attack and not talking or thinking about an attack.
hey Jack
she was very wrong for that comment against Iran. Now she wants to wipe out a whole country. If it is wrong for Iran to say that about Israel then it is wrong for us to take the same position. she will say anything to get elected. people wonder why Iran wants the bomb, but why kill all Iranians because their leaders have stupid views like the leaders we have. anyone who votes for her because of that is really stupid.
Clinton’s comment on Iran was not only terribly irresponsible and foolish but it was very Bush like and very dangerous. Someone please stop this mad woman!
It's classic Clinton campaign tactics – say anything do anything to win, in this case to win the Jewish vote.
I find this amusing. In all her foreign policy experience you would think she'd know that no such mutual-defense agreement exist between the US and Israel. Perhaps the paperwork got lost in the same realm as those sniper bullets that were flying over her head.
Adam
Miami, Florida
Jack
The US has had a first use of nuclear weapons policy going back to the cold war. If you don't threaten to use them when your allies are invaded then they are useless as a deterent and you'd better have enough conventional forces there to defend against the invasion. So take your pick, talk tough and act like you mean it; talk weakly and have your enemy call your bluff, or have a massive arms build up in the region. Hillary's answer is the cheapest.
I think her comments need to be viewed in context. Most of the Middle East has a very negative and weak perception of females. Iran particularly is given to bombastic comments. She said what she had to say given those two facts.
No, her comments are not appropriate when one considers, she has stated she is going to end the war in Iraq soon after she takes office. We have seen this before. Just think back over the past 8 years. This is consistant with her voting for war without having all the facts. There's a pattern here that aims to play on our fears as was done just prior to the PA primary.
Barry Harris
Phoenix, AZ
Lets get things straight. Senator Clinton did NOT say she would obliterate Iran, but said that the US COULD do that. There is a big difference in the two statements. And once again a news media is just picking the one that would create more problems so they can report on it. But in doing so they really do more damage than good.
of course it is not appropiate! she is doing everything and saying anything she can to win votes.she is a proven liar just as bill is and we can not afford these people in office any more.look at all the political leaders from ted kennedy to marrion barry to nixon to you name him who have disgraced themselves and their office.when is it going to stop.
I don't want Hillary Clinton's eight fingers or two thumbs any where near our war buttons at any time. That has to be one of the most irresponsible remarks to come out of any public figures mouth in decades. I hope my fellow Americans are smart enough to realize that. I'm insulted that she thinks anyone would fall for it, but then there are those that think saving a few bucks on gas tax this summer is sound judgment, too. Go figure.
Jack – such inflamatory comments do us no good. It shows that in spite of her advocacy for Change, she will continue the same old, same old kind of foreign policy as George Bush – label and threaten our adversaries instead of working with them to seek common goals. I agree Iran is problematic, but we get no where with threats, name calling, and sabre rattling. Pius, Chandler, Az
I'm no fan of Hillary but I was shocked at the stupidity of her remarks. She seems to be adopting Bush's cowboy politics and that is scary. Bush's administration has hurt our international ties and status. I don't want another president who makes decisions before consulting with advisers at home or our allies around the world. This irresponsible language is so much more damaging than anything in the Reverend Wright debacle. Hillary's shoot from the hip rhetoric should make her supporters pause and consider where she might take us as president.
Jack, Hillary should stop pretending that she is different characters in
movies and selling wolf tickets. If she really wants to look up to a role
model, she should take the advice of the space man in "The Day The
Earth Stood Still" , and make peace, not war to save the planet.
Of course it's inappropriate and Obama is absolutely correct on this and most issues. Hillary will do ANYTHING to get elected. She is pandering to anyone who will listen. I am so tired of the media promoting her and raking Obama over the coals. Jack, you and Keith Olberman are the only credible journalists left on cable televison these days. I've quit watching everything else. I'm tired of being told by spin doctors, what I think!
Jack,
Let me break it down for you. Imagine Obama making that kind of comments? Imagine Obama behind in delegates, States won and popular votes, making that kind of comments? And imagine Obama talking about gas tax when every economist and members Congress know that this notion is another way to disrespect our working class?
Lt's get her out of the race tomorrow. Enough of this embarrassing spectacle of the Clintons! Absolutely innapropriate!|
Hillary is smart. She's just using that "Smoke 'em out of the foxhole" stuff that worked so well for George Bush Jr.
There are a lot of really dumb people in the U.S. who love that bravado, not realizing it could mean the end of the U.S. also.
No. She called Obama "naive" and "irresponsible" for saying he'd strike within Pakistan if bin Laden was there and their government wouldn't cooperate, saying he shouldn't announce what he'd do regarding foreign policy.. Now she's sounding just like Bush with her bellicose language. I guess losing makes one change one's tune. I wish she'd hear the voice of the fat lady singing!
i think it is about time someone takes a stand , since no one in the white house has. saturday morning cowboy movies are easier to deal with than reality. hats off to hillary for having more balls than her opponents.
Its not the kind of language world leaders should use. It is inflammatory and this kind of bullying will not help anyone on this world. It is exactly the kind of language that Bush has used, sweeping statements like axis of evil – slamming whole civilizations and cultures! People inhabit in these countries. Some of these, especially Iran, is an ancient civilization. The Persians are sophisticated people. It hurts them and it hurts us when we make enemies. Jack why is it that the US likes to make enemies? Every year there emerges a public enemy No 1! Its just so unhealthy, for our kids, our grandchildren. I think our leaders should show more sensitivity and refine their language. America already has a bad name.
No the comments remind me of Bush. But she is right on the gas tax. Any money I can save and donate to the Obama campaign has my vote!
Absolutely, positively. She said it in response to a question regarding a nuclear attack on Israel scenario. And said (in essence) the US is CAPABLE of obliterating Iran so watch it buddy!!
I agree with Hillary that Iran needs to be strongly reminded that they would be attacking a super-power's friend and ali and would pay a devastating price for even thinking about using nuclear weapons.
No nuclear attacks anywhere in the mid-east or Arab countries should be tolerated and Iran should know how our next president feels about that threat right now.
Her comment was completely appropriate...... if her name was Barry Goldwater, Curtis Lemay, or Rush Limbaugh. We have demonized Iran's president for using such language regarding Israel, so why would it be ok for her to go down the same road? War, neclear weapons, strategic air strikes, invasions are all very serious matters and should be talked about in nuanced language. The glorification of violence against "others" is part of what made it easy for GW to lie us into war. Perhaps she is trying to appeal to the pro destruction voting block.
She is only stating the obvious. This has probably been standard operating US policy for decades, similar to the Cold War idea of nuclear deterrence. Sometimes lighting candles and singing peace songs doesn't do the job.
But anything is a good excuse to bash Hillary, right?
We must assume that Hillary has again not read her intelligence estimates (as in the case of Iraq), because she would know that Israel is not only well-endowed with around 200 nuclear weapons, but also probably has the best intelligence network in the world, backed by an aggressive pre-emptive strike policy and hardened armed forces. They don’t need Hillary interfering in their region with thoughtless remarks that will only drive up the price of oil for the middle-class that she purports to defend.
No, her comment is not appropriate. We don't know what may change the political dynamics of the Middle East in the future. To use language that doesn't allow for other possibilities to be negotiated is to continue the Bush legacy of "I want to look tough so I'm going to start a war." Besides with our economy the way it is and the military as stretched as it is, who says we will be in any position to exert power any where in the world.
No they weren't and this is the pundit that has all the experience. I hope she is experienced at getting bad press Jack. Wolfe and the CNN Billary Cheer leaders are drowning you out speak up Jack, your the voice of reason on that show.
Hillary says what ever she needs to say to get votes. Her in the White House will be no different then what we have now. She scares me even the way her campaign is conducted. What scares me worse is Bill as first lady.
We need change in that White House, but please spare us from Hillary.
she must be crazy to commit to a nuclear attack on Iran. I would definitively keep her at least a few mile away from the red button. i see why she wears red suits all the time.
I find that they can only help Sen Obama if he wins both. Sen Clinton isn't going anywhere, even if she loses both. She will wait for the "Superdelegates" to throw her out first! She's relentless and ridiculous!! She feels that the White House is her "GOD" Given right!
The two primaries are important but no matter the outcome the Clinton campaign will paint it as a victory and continue. The Clinton's seem to consider the Presidency a birthright!
It looks like seating the Michigan and Florida delegates are the last hope for the Clinton's if they are still behind in popular, pledged delegates , states won and superdelegates. What a joke! The Clinton's have ruined whatever goodwill was left over from President Clinton's legacy.
YES
By electing Clinton as president we will have 3.bush presidency, no need for mccain.What a shame for her.
You betcha Jack. But do we really have to wait?
Since Obama apparently rules out the use of force, I guess he plans on sending Rev Wright to Iran to give them a stern talking to.
It seems NOTHING Hillary ever says is appropriate according to the "worse political team on television". You folks elected Obama months ago and continuely give him favorable coverage while finding every way possible to put a negative light on whatever Hillary says or does. I'm appalled at your slanted coverage of this election. You seem obsessed with Obama. I hope you are happy when a "rookie" gets in office and trys to deal with all the trouble the USA is going through today.
I understand what she is doing .
Obama said he'd say "we will use the utmost force on them" –
what the hell difference is that.
Quit picking like rats after cheese.
Jack
Jack,
I was shocked when I first heard the "obliterate" Iran remark. It is certainly not appropriate, and she should heed her own advice on caution with remarks toward Iran. When did the Democratic party become the party of war? I know Clinton voted for the Iraq war, which was inexcusable, and why I can't ethically vote for her. Didn't she learn any lessons? I thought we had all learned a very painful, and expensive message about jumping into war.
Tammy-
Dunedin, Florida
Are you kidding? She wants to look tough on defense. It is one thing to listen to the right wing hawks talking like that but to hear her say those kinds of things confirms my feeling that she never really left the Republican party (college-Young Republicans). Her and Leiberman ought to run together!
Turn coats!
From NYC,
I think the comments are serious however very silly. Sounds more like she should be coaching the Knicks, then trying to win the presidency.
One of her supporters said she has the testicular fortitude to protect our country,that totally confuses me.I don't think she is ready.There are those amongst us that beiieve that musroom clouds should have gone up ver Afganistan by 9/12/01.Instead she voted to go to Iraq.
Hillary Clinton's remark about "obliterating" Iran is completely out of line ... If this is the mentality she would bring to the White House, not only do We the People, need her in the White House, we should NOT have such "War Mongering" Senators seated in the Senate ...
Iran knows the US position on Israel. There was no need for Clinton to use the "obliterate" rhetoric. It's bad for our image in the world which is currently lousy thanks to Bush. Maybe this is why Richardson switched to Obama.
Hillary Clinton is a undercover Republican. "War" should be her middle name!
jack, Hilliray is basically saying that with her answering the phone at 3 AM we'd be getting four more years of shock-and-awe foreign policy.
Clinton's comments demonstrate her 'attack mode' which is unpleasant, mean, and reactive rather than intelligent or thoughtful. She treats other countries not on the same wave length as the United States like she treats individuals who don't agree with her. Of course the US would respond to any attack on Israel by Iran, but to say we would 'obliterate' them shows anger (yes, emotions) and a total lack of problem-solving skills.
Jack, her comment is neither appropriate nor intended to Iran. This latter knows exactly what happens if it ever considers confrontation with Israel. This comment is designed for the Jewish community, and to reassure herself that she's got the backing of its lobby. The greatest butt kisser of all times; Hillary... Just as Scrooge is for stinginess, Hillary is for butt kissing. Amen to that
Jack,
I support Obama also, but I do agree with what Hillary said. Now using the word 'obliterate' may have been to strong of a word to use in a public forum. But Iran needs to know that there will be retaliation for using nuclear weapons on not only Isreal but on neighboring nations. I do believe like Obama says that we need to use diplomacy when dealing with Iran to try to prevent them from gaining nuclear status... This is about the only thing I agree with Hillary on... =\
We have to show strength to those nutty leaders in Iran–their president is as much of a megalomaniac as Saddam was in Iraq.I don't believe for a second that Hillary or any other current political American leader wants to "obliterate" anyone....but we can't backdown when he purposely releases footage from his country of him walking thru a nuclear plant, smiling as he inspects machinery. The guy is sick and I predict he will, in many years, end up just like Saddam.
Jenn, Cape Cod
It doesn't matter to Iran what a candidate says, what matters is what the Commander-in Chief says ...and does.
That is something that Bush should be addressing instead of Hillary. She is taking on something that is not on the agenda now.
Her comments are in line with George Bush and other Neo Con foreign policy. Yes, they were out of bounds. Her comments aren't much different than the Neo Con foreign policy we have now. It's saber rattleing and she is capable of saying anything to get votes. If Hillary Clinton wins the White House expect America to sink deeper into the ox-dung.
Go Hillary! Why wait, nuk'em how!
Only a fool, or a madman would make such careless statements. Obliterating Iran would be the start of World War 3, a war which nobody will win.
Her comment helped me choose a candidate.
Def, I am voting for Obama.
We can not offord to have such mentality as a nation. She is losing touch. She is sounding more like a republican than a democrat. I do not like the notion of 'saying anything and doing anything' to win an election.
Will somebody please put a muzzle on Clinton's mouth? While she's trying to portray being a force as commander of chief, our enemies are already gearing up to shake the core of America. Be careful what you wish for?
Well seeing that we tell kids to talk things out before they get violent and adults don't do it is just setting a bad example Barack thank you for talking to our enemy's it show's that the U.S is actually civilized and not some drunk throwing back shots on the campaign trail
Sen. Clinton seems desperate to prove that she's tough enough to be
Commander-in-Chief. However, when she uses inflammatory rhetoric that may harm our future diplomatic efforts or fabricates "stories" about being under fire in Bosnia that undermines her credibility as a leader, Sen. Clinton ventures beyond the pale... and beyond my interest in voting for her candidacy.
I have never liked Hillary Clinton but when I heard her say we would obliterate Iran I sat up and took notice! It's not being a bully, it's being strong and giving fair warning. Wishy washy tactics against terrorist countries will get us nowhere.
She is right on the button!
Senator Clinton speaks the truth that should be spoken when dealing with Iran. Iran understands only plain talk.
What are the alternatives? Oh yes, we could threaten Iran with economic sanctions should they attack Israel; or we could condemn their actions at the United Nations.
Jack you are great.
if Clinton doesn't immediately cease her path of destruction, millions of young voters and black voters may not send checks, may not knock on doors, and may not even vote for her if she becomes the nominee. That's not a threat, that's the reality she is creating. I don't see the rationale on Hillary aiming for 2012. Democrats don't give candidates a second chance, especially flawed and detestable candidates like Hillary. If she really wants to destroy the odds that a Democrat takes the White House in 2008, does she realize that her lasting monument will be the spectacle of her bratty "sour grapes" tantrum she threw that brought on another four years of Bush.
Elaine Johnson
Atlanta, Georgia
That any US politician could threaten to exterminate 63 million innocent people shows poor judgement and callous disregard for human life. Israel has their own nukes; if they get attacked I'm sure they can destroy any and all of their neighbors just fine. We don't need to continue to act like the big brother to Israel, throwing money at them, running interference, offering to kick anyone's butt, no matter what. That kind of blind loyalty does little to promote peace and a lot to promote injustice.
I can't say i'm not surprised that Hillary said what she did about Iran. I am a younger voter and can sense some desparation in her tone. It is amazing how many things Hillary seems to promise anymore in her daily speeches. I don't think either of them should be talking about Iran because we can't even handle Iraq correctly. Let's see what either of them does with Iraq, before they switch focus to Iran. I am an Obama supporter and think its time for a real change from the Bush and Clinton rhetoric.
I am a strong Obama supporter, but Hillary used her words to negativly against Iran. You are supposed to keep foreign affair plans on the down low until you are actually elected President. To shout to the whole world we will obliterate Iran certainly does not fix our image of the United States, it is changing bad enough as it is.
All these poles really facasinate me now that I know my 11 year old grandaughter and her friends have been diglenently voting every night. Now how much do they mean to help you perdicate the outcome?
The U.S. would not obliterate Iran. It would be a very bloody war for both sides. More so for Iran, however, any death for an American is unnecessary. Iran is the third most powerful nation in the Middle East next to Turkey and Israel. They have greatly developed since the 70's, and would do catastrophic damage to any kind of a combat action. Senator Clinton is no better than President Ahmedinijad, they are both crazy and should never have been politics.
I'm an O'bama supporter, but I agree with Hilary on this except one thing "shut up already" first off quit telling our enemies what we're gonna do and making threats, when they do it, then attack without warning. Just like Bush did this idiot got on national tv and announce our attack on Iraq before we ever even got to Iraq how stupid does that sound.
She has every right to say what she said. This is a country that has declared they want to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. They need to know they cannot do it and they better not try. She is tough, she is strong and that is what we need when dealing with terrorists and countries that support terrorists. Obama said he would use the utmost force, so what is the difference? Just a choice of words. Or is he going back on that now. What would he rather do, let the islamic extremists get away with it? Or maybe take counsel from Rev. Wright. No, no, tough times call for tough measures and Clinton is the one.
Hillary '08
Watching the US elections from the North of the border is fascinating, and sometimes frightening. As someone who lives in another country with lots of oil which could easily be "obliterated" by America's power I have to hope that Obama's idea that actually talking to people might make us all safer will appeal to more voters than the insane, ignorant. unhelpful saber-rattling we hear from McCain and now from Clinton.
Well the fact that Iran was able to go to the UN and complain and get listened to should tell us something. There is more to the world then the USA and with the way things are right now we need to get our house together before we start talking about how we could or if we would obliterate anyone. I also think that people forget that Hillary was very much a republican and that it is why she slips so easily in that camp. I am still waiting on the years of experience she was suppose to have in the 11,000 pages released on her. The reason Sen. Clinton gets away with saying what she does Obliterate and Holiday Tax is because we let her get away with it especially the media and that's what going to hurt us when all of this is over. I really hate to be so pestimistic but the democratic party is not going to heal in enough time after this. Please remember I said it first here.
This comment is so foolish it hurts. You don't win anything by threatening millions of people. This is Bush 2.0, we just won't insinuate, we'll just come out tell people we're going to kill them. Honestly, it's becoming more and more apparent to the world that they don't need the US, especially if the economy is bad. You can only poke people for so long until they just turn around and lay you out. All you Dems who hate Bush so much, take a good hard look if you're voting for Hillary. There isn't much difference.
Way to sway the neurotic demographic, Hil! It's as if she were saying, "Bring it on, world war III"
Get over yourselves. Nukes are a force to be met with by someone wno acts presidential. I'm not going to trust a guy to deal with these terrorists who, after 20 years, says he doesn't know what his minister has been preaching; that his good bud wanted to blow up government buildings; or thinks I'm too good to have the Feds pay the gas tax for a few weeks.
Stop with all the biased reporting.
Since when is talking tough to a country that suplies weapons that hurt our soldiers a bad thing.
Jack,
You and Obama need to take a long trip to Disneyland. Both of you live in Neverland. Yes, we can says Obama, but nobody knows what it is "he can" do being that no specific plans of any kind are brought to the table by his "dreamy unicorn" campaing.
Jack, somebody should call a psychiatrist for Hillary... and fast... because she has completely lost her mind. If these signs aren't enough to put her in the lunny binn I don't know what is:
1) She breaks down in tears after losing a primary
2) She makes up a story about sniper fire, and then tries to blame it on being tired (when did you last use that excuse!!)
3) She comes up with some delusional math to say that she is ahead in popular votes (math that counts Michigan when Obama wasn't even on the ballot) and doesn't count any of the caucus states
4) and now she is talking about Obliterating Iran.
It's sad... really is
Speak softly and carry a BIG STICK!
She should take a lesson from Teddy Roosevelt.
Fortunately, we have a choice between Hillary Clinton and Barak "Jimmy Carter" Obama. Keep fighting, Hillary!
Hillary has gone way too far. W e have to remember that Iran is not just a spot on a map. It is a country full of people, many who are innocent civilians. If we "obliterate" a country we kill babies, children, teenagers, mothers, fathers, grandparents. We don't need more politicians who are reactionary and have no others answers for a country we don't agree with than to bomb them off the face of the earth. We need a new approach. We need to show the world that we can listen and that we understand not only bombs and war but that we truly want peace and diplomacy. If this is Hillary's reaction to Iran, she shows a startling lack of judgement and vision.
History has shown that strength discourages war and weakness elicits it. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believes that he is preparing Iran for the coming of the Shiite messiah. This is not a man who will be discouraged from attacking Israel by gentle diplomacy. So yes, I believe Clinton reads him right and needs to let him know the US has resolve.
As an Iranian American, my views may be slightly skewed. I realize that. However, I am sick and tired of The U.S. bullying the rest of the world. It is obvious that our government could/would blow up the entire world ten times if it wanted. I think what some people don't realize is that thousands of years before America was "founded" (stolen from indigenous peoples) or Israel was "founded" (stolen from current occupants) The Persian Empire was a force to be reckoned with. There is a certain pride that goes with that history. America is a young bully to the rest of the world. If we don't stop acting like a spoiled, power-hungry child then eventually the other powers that be will overtake us. The leader of the free world should use diplomacy and a gentle hand with the rest of the world, to foster democracy in countries that have not achieved that great goal. Force and machismo will only provoke more hatred and violence. Haven't we learned anything from the past 100 years? It is sad to see how people in power abuse it.
She was dead wrong. I keep hearing she and McCain our tough and Obama is weak. I wonder why people think making threarts and being nasty make you strong. It takes a very strong person to sit down and talk withthei enemies.
NO, It is not appropriate. She is in no position to threaten anyone, let alone another COUNTRY. The only thing she should be threatening is a coffee machine.
Um ... yes, absolutely. It's a dangerous thing to base foreign policy and defense statements on pushing emotional buttons. We need a clear-headed, responsible–yet still firm–stance. How are we supposed to regain any respect in this world if our leaders (or would-be leaders) continue to use this stupid language of destruction and obliteration? What about the Iranian people–the students, the women, the children? Not every Iranian wants to nuke Israel. This type of talk will only continue devolving into an incoherent, emotional, and irrational back-and-forth. Obama is above this. He can move us in the direction of thoughtfulness and long-term strategizing, away from the fury exploited by unprincipled opportunists like Clinton.
Berkeley, CA
Jack,
Can we truly take this woman serious after dodging Bosnia bullets and laughing about this simple slip of the lip "3" times? I will be oh so glad when this nomination process is over. She makes me sick!
OBAMA 08
We can talk to Iran before they attack, although based on their recent history that would be an effort in futility. Once an ally is attacked the time for talk is over. Failure to respond appropriately (which, if the attached is nuclear, may necessarily include nuclear response) would tell the world and our allies that we will sit by and do nothing except talk. In that case, the next bomb goes off in our backyard. We cannot have a gun-shy President. I do not advocate war but there is a time and a place for everything. Iraq just happened not to be the time or place.
The naivete of the Obamaphiles and the man himself are frightening. Hope is a wonderful thing but hope doesn't get the job done. Sen. Obama has effectively convinced people that he is the candidate for change but change to inaction is not the kind of change this country needs.
The bottom line is that Sen. Obama cannot win a general election. If he cannot be competitive in Ohio and Pennsylvania with Sen. Clinton, McCain and the Repubs will eat his lunch and we will get another 4-8 years of Repub chicanery and ineptitude.
Of course her comments went to far! There's absolutely no reason, aside from political posturing, to use that type of language in serious foreign policy discussions, especially when the Iranians and the rest of the world already know that it's true. Clinton's comments do nothing but pander to the jingoistic tendencies of the blue collar electorate that all of the candidates seems to be vying for. If irresponsible, reckless sabre rattling is what we'll get from a more "experienced" candidate like Hillary, then count me out. I'll take Obama's measured, quiet strength any day. Haven't we had enough already?
Hmm...
She sounds like Bush+Cheney combined. Very dangerous concoction. I think it is time our fellow Americans start using their brains for thinking and completely reject such sewer politicians and send them to where they belong. We need some honest and collective leadership to get back all that respect we lost in the past 7 years. If she gets into the white house again, 'God save America'.
As usual, somebody is mis-quoting or at least taking out of context. This is not fair to candidates or to voters. Without lauding or defending Clinton, let's try to keep things complete enough to make sense.
The first time I heard this reported, the quote was to this effect: If Iran were to attack Israel with nukes, the US would use nukes against Iran.
Good or bad, that is notably different from this: "I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran."
Note I did not include your entire quote, just as you did not give Clinton a complete context. Was she answering a question (what was it then?) or just blabbing her innermost thoughts? Readers, when you see a thing that makes no sense to you, track down enough context to confirm what a candiadate really means, then decide. I know no-one has time to waste, but you have to look more closely at these quotes that trouble you. The media is too constrained by time to present the whole truth of a thing, even without bias.
Best of luck to all of us.
I hope people in Indiana will read this article. HILLARY SUPPORTED THE IRAQ WAR. Now she wants to attack IRAN. She is war monger...she is crazy. I am voting for Obama
Jack Now that we've won the cold war based upon the economic downfall of the Soviet Union maybe we should reconsider our "war on terror" and the "war on drugs." It's very hard to win a war when the supply of drugs is enhanced by an over-whelming demand and the terrorists blend in with the crowd and their will to kill an infidel is only increased with futher violence. Both Clinton and Obama are right to a degree. Let's get out of Iraq, and then maybe we'll know whether they are enemies or not. At least we'll know who to "obliterate" if Obama's negotiations don't work. Dialogue with anybody is the best alternative, but if you know where your advisary is and carry a big stick negotiations normally go better.
No, she scares me. I work with a lot of expats to the U.S. I know they look poorly on us because of our arrogance of this nature.
One role of the U.S. President is that of Head of State. In the U.K., it's the Queen. In short, that role represents the character of the people. This is the issue the U.S. is struggling with so poorly. Listen, we can't afford to have bad relationships AND bad policies!
Imaging it's 3am and the phone rings in the White House. There's a crisis somewhere in the world (i.e. terrorists.) Clinton's reply, "Annihilate them!" ...evil laugh.
Hillary Clinton's comments about Iran are reckless and irresponsible. She sounds an awful lot like President Bush, or even worse. Trying to sound "tough on defense" to attract votes is one thing, but this isn't even "tough on defense." It is sheer lunacy.
I agree 100% with Hillary. Of course Obama doesnt. He'd probably send Rev. Wright over to negotiate Israel's surrender.
If Iran were to attack Israel, what would be the proper course? Stand by and wait for those extremists to attack other surrounding countries and beyond? Obliterate them, that is the answer. Stand strong for what America is for. Why is Hillary being questioned for this answer? If anything, Obama should be questioned for his response. Maybe Iran and Rev. Wright have something in common. Attack us and Obama will be for us!
David, it is people like you who foolishly fall for her fireworks bonanza... she is glitz and glam, nothing else. She will keep jumping from one hot topic to another to garder support, all the way to the democratic nomination. And then for whom will you vote for? Thanks buddy.
Hillary Clinton has had eight years experience in the Senate working with the Bush regime. She has learned from the Bush party to say dumb things. Bush with his "Axis of Evil" statement and now Hillary with her "Obliterate" statement are two tough guys when it comes to sacrificing the lives of young men and women who have to do the actual fighting. Hillary will do and say anything to be the president.
I once thought that Hillary was an intelligent person, but no longer do I believe this to be the case. Her judgement is cloudied by he obsession to become president of the United States. Hillary does not think things through. She simply blurts things out. These things make her dangerous to the United States. Hillary is lucky that Senator Obama practices what he preaches and uses diplomacy, because there have been numerous occasions when he could have thrown her to the curb.
The important thing is to see that Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons. We need a president with a cool head and excellent military judgement.
Charles,
South Texas
When you peel back Hillary's "Democratic" veneer, you'll find a Republican! With the way Hillary has conducted herself during this campaign (w/her dirty Republican tactics), I believe she has gone back to her Republican roots or never left! Obama has shown that he more than passed "the test" w/the Rev. Wright fiasco – more so than the other would have done! Obama sounds Presidential, acts Presidential, and looks Presidential – much more than we have rec'd. for the last eight years! He also is much more believable than the other two will ever be!
Hillary Clinton's comments are definitely inappropriate and directed to those voters who are motivated by fear, hatred, political ignorance, media incitefullness, the phobias that destroy reason. Another desperation to use any distortion to be elected, however the United States does not need another Hiroshima and Nagaski mind set before the world in a vie for the most important office in the world.
I presume Hillary intends to kill all the children of Iran; to obliterate all the kids, all the loving mothers, the pregnant women, the gentle grandparents,the farmers, the teachers, the nurses; and thosemillions of perfectly decent people in that country who just happen to be living during a period of political instability – which happens to everyone at some point.
Hillary Clinton's remarks are despicable: the old American way: when a few bad apples get in power and make life unp[laesant for everyone, you kill everyone: all the innocents along with the handful of bad guys.
A fine example of what pisses people off about some US politicians.
Hilary Clinton's willingness to say ANY thing becomes more & more amazing, apparently as her campaign becomes more & more desperate. I can't wait until she promises to have Bill register as a sex offender if they get back in the White House!
Kihei, Hawaii
yes it is appropriate.
Ms. Clinton's comment was completely inappropriate for a primary campaign. She should save that sort of thing for the Presidential campaign. Other than that, it's the first thing on which I've wholeheartedly agreed with her.
It's flawless: Shout, scream, demonstrate, burn flags, embargo oil, fine; but use a nuke or WMD on us or one of our allies, and your country ceases to exist. Simple, effective, very few soldiers and sailors exposed to harm (as compared to a conventional war), insignificant impact on our national budget, and an excellent example for any other rogue nations that might consider similar actions.
Countries that support and/or host terrorists could be next on the list...
Yes, we are fading, and that is because we have failed to demand the same justice and fairness in this country that we go to other countries and wage war for. Americans have always been somewhat of a bully in the world and now the rest of the world through better communications can look in our back yard, and see that we are a bit hypocritical and respect then is lost!
Haven't we had enough of this tough talk and lousy decision making for the past 8 years? Scary to think we might have a president that would give no more thought to nuclear war than what is apparent fro Senator Clinton. Can we pander a little more to the Jewish voters please? She is absolutely rediculous!
Jack, Almost everyone wants to live like Americans. We think Americans should stay out of other countries problems tho. they don't get any thks or rewards for it. I love Americans and wish I lived there myself fading or not. The Iraqi war has cost you too much. I think you will have a tremendous President in Obama. The whole world is waiting to see this happen. Hes got intelligence, coolness, honesty and diplomacy and a desire to bring the USA up and he will.
Kimm
John Edwards, "you cannot nice them to death."
you simply cannot reason with religion. i don't care if you're the best lawyer or philosopher alive today. if blowing Israel and themselves will get them to heaven, how do you reason with that?