CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HLN



December 5, 2008
Posted: 05:00 PM ET

ALT TEXT

(PHOTO CREDIT: GETTY IMAGES)

FROM CNN's Jack Cafferty:

President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration is going to be a huge celebration bringing millions of people to Washington D.C. to party.

In order to literally keep the party going all night long, the city council passed emergency legislation this week allowing bars, night clubs and restaurants to stay open around the clock from January 17th until January 21st.

People could disagree about whether this is a real good idea. Yesterday, the leader of the Washington D.C. police union told the Washington Post he's worried that police resources could be insufficient during Inauguration weekend because of extended hours for clubs, bars and restaurants.

He said the officers in the seven precincts that serve the district will be spread thin and the amount of manpower needed for these extended bar hours is unknown. What is known, or can be reasonably assumed, is that if between three and five million people descend on Washington for the inauguration and the bars are open around the clock there could be problems.

Here’s my question to you: Is it a good idea to keep the bars in Washington D.C. open 24 hours a day for four days during inauguration week?

Interested to know which ones made it on air?


David from Janesville, Wisconsin writes:
It might keep the alcohol sector from needing a bail-out and 96 hours of binge drinking for large crowds always ends well.

Frank from Canada writes:
Speaking from experience, when I was a habitual drunk, I can tell you for certain that closing a bar will not stop anyone from getting drunk if they are so inclined. Once we are grown ups we all have the choice whether we are going to act grown up or not. People who think closing bars will keep people from drinking alcohol are likely the same ones who think teaching teens abstinence will stop them from having sex.

Ken writes:
Oh geez. Please let us party, it's been a LONG election!!

Lucy from Massachusetts writes:
Close the bars on time. Even in New Orleans, on Mardi Gras night when the clock strikes 12am the party is over, bars which usually stay open until 4am close, and everybody gets off of the streets.

Dan from Washington, DC writes:
I thank all the people who don't live in DC for their concern, but letting people go home at their own pace, rather than everyone at 2am, will ease congestion, limit drunken conflicts and help the crush on DC's arcane taxi infrastructure.

Jason from Canton, Pennsylvania writes:
With the last eight years and the current state of the country, I think it is a shame it isn't country wide.

Buster from Poughkeepsie, New York writes:
Road Trip! Damn Jack, my New Year's resolution was going to be to knock off the 96 hour drinking binges. Oh well, next year. Hey, if you or Wolf aren't too busy, I'll see you at the Capitol Lounge bar. I'm buying.

Filed under: Inauguration


Karen - Nashville TN   December 5th, 2008 1:13 pm ET

No, no, no. And that means NO.

Daniel Ambrose   December 5th, 2008 1:13 pm ET

Jack,
Why not? They might as well be apart of the rest businesses that are going to benefit financially from this historic event.

Daniel Ambrose,
Atlanta, GA

Kevin in Dallas, TX   December 5th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

It's a good idea if you want to end the recession! Democrats will drink out of celebration and Republicans will drink away their sorrow.

Jenny Rome Ga   December 5th, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Jack,
Sure. Between the disenfranchised Republicans and the unemployeed the bars should be doing a booming business. Shirley Temples for everyone on me!!!

Jane (Minnesota)   December 5th, 2008 1:22 pm ET

It's a bad idea, Jack. With that many extra people in town for the inauguration, to allow them 24/7 access to alcohol is a recipe for trouble for law enforcment - why give law enforcement one additional thing to do.

Richard - Knoxville TN   December 5th, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Absolutely NOT - And for the same reasons the bars are not open 24/7 the rest of the year or other times -

Barrak Obama - What kind of message is this sending to the rest of the country -

I guess it is DC and its government to come out clear and strong with the Republican-Big Business-Wall Street mantra of "Anything goes, even 4 days of street drunkeness, just as long as we make a buck - So what if we have to remove all regulations – We've done it before to fill our pockets - ".

James Conn   December 5th, 2008 1:23 pm ET

Jack, If the expected turnout is going to be as big as perdicted, its going to take that long to get served. Jim Logansport, In

Liberal in Los Angeles, CA   December 5th, 2008 1:26 pm ET

Although it will be a great celebration, I don't think it's a good idea.

Karl from SF, CA   December 5th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Why not. After eight years of nothing to celebrate, we, collectively, need a good party. With two wars, torture, illegal wiretaps and everything else coming to an end, Washington has a lot to celebrate. It's the end of the monarchy.

Dennis from Albuquerque   December 5th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

I guess it depends on the capacity of the drunk tank in DC and surrounding municipalities.

Eric from J.C. TN   December 5th, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Well jack,
It is a history making event along with a historical economical meltdown. I mean hey if it will get people's mind off of the disasterous economy then drink it up. I don't drink but have nothing against people that do as long as they are responsible.

Steve C   December 5th, 2008 1:29 pm ET

Bad Idea! Why do people need alcohlol to celebrate?

Steve,
Laguna Niguel.

hugh ~ tracy, california   December 5th, 2008 1:30 pm ET

As long as there's a designated driver or a taxi-ride back to the hotel why not? America deserves to celebrate Barak Obama's victory with cheers aplenty!
"Beer is proof God loves us, and wants us to be happy."
–Benjamin Franklin

David, Tampa, Fl   December 5th, 2008 1:32 pm ET

I question the wisdom of that unless the police are going to be willing to bust all the trouble making revelers regardless of political party or ideology. Last of the good parties for a long time. Enjoy, all that go but be safe.

John in Arizona   December 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

Jack, we're in a recession, if not a depression. Pumping beer for 1.5 million Washington revelers will pump millions of dollars into the economy. It's actually Obama's first economic stimulus.

Bob D, Morristown, NJ   December 5th, 2008 1:33 pm ET

It's party time, and this inauguration represents so much hope to overcome our deep despair. "Happy Days are here again", and those who can't influence or afford to buy their way into the fancy balls deserve a chance to celebrate as well.

Greg in Cabot AR   December 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

The Republicans will have to have some place to go to cry in their beer.

Geezer   December 5th, 2008 1:36 pm ET

No
I think they are asking for trouble.
Drinking too much affects peoples good judgement.

Doug - Dallas, TX   December 5th, 2008 1:38 pm ET

NO!!!

Billy G in Las Vegas   December 5th, 2008 1:43 pm ET

sure as long as Plaxico Burress isn't coming to the celebration.

"Party Like It 1933"

Marie   December 5th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Definitely. New Orleans only wishes it could as many people.

NANCY M.- Colorado   December 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

What kind of message would that be setting for the rest of the country and the world?

Linda in Florida   December 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I think this is a bad idea. Law enforcement personnel are going to have their hands full as it is, without bars being open 24 hrs a day.

Annie, Atlanta   December 5th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I don't drink, but I know some enjoy getting in the festive mood by having a few, and it certainly will help the local bar owners. So sure, why not.

mitchell ,arkansaw   December 5th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

yes,and they should be allowed to stay open 24/7 ,until the recession/depression is over. if we have to be forced to hear bad news everyday, we should be able to get drunk and ferget about it ,when we want to.

KarenB, Florida   December 5th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

we've already seen plenty of bad judgment. excessive alcohol consumption on top of it can only make it worse.

Lady   December 5th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

No. There will be too many people and too few law officers.

This is a great time in history... no doubt. But there will still be people their taking advantage of the situation and the uphoric feel of the atmosphere. Excited people will have their guard down and not as vigilant about their surroundings.

I believe the allowance of 'all night bars', will spawn more incidents of rape, robbery, and other disturbing acts of violence.

Molly B   December 5th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Molly – IA.

Mercy no! I agree with Geezer. The typical persons judgement is
somewhat poor at best but let them get even "half in the bag" and
LOOK OUT! I've been there and done that and know how stupid
it is. Stay sober and see how much money is saved. Besides,
we'll need the money in the coming years. I'm feel quite confident
that P.E. Obama will pull us out of the recession but it will take time.

Katiec Pekin, IL   December 5th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Shoot, why not Jack?
It is such an historical, great event, a person that is lucky enough
to be there should be able to celebrate it to the fullest.
Hopefully for his 2012 inaugeration we will be able to celebrate
our countries path to prosperity.

Gary - Woodhaven, Michigan   December 5th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Huh!?The way business has been conducted of the last 8 years I thought they already were.

Hummer Girl - Florence, South Carolina   December 5th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

Why not? The economy is suffering. Let whoever can make $$$ make it! This is the Democratic Way!! Free Enterprise!!

Cori from Colorado   December 5th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

If that happens, can you imagine how many problems this would cause? When people don't set limits on their drinking, they make really stupid judgement calls, like drinking and driving, fighting, or even the possibility of nonsense riots. Although there are millions who are happy about Obama's victory, there a still a lot of people who are not, and will look to cause trouble. The country doesn't need innocent lives being jeapordized on a historic night like that, and I'm sure Obama would agree.

John   December 5th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Jack

There's only one thing worse than drunken sailors and that's drunken politicians.

John in Normal, IL

Renee   December 5th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Wow I heard they'd close from 5am to opening time, but I hadn't heard 24 hrs... I think it's OK as long as the Metro trains/buses are also operational during that time. With so many people going to DC, I hope the Metro is seriously extending its hours!!

Lady   December 5th, 2008 2:00 pm ET

I just wanted to add, Gary – Woodhaven, Michigan, was hilarious!

Rich McKinney, Texas   December 5th, 2008 2:07 pm ET

Good for the Bars but not the police and fire department. Someone has to mind the store and if the store is full of drunks that becomes a disaster waiting to happen.
Terrorists attacks and drunks don't mix. No one will be able to tell the good guys from the bad guys and with a town full of drunks to police the police will be much to busy to pay attention to the warning signs of terrorists.

Aaron from Denver   December 5th, 2008 2:07 pm ET

Millions of people getting drunk and celebrating.... Sounds like the locals might want to barricade their doors and bolt down their cars.

wally Ruehmann las vegas nv   December 5th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

our bars here are open 24-7 great idea ,i enjoy having steak and eggs with a bloody mary at 5:00 am . great way to welcome the sunrise. it teaches one self responsibility and moderation.. think about the people coming off the nite shift, they should be able to choose there free time and place to enjoy...

Pat,Lexington, Ky.   December 5th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

As a recovering alcoholic, my thinking on this is no. Bars/restaurants are usually open 12-14 hrs. a day, right? That's plenty of time for anyone who wants to to get totally sauced. Besides, don't people want to remember the inauguration? and the historic sights in D.C.? If they drink enough, they won't remember any of it!!

Jim/NC   December 5th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

This country has been drunk for years. Why not?

Conor in Chicago   December 5th, 2008 2:09 pm ET

This is a good idea across the entire US.

Paul in Nevada   December 5th, 2008 2:10 pm ET

Haven't law enforcement and the Secret Service got enough to worry about that week already without additional drunks being thrown into the mix?

This Innauguration is not a spectacle of Beer, Bread and Circuses. It is a transition of power in our government and the beginning of an era of national repair.

Mike S.,New Orleans   December 5th, 2008 2:11 pm ET

I'm from New Orleans. I didn't know bars ever closed.

Jim   December 5th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Jack,

Well, it might benefit some Republicans who want to spend that 24 hours crying in their beer, but mostly it would just invite drunken chaos in the streets. Close 'em down.

Jim
Reno, Nevada

JD in NH   December 5th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Sure. It'll be a bonanza for the bar owners in bad, economic times. If they're smart they'll double or triple the cost of drinks for that 4 days.

mac from traverse city Michigan   December 5th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

As I understand it Jack the bars can remain open but alchohol won't be served after three-o clock in the morning. An estimated 3 million people are coming to town for the inaugeration and they will have to be fed somewhere. I see nothing wrong with these bar-owners keeping their food services open and making a good profit for a day or two.

C. Farrell, Houston, Tx   December 5th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Absolutely not, bars should be closed just like they are on election day. I don't want the wrong message sent to our children that could ruin such a historic event.

Larry in Houston   December 5th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Sure, why not ? It will help the economy...

Larry
Texas

Charlie in Belen, New Mexico   December 5th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Fine with me, I'm 2,000 miles away. Besides, the way that the economy is going, those four days may be the last time that many of those bars and restaurants will be in business.

Atlanta Charlie   December 5th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Sure why not – It might help boost the economy!

B. D. in Saugerties, NY   December 5th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

One million drunk people in Washington DC. What could possibly go wrong?

Lee in TN   December 5th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Definitely not a good idea. There will be enough work for the law with the big hoopla.

Terry from North Carolina   December 5th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Jack
Are you kidding ? This is a ceremony where the president elect is sworn in, this should be quick and painless, also alcohol free. Its not time for a party lets get down to business and get people back to work.

carol in Oregon   December 5th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

What are the odds to get home safe. I might want to put a bet on the bars to win.

Gina in Racine, Wi   December 5th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Yes.

This is going to be some Celebration....this is such a Historic event for us.

And after all....the Republican's need the bars to stay open all night so they have a place to cry into their beers, about how badly they lost November 4th.

Christine, Edmeston NY   December 5th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Good for business, I suppose, but it sounds more like a green light to potential trouble than anything else. I think I'd be most interested in hearing how the already over-stretched DC law-enforcement personnel would answer this question.

Tom in Desoto, TX   December 5th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

If we can make sure the politicians are in the bars, that would be great. At least we'd know they aren't setting up the next catastrophe.

Tina (Texas)   December 5th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

Why not? The economy sucks so why not rake in some extra money. You drink, get stupid, go to jail, collect 200.00 go home.

Tony in Michigan   December 5th, 2008 2:28 pm ET

What could possibly go wrong with that, Jack?

Frank, Connellsville, PA   December 5th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

There are two reasons to keep the bars open. First, all the Deomcrats will be drinking to forget the last eight years. Second, all teh Republicans will be drinking to forget the last....oh, guess there is only one reason after all!

Larry from Georgetown, Texas   December 5th, 2008 2:30 pm ET

The crime rate in DC is the highest in the nation without adding fuel to the fire. No it's not a good idea. Maybe they should add an additional 10% tax on the sale of booze so they could loan the auto industry $34 billion.

Joanne Buck   December 5th, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Who cares ! People will drink irregardless if bars open or not.
Joanne B
Minnesota

Roger from Espanola, New Mexico   December 5th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Sure! Why not! But let's keep the coffee shops and diners open too! If we're going to party, let's enjoy it. After the long campaign and with all thats going on plus the historic inauguration, folks deserve a good party. This doesn't mean that everyone has to act like idiots. The occasion is not to be compared to English or American football hooligans. Let's not knock it down prematrurely!

Stacy from Fairfax, VA   December 5th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

I personlly don't understand why someone would want to hang out at a bar all hours of the day, but it's about simple demand. You have those who are drinking to celebrate the new presidency and/or those who are drinking to mourn the demise of our economy. There is plenty of demand to justify the increased bar hours.

Paulette,Dallas,PA   December 5th, 2008 2:36 pm ET

People are going to get alcohol one way or another,so why not have the DC bars join in the profit making.

Ed   December 5th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Absolutely not..by the fourth day the floors would be to sticky, people would get stuck.

Jeffrey Cohen from LA, California   December 5th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

Its definitely a good idea. The atmosphere is going to be one of great excitement and enthusiasm and so why not have the bars open all night so people can continue to converse and experience good times they will remember for the rest of their lives! Plus its my birthday!

BodyByKen   December 5th, 2008 2:39 pm ET

I think the bars should stay open all night for the inauguration! It would be good for revenue for all businesses that night.

David Pickett Janesville WI   December 5th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

Bars open all night are never a good idea, but maybe with a big crowd and lots of controversial stimuli it will work out for the best.

Anthony Smith   December 5th, 2008 2:41 pm ET

Working in the restaurant business for almost 20 years, it is a HUGE mistake! You can't mix politics, alcohol, and proctologists in the same room.

Wildwood Crest, NJ

Deb I , Nauvoo, IL   December 5th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

Can you imagine how much a bar in DC is going to be charging for "inaugural" liquor? I don't think it is going to be easy or inexpensive to spend four days drinking. I have to admit, I don't quite understand the logic of this–are hotels that full that people are going to need a place to get inside? People, have a little dignity and respect–don't ruin this occasion for those of us watching from the boondocks.

Deb (Bow, NH)   December 5th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

You mean they're not already? Then what's Congress's excuse?

vern-t anaheim,ca   December 5th, 2008 2:48 pm ET

no definetly not,to allow bars to stay open all night is inviting all kinds of trouble by people getting drunker than normal and comitting all sorts of crimes.we have a 2am bar closing time here in california and thats when the bars should close in washington D.C.

Gary of El Centro, Ca   December 5th, 2008 2:48 pm ET

That's a great idea.......that way the bars aren't putting all the drunks out on the street at 2:00 am. They can drink themselves under the table and then stay there – no harm, no foul.

Colleen, Charlotte, NC   December 5th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

No!

Lynne, Boise, Idaho   December 5th, 2008 2:50 pm ET

This is America, Jack. It doesn't matter if it is a good idea, just as long as it's good for business.

Liz in Towson, MD   December 5th, 2008 2:50 pm ET

Sure, why not! It's a great business decision, and it's not like they'll have to worry about drunk driving, anyway: most people will be taking public transportation to and from DC that entire week, or at least they will if they're smart. Let them eat, drink, and be merry!

Tom Ft Lauderdale   December 5th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Jack

Where else is George gonna go

Pugas-AZ   December 5th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

No. I think it would be asking for trouble. Emotions will be running high and trouble will be waiting to happen. Let's don't blight such a celebration, We want 1/20/09 to start an era of good decision making and responsibility by everyone. It is essential for the country to move forward.

John, Fort Collins, CO   December 5th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

This is the inauguration of the President of the United States, not Mardi Gras. This time around, we all have much to celebrate, but being blind drunk at five in the morning isn't a great way to honor Barack Obama's special day.

Larry from Georgetown, Texas   December 5th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

When I first heard this, I thought it was a joke but now realize that this is the truth and frankly find it appalling. I'm not surprised as this is one of the ways our society is showing our own degredation into a people of instant gradification caring nothing for anyone except their pocketbooks. I'm gald I'll be at home and not on the highway.

Ana, Massachusetts   December 5th, 2008 3:07 pm ET

This how I see it: happy drunks = more beer = more beer production and cab drivers = more work = overtime labor = temporary job placements = temp increase of stock market. A ripple effect that can give us tax payers a 1 week break from this horrid economy. Hey Jack, interested in joining us for a Guinness Beer?

Ana, Massachusetts

PoliticoMike   December 5th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

Jack,
With all the hype on Obama and places capitalizing on him, I think we might just get the country out of recession by Inauguration night. LOL

Terry in Hanover County   December 5th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

That sure puts a strain on the D.C. police. Who's going to pay for their overtime? Not to mention who's going to clean up the mess in the streets after the party is over? Will the Metro and buses run 24 hours? The good news it will boost employment and business income temporarily in that area. The bad news is that a bunch of politicians will be running amok. Okay, so the bad news is nothing new. Go for it.

chris south bend Indiana   December 5th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Jack sure thing for a night that important it will be thank god they are gone and thank god the new is in I just hope i don't feel that way next time

me46   December 5th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Come to Las Vegas on New Year's Eve and try standing in one place without getting trampled and I'll let you know.
Tom
Sin City

william fitzwater   December 5th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

I don't think it is a good idea. If bars stay open too long it could encourage reckless behaviour. This in turn makes it more complicated for law enforcement .

Kay Ann, NYC   December 5th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Absolutely....can u say P-A-R-T-Y!

Judy, Exeter, Calif,   December 5th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

Sure it is. It'll be good for the economy, and besides the Republicans in congress will need a place to drown their sorrows. They should leave them open for the next four years, maybe things will improve in Washington.

Jerry from Jacksonville   December 5th, 2008 3:25 pm ET

Yes, I think all the bars in the U.S. should stay open for the four days, that way we can all get drunk and celebrate Shrub Bush and his band of thieves leaving office and hopefully Washington.

Jay in Atlanta   December 5th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Nobody outside of D.C. cares. But then, what else is new?

s buczak   December 5th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

yikes....this is an accident waiting to happen....

Lynn, CA   December 5th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

Absolutely NOT! It's just asking for trouble not to have ALL bars closed for at least 36 hours starting with 1AM Inauguration Day – people should be able to attend a celebration, some with their children, and not have to worry about a bunch of drunks. If people want to drink let them plan ahead to attend a private party or go home and drink themselves stupid, but not afflict their behavior on the majority of the country who see this as a momentus, first in history, occasion. Lynn, San Diego County

George   December 5th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

Just like any other city that is having a hugh event, they are going to stay open, and take in as much cash as they can. Washington is no different than Louisville before the Kentucky Derby, or Indianapolis, and the Indy 500, or Pasadena and the Rosebowl, or any city where the Super Bowl is being played. Let the booze flow !!!

Marie Ontario   December 5th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

Keeping bars closed in the waning hours of the day during the inauguration celebrations will be just about as effective as prohibition was in the roariing 20's.

People who want to drink during this period of time don't need an open bar to indulge so it is unlikely closing any of the bars will have any extra sobering results. So rock on America and enjoy yourselves.

Sid...Texas   December 5th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

Why not? Seriously Jack, would anybody notice the difference?

Shane in Boston   December 5th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

This is without a doubt the best thing that could happen to our country, because you know those closet alcoholics, otherwise known as "elected officials", can't hold their liquor, would go and do something stupid and would be forced into early retirement, thus prompting a widespread change in our capitol and FINALLY, we might just get something done. Absolutely a brilliant idea!

Shmoo, Janesville WI   December 5th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Jack, why only keep them open in D.C.? The rest of us need to drink around the clock, too, so we can forget about all the troubles of the past 8 years. Pour me a double!

Veronica in Virginia   December 5th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

A few million people in DC to welcome our new president is a wonderful thing, but not drunk. People can drink without getting drunk, if I went to DC on Jan. 20th, I'd have a few beer's myself, along with a few tears of joy. I bet Bush will be drunk on that day, Lol that's another reason to drink....Bush will be gone!

David Pickett Janesville WI   December 5th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

96 hours of binge drinking for large crowds always ends well.

Michael Voorhees, New Jersey   December 5th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

As a DC resident who plans to be in a great mood and in attendance at the Innaguration, I say, yes it is!

David Pickett Janesville WI   December 5th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

Why is Jack Daniels getting a bailout check?

David,San Bernardino,CA.   December 5th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

The United States has been on a drunken binge for the last eight years,why should we stop now?

Chryssa   December 5th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

It's not a good idea for any town's bars to be open 24 hours a day for any number of days, so I'm gonna say no.

Boise, ID

David Pickett Janesville WI   December 5th, 2008 3:42 pm ET

It might keep the alcohol sector from needing a bail-out.

Lucy from Massachusetts   December 5th, 2008 3:44 pm ET

Close the bars on time. Even in New Orleans , on Mardi Gras night when the clock strikes 12am the party is over, bars which usually stay open until 4:am close, and everybody gets off of the streets.

Kim, Dodge City, Kansas   December 5th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Washington D.C. has never felt the urge to shackel itself with the constraints of common sense, logic, prudence or good judgement, so why start now? Some will get drunk because they feel victorious, some will get drunk because they feel defeated, and some will get drunk and get behind the wheel and kill someone.

Tripp Mechanicsburg, PA   December 5th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Someone whose opinion matters must think it is a good idea. As for me, I don't like being around those who are inebriated at any time, much less 24 hours a day. Businesses that stay open 24/7 might benefit, but where people lose their inhibitions to alcohol, somebody is going to get hurt.

Jay in Texas   December 5th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

While I can understand the Democrats needing a few drinks to console themselves about being deluded into believing Obama was any different from John McCain, I suggest they just buy a bottle and take it to their hotel room and drink there where they don't jeopardize others' lives.
Brownwood, Texas

Deliciousone in Washington   December 5th, 2008 3:57 pm ET

Jack, Think of the restaurant workers, they will receive a little extra in tips and the restaurants will help with keeping 5 million people happy.
An extended 3 hours for happy hour. Yes we can!

Clincher 33139   December 5th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

Forget the bars being open till 05:00. Think of the need of public toilets that are going to be required for the 'party'. Just the approximate total of chartered buses is about 10,000; or about 80 miles if they're lined up bumper to bumper. Add to that private vehicles and about 3.5 million people and DC is going to be a pretty nasty place after the Inaguration.

Bryan from Colorado Springs, CO   December 5th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

This a good idea to have the bars open all night on this joyfull day. If we closed them I'm sure the bar ownwers would be the next to go in front of congress asking for a bail out.

David   December 5th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Jack,
Why. Isn't the crime rate high in DC already,

Pete from Atlantic Highlands, NJ   December 5th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Sure. It's a tremendous business opportunity in this down economy. Barflies always seem to have money to spend on booze. Besides, how much trouble can you cause in a bar? As long as there are enough cops to keep an eye on patrons after they leave the bar, it shouldn't be too bad. The city should be able to make some money from disorderly conduct fines, too.

L. Mccullough   December 5th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

Why not!!! The people who can't find rooms available need a place to stay and the money they spend will help the economy of
Washington DC.

Mike out West   December 5th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

If they are serving alcohol at private parties all night long, why not level the playing field?

Besides, the bar owners need the business far more than some private party planner charging attendees more than some people make in a year.

garrick   December 5th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

hi jack
well i hope they have alot of soap & water toothpaste and deoderant ,for all the people that cant find hotels and will make the bars their homes for 4 days,
clearwater,fl

Gigi in Alabama   December 5th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

That's a dumb idea. There is enough crazies in our nation's capital without adding crazy drunks to the list. It might be better to make sure the bars are closed 24 hours a day instead.

Diane Dagenais Turbide   December 5th, 2008 4:13 pm ET

It sure will contribute to the >flow> of money!

Brian Miami, FL   December 5th, 2008 4:13 pm ET

Absolute (ly)!

The more time celebrating the exit of "W", the happier we'll all be!

As a matter of fact, bars in all cities across the world should stay open the entire night of 1/20/09 so that the entire world can celebrate the exit of the criminal with us...

Howard M. Bolingbrook IL   December 5th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

The inauguration has little to do with the with bars staying open all night.
The bars being open overnight has a lot more to do with the commercial benefits to Washington D.C.

Steve   December 5th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Stupid idea.
People can get enough alcohol in 15 hours a day

Juanita   December 5th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

No, nothing should be scaled back. This is the people's president and any one that can attend should – and the more events to attend the better.

Robert In Alabama   December 5th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

I lived in New Orleans for years. All the bars in the French Quarter never closed and it was not a problem because it was in a small confined area where there could be an overwelming police presence. If Washington wants the bars in a small, confined area to stay opened, OK. If they want all the bars in the city to stay opened, have alotof body bags available.

Linda in Bisbee, AZ   December 5th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Absolutely NOT. There will be enough drunks mucking up the ceremony as it is. At least cut them off at 2 AM.

Les Oklahoma   December 5th, 2008 4:22 pm ET

I guess the Bar owner will be wanting a bail out if they close the Bars however whiskey is supposed to be the most depression resistant business there is.

sandy in ohio   December 5th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

It's not the bars being open 24 hours that worries me; it's the people consuming all that alcohol. People who get drunk often become violent and the last thing we need at the inauguration is violence. I'm sure that if there are any problems Obama will take the blame, but I don't think this was his idea or anyone close to him. But we all know how people love to fix blame when something goes wrong.

Allen in Avondale, PA   December 5th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

They should stay open all night and all the next day. Getting rid of the worst President and Vice President in history is reason enough.

I do not drink much but this may temp me to really tie one on.

I am a 66 year old INDEPENDENT and this administration is the worst in my recollection.

I hope this country has not been damaged beyond repair.

Tino   December 5th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

I don't care, I live in NYC. Besides how much more damage can they do in Washington than what the gov-heads have already done!? For all I care they can burn it to the ground.

Pat-Arizona   December 5th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Good for the bars, but does D.C. really need a million or so drunken bums wandering around?

Amy, Canton, OH   December 5th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Great idea!!!! Make mine a double!!!!

Amy   December 5th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Sure let them stay open ,
but let the last call for alcohol be at 2 AM. And not serving it again until
noon the next day.
People can celebrate without drinking themself silly ! !

Angel   December 5th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Yes...it will be a tourist night and good for business especially in this economy...

Joe in MO   December 5th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Bad idea. The crowds will be hard enough to control without the added liquor sales.

Lynn, Columbia, Mo..   December 5th, 2008 4:38 pm ET

It's still a free country. If they don't drink in bars, they'll just drink in hotel rooms, so what's the difference? They did repeal the ban on guns though and that could be worrisome. Hope nobody gets hurt. Joyful days ahead. Can't wait to watch them on TV. Drunks can be very entertaining.

ingrid, new york   December 5th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

to each his own manner of celebration and celebrate we must!
the 20th will be the true "new years" eve. for 2009.

Allen Warren, Hockessin, DE   December 5th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Jack,

Let the booze flow. A famous man once said, “I drink to forget”.

Will one night be enough to let us and the world forget the torturing of prisoners, attacking another nation without cause, allowing our veteran’s hospitals to become rat infested, our tax money spent on a war that should never have been fought, how the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, and the list goes on and on.

I think I’ll have a double!

Otto   December 5th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

Why Not! It is not only a time of celebration but with the economy the way it is these places need the revenue!!

John   December 5th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Jack: I think 18 hours aday is enough drinking. We want people to remember their time in Washington DC. Give the police a break.

John
Alabama

maggie from NJ   December 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

No. Why encourage idiots more than you have to. I do believe that Obama's inauguration is a momentus and historic occasion and we should all celebrate, but between New Year's Eve and the Super Bowl there will be enough boozing going on. Of course, the boost to the economy and liquor industry would be nice....

Mike - Hot Springs, Arkansas   December 5th, 2008 4:44 pm ET

Sure why not. Might as well have one last celebration before the country goes broke. This may be the last chance to celebrate. Things are looking very bleak.

Mike, Albuquerque, NM   December 5th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

That would create jobs, wouldn't it!
Just as long as they stop serving booze at the hour the law demands.

Tim   December 5th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

Sure. There are no hotel rooms available & this way they can all just live in the bars for a few days. So, sure, keep the bars open, but close the roads.
Tim in Texas

karen-phoenix   December 5th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

NO!!!!

Roger in Ca.   December 5th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

NO. If the expected turnout is going to be as big as perdicted they will run out of booze in one day anyway.

D - Atlanta, GA   December 5th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

I suppose it’s a good idea for those of them travelling to DC for the inauguration that does not have a place to stay. Why not just pull up to the bar and drink yourself into a stupor (NOT!!!). It’ll be job security for the bar owners, waiters/waitresses and most certainly for the DC police department as they have to deal with the drunk and unruly crowds.

Len of Colfax, WI   December 5th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

No! I believe that there could be a “better” celebration of this tremendous historic event if people didn’t attempt to see if every available drop of alcohol is consumed during the four days. The over consumption of alcohol by keeping the bars open will just dull the overall importance of Barack Obama’s inauguration.

odessa   December 5th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

yes as long the police and bar owners are watching people for heavy drinking so one can't get hurt..

Daniel, Indiana   December 5th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

It is quite apparent that there are problems with bars and drinking. I don't think it is a wise thing to do when the DC police department will be stressed enough with all the people attending the inaugration. Adding that many more out of control drunks to the mix will be a sure indication of unnecessary police abuse and use of force. People act foolish enough when they have been drinking without encouraging them to drink for two more hours.

Kieth Wagner   December 5th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Yes it will help the economy.......NOT

gerry   December 5th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

It's unfortunate that some feel the way to celebrate this historic occasion is to spend all night in a bar. One night, maybe, 4 nights-someone is going to regret this move.

Jeff   December 5th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Sure, the police will be spread thin with the influx of party-goers into D.C., but a drunk is easier to catch than someone who is sober. The real question should be; Where are they going to hold all the people they arrest? One city councilor said it best when he implied that the city could use the extra tax revenue generated by the extended hours.
Jeff,
Ashburnham, Massachusetts

Kal'el   December 5th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

Of course it's a GREAT GREAT GREAT idea. I'll be turning 21 exactly a week before inauguration and I plan to go to inauguration with all my friends, so this will be the perfect birthday present.

Matt   December 5th, 2008 5:23 pm ET

The bars should stay open. America right now needs a greater cash flow. With the huge crowds expected there the bars could turn a record profit.

Michael MacDonald   December 5th, 2008 5:25 pm ET

They should stay open till 2:00 AM for happy Democrats and from then till noon for miserable Republicans only.. The latter will need all they can drink to drown their sorrows.

Bill in Albuquerque   December 5th, 2008 5:28 pm ET

Well you can go to Las Vegas and party all night so why not Washington, D.C.? And since it's only for a few days, what's the big deal? People need to lighten up. Sure there will be a few idiots who abuse the longer hours but there would be plenty of idiots if the bars closed at 2:00 a.m. anyway.

Mike in Akron, Ohio   December 5th, 2008 5:31 pm ET

Why not? Haven’t we all been smashed with the last eight years of turmoil? Why not get intoxicated on a possible way out of this mess?

Tim   December 5th, 2008 5:33 pm ET

Now I love a drink as much as the next guy...but I fail to see why a crowd of shnockered people at 4am roaming around the city is a proper celebration and not a safety concern....the simple fact this is being allowed is because of the financial gain to the city.....take the party back to your hotel room if you really need a 24/7 buzz.....i don't need that outside my apartment all night....

Ed Woodbridge,Va.   December 5th, 2008 5:34 pm ET

Simply put, this idea is a recipe for disaster, and whoever came up with the idea to keeps bars open 24/7, during the inauguration should have his/her head examined, and soon! Metropolitan Police will be overwhelmed with arrests, and handling other emergencies, and they will be stretched very thin! Hopefully common sense prevails in the D.C. government, and this legislation is repealed ASAP!

Fav from Colorado   December 5th, 2008 5:35 pm ET

No God no!! Doing that will only cause mayhem!
This inauguration is a mighty special one – alcohol should not form a part of it! Perhaps for the evening celebrations after the inauguration but not before and certainly not on the day.

Diane Memphis   December 5th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

No. I do not think it is a wise idea.

Still Ecstatic Obama-ite   December 5th, 2008 5:36 pm ET

What makes those people who are against this think that people won't be drinking just because the bars aren't open? Honestly, encourage people to go get overly drunk in the bars, and then lock them in, where they can do less damage than they would on the streets.

I shall be raising a glass in celebration from home!

Marva, DC   December 5th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

I think it should just be for the inaugural night. D.C. is not New Orleans. This is not a party city. I think the mayor is just asking for trouble. He's young, and he'll learn. There will be more crimes throughout that period than he can imagine. With 4 million people in town, you want the bars closed at a reasonable time.

Plus, people have to get up and go to work the next day.

Jennifer, Minnesota   December 5th, 2008 5:43 pm ET

Jack, I'll take a double and eight years of leadership by a thoughtful, intelligent President Obama.

Larry from Georgetown, Texas   December 5th, 2008 5:46 pm ET

Throwing gasoline on a fire will always cause it to burn hotter. Allowing people to drink longer is real dangerous and there will be some major problems that people will look back and say the money that the bars, etc. made wasn't worth it either but oh well that's life in America.

Heidi, CA   December 5th, 2008 5:47 pm ET

It's going to be cold, so the bars are going to be filled with people. Georgetown, Adams Morgan, Connecticut Avenue, Chinatown, Capitol Hill–fun, fun, fun.

Take it from a Washingtonian, fun, fun, fun.

CAROLYN JONES   December 5th, 2008 5:51 pm ET

if the bars have never been open all night before they shoud'nt be aloud to stay open for the inaugaration, people might get to sauced and create havoc on such a well look for event. hold the sauce i say, i cant stand to see drunks ruin a great well awaited day. carolyn ca.

Eli   December 5th, 2008 5:52 pm ET

It's a damn good idea. After eight years of minority (GOP) rule, this town deserves a good bender.

Come to think of it, considering how bad the economy is getting, the rest of the country could stand to follow suit as well. God knows they could use it!

Dan - Washington DC   December 5th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

I thank all the people who don't live in DC for their concern, but letting people go home at their own pace, rather than everyone at 2am, will ease congestion, limit drunken conflicts and help the crush on DC's arcane taxi infrastructure.

Lynn Brooks, Sioux Falls, SD   December 5th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

NO!!! Remember the RIOTS from 1966?!?!?!!?

David in Moscow, ID   December 5th, 2008 5:56 pm ET

Jack,

Why does everyone think this is President-elect Obama's call, I think that is your answer right there... if there is any problems... they will be attributed to the president-elect, not to the mayor. So they should keep the bars closed, why give opponents useless fodder to hamper his ability to get real progress.

David

Paul Round Rock, Texas   December 5th, 2008 6:04 pm ET

It will good for the bottom line of all the Bars. It will be good for the Republicans to drown in sorrow of their defeat in the elections all over the country. It will also be good for the Democrats that want to party about the big Wins they had. Jack it will also be good for the people that really don't care about anything.

Ann from Newton, New Jersey   December 5th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

Aren't there enough accidents from drunken drivers without giving them an invitaiton to belly up to the bar all night? Stupid idea!

Michael, New Jersey   December 5th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

Certainly, Jack, I'll definitely drink to that. When Obama is inaugurated, there will definitely be major celebrations, and what better way to celebrate than going to the bar and drowning five shots of malt liquor. As I said, I'll drink to that.
PS: and I will certainly go to the bar and celebrate if my comment is read on TV.

Liz in California   December 5th, 2008 6:07 pm ET

Bad idea. If people want to drink past the usual curfew, they should take responsibility for doing so someplace where they don't endanger others. Think of the drain on taxpayer dollars from overburdened police, fire departments, hospitals, etc. just to protect the egos of irresponsible people. Haven't we protected enough egos already????

Ray Victory   December 5th, 2008 6:10 pm ET

Vero Beach, FL
Probably better to have the bars open than riots in the streets because they're closed. A lot of people have a lot to celebrate!

Tyson   December 5th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

Sure its a good idea, that way all the law makers can drown all of their economic stresses. In fact i think we should do this nation wide, so all the american citizens can escape reality.

Matt Wolf   December 5th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

D.C. bars usually serve alcoholic beverages until 3am on weekends. Under the inauguration plan, bars will serve until 5am, and food may be served all night. Not a big difference and not a big deal - cities like New York and Chicago have similar or more permissive laws, and they do fine. Let the good times roll to celebrate this historic event!

lashawn tavernier, Orlando, Fl   December 5th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

As excited as I am about the inauguration I don't think it's a good idea to keep bars and restaurants open 24 hrs. Washington DC has a problems controlling crime on a regualar basis yet alone with the triple amount of people that will be in the city during this time. Too much partying could acutually be a bad thing.

Sonny   December 5th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Jack

We all know that liberals are a little on the wild side…. but millions of then with access to bars 24 hours a day may be a little over the top…

nickster   December 5th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

What a great idea! Since the Wash., D.C. area has one of the highest crime rates in the country, hand guns should be passed out also. That's the ticket! Let the people of Wash., D.C. party on!

Stephen Bennett   December 5th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Yes, it is brilliant. Provides shelter, restrooms, places to eat and recognizes the reality of all our visitors celebrating.

Tom Connolly   December 5th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

Heck Yeah! Let the people enjoy a return to democracy and an end to the monarchy! This is a defining moment in history! After seeing the unemployment numbers, mortgage meltdown and big 3 failure we might vote to have all bars open 24 hours a day for the next few years!
Tom Plainfield,IL

Tibs   December 5th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

What better place to be than teetering on a barstool in a Washington D.C. bar at 4 in the morning Inauguration Day? You can get a bit tipsy, enjoy the show, then spend the next four days figuring out how you're gonna drive your re-posessed car back to your now-foreclosed home. Talk about a bad hangover...

Aaron   December 5th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

This is hard to call. On one hand it makes sense that people will want to celebrate by having a few beers. On the other hand, 24/7 bars will increase the chances of people getting completely wasted. Let's hope most of them will be celebrating responsibly.

Nancy   December 5th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

3 million people.
Unlimited alcohol.
Bad idea?
Ya think?

Dean   December 5th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

Considering that all of the hotels are booked, and bars are not only bars, but resturants, and offer a place to rest and use a restroom, I
dont think being open will pose a problem, but offer a convience for the visitors. Drunkards would not travel all the way to DC to get sloshed!

Lena   December 5th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

Thousands of excited people + bars open 24/7 = asking for trouble!

Dee   December 5th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

No, No, No, why bend the rules for one event? Aside from being the biggest party of the centry it will also go down in the record books for the most drunk driving, indeceint exposure and disturbing the peace incidents in recent history.

Tony from NYC   December 5th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

Yes! It's a great idea!!! Don't assume that only alcohol will be consumed. People will get out, they will eat, some will have only soft drinks... Other States should celebrate as well... The goal being to have people spend a little of their money and have a good time, lift spirits... and get the sense of confidence back into the economy. This is a good start.

rusty in texas   December 5th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

sure its a good idea......people are gonna be in them from 6pm to 3 or 4 am anyway...i mean im a good drinker but i cant go 24hrs...the human body will se to it that the bars are 90% empty from 5am till 5 pm.....its called passing out.

Kate M., Washington DC   December 5th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

While it is not a great idea, it is also not a terrible idea. There is going to be sheer chaos no matter what, and the numbers alone are going to stretch this city's resources, police, transportation, and otherwise, very thin. Now while access to alcohol always brings problems, the people who actually stay out at the bars drinking heavily until 5 or 6 am would probably have brought problems anyway.

Rick -Omaha, NE   December 5th, 2008 6:16 pm ET

Jack,

As we all know, we are currently in a recession. A recession is obviously a decline in GDP for consecutive quarters. 70% of GDP is based on consumer spending. With that being said, i would consider keeping the Washington D.C. bars open 24 hours a day as a way of giving our economy a stimulas package!! Interesting topic to be debating with today being the 75th anniversary that ended prohitbition.

Godwin   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

Jack, its a brilliant idea. At least people will be happy enough to overcome the present economic mess. Something big is happening in the USA and it is worth celebrating. We might never see that day again. A happy people is a healthy nation at least in the short time.

Mark Lovett   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

The inauguration of he first black President of the United States is a solemn event in our nation's history.. The extended bar hours being planned in DC and the increased drunkeness and revelry is better suited for St Patrick's Day, not for this momentous occasion.

Gandahi Patel   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

Yes it is a very good idea for the city of DC. By keeping these establishments open the city will profit. DC is a city with a poverty problem could really use this cash.

Vanella Jackson-Crawford, Washington, DC   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

As a resident of Washington, DC and a supporter of MADD, I am concerned that people will be too much out of hand. I was witness to the celebration in the city after the announcement of Barack Obama as President Elect-it was enthusiastic bedlam. The police were patiently cautious, but I do not know if that patience would last for four days.

We also have a metro system that stops running at a certain time so if there is not some well thought out planning and coordination, this could be explosive and derail and otherwise wonderful experience.

Let the coffee shops stay open instead.

Mr. sekou   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

This is the worst DC idea since invading iraq. I am a DC bartender and I dred that week. This Little Town is already over whelmed with it's residents, imagine 4 million intoxicated visitors 24 hours a day 4 days straight. Cheers you idiots.

Dave   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

Actually, while the bars are open 24/7, they are not allowed to serve alcohol between 5 a.m. and whatever their normal opening time would be. The legislation was passed to make sure everyone isn't spilling onto the streets at closing time, all at once, and that people will have access to FOOD, to soak up all the alcohol they drank during the bar's serving hours.

OHIO-TIM   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

Mr. Cafferty

Apparantly the people who would be attending the inaugration for those four days have jobs and plenty of expendable money to waste on all night drinking binges. Maybe the bar owners could hire some of the 500,000 people who were just recently laid off this past month for the extra security personal that would be needed and help as servers and bartenders to serve the all night partiers. Is this the change that we were told about. Sounds like the same old same old to me.

Sarge   December 5th, 2008 6:17 pm ET

We should adopt those drinking hours nation-wide for Barack Obama's inaugeration! This should be a time of great celebration.
I am buying a bottle of Wild Turkey Rare Breed and will taste it with my
friends as our new President takes his oath. Don't you imagine that the Founding Fathers would approve? Why, we will likely toast them too!

Sarge
Indianapolis

Barbara Backus   December 5th, 2008 6:18 pm ET

Jack,
It's a terrible idea. A combination of the huge crowds who'll be in Washington for the inauguration, already in a party mood, with bars open 24 hours invites rowdyism, overindulgence and other sorts of problems.
Barbara Backus

Mark, Queen Village Philadelphia, PA   December 5th, 2008 6:18 pm ET

As a recovering alcoholic I don't encourage binge drinking and support sober living, but in this case, the Republicans might need a friend during the Inauguration. It was that way for Democrats in 2001 and 2005. Personally sober living was essential no matter the political climate and proud to say I am surviving the Bush Administration sober since December 1, 2001. After eleven months it wasn't worth destroying my personal life while GW destroyed the collective US-A! So January 20th it will be worth celebrating Bush, Cheney and Rice being the EXES of Evil, sober or not.

David   December 5th, 2008 6:18 pm ET

Jack,

Can you imagine the nightmare that would ensue if hundreds of thousands of drunk out-of-towners were all unleashed at once – last call? Take a lesson from the wonderful, enchanting city of New Orleans and let there be a slow trickle of revelers.

Marie   December 5th, 2008 6:19 pm ET

YES the bars should stay open. I was a student in Washington DC and Baltimore. Even when I was in Baltimore I came to DC to socialize and have fun.
Bars in DC are not just places to drink, they provide public arenas to network and fellowship. BUT if the bars stay open 24 hours then the metro should also run for 24 hours. My personal favorite bar hopping metro line? The red line Martinis at Maggianos, to $2 beer in Adams Morgan all courtesy of the red line.
This would also give DC a huge economy boost and promote the city. I would be there myself, but the economy is so bad I can't afford to go. And the poor economy is the only reason I left the district.

Marie from Connecticut.

Jonathan   December 5th, 2008 6:21 pm ET

The plan seems foolproof. What could possibly go wrong?

Terry Gourdine   December 5th, 2008 6:21 pm ET

Jack,

Absolutely! It will keep the drunks off D.C’s streets and roads!

Terry Gourdine
Clearwater, FL

Shaun Priest   December 5th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

Sure why not? It should be called the 4 day bailout for the beverge industy

Holden Caulfield -New York   December 5th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

How better to get over an 8 year old hangover than to drink late into the night, early into the afternoon, and repeat; as many times as needed to forget the last 8 years of failured economic policies

SD   December 5th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

What is wrong with a celebration of one of the most historic moments in our nation's history? It has been a while since Americans rallied and celebrated something as a country.

Shaun   December 5th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

I think that this is a terrible idea. Inauguration should be a time for sober celebration, not drunken mumbling about how all of our woes will change. Even though I'm a Republican and voted for John McCain, I think that out of respect for the gravity of the swearing-in of our new president, it's only proper to maintain a level of decency, a level of seriousness, and a level of joyous solemnity.

Scott   December 5th, 2008 6:22 pm ET

Bars open all night long for presidents taking oath? WOW Hope he can pay for it all this ( not just Finacilly either) ...

Scott Aiken , South Carolina

Godwin   December 5th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

Jack its a brilliant idea. Americans may never see that day again.

Chris   December 5th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

What gave them the right to make them close the rest of the time in the first place?

William V   December 5th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

In general, this will be a happy crowd – Peace, Love & Obama... New Orleans, Las Vegas, and others have managed to survive 24 hour access to alcohol – why not DC?!?! Party on Dems, and with a a bit of social lubricant, perhaps the 4 million plus can solve all the Worlds' problems! Cheers!

rusty in rockwall texas   December 5th, 2008 6:24 pm ET

yes its a good idea.....the bars will only be packed from 6pm till 4 am anyway.....the human body will see to it....its called passing out.

Dr Abdoulaye GAYE, Senegalese american educated   December 5th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Good Idea when you consider this as a baillout for this driving tourism sector. When more than 5 millions folks gather for 4 consecutive days; it is good for D.C. economy.

Mike Jacobsen   December 5th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

Is this just another example of greed taking precedent over common sense; in this case over "an event that is a genuine cause for sober and joyful celebrationl"?

Mark   December 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

It is incredible how anal the American public can be regarding things like this. What is the big deal? The police say they will be spread to thin...maybe its because we live in a land where everything is considered illegal in some form or another. Let people live, be free to celebrate...by keeping the bars open for that period of time is not going to be the end of the world. With the state our country is in I think its a great idea to allow people to really celebrate one of the few things we can celebrate nowadays

Chris   December 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Yes they should, all of the time, anywhere. It's time to end these blue laws. Any business can be open any time it wishes. You can't prevent people from making mistakes by simply giving them less hours to make them.

Amanda   December 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Of course it is a good idea! Besides the financial impact it will have for the local bar owners, just think of all of the resources the police will save by not having cite people for violating the normal rules. And really, isn't it a relief to have a reason to celebrate?
Malone, NY

megan lewis   December 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

heck yeah! as someone who will be there in d.c. and as one who enjoyed the mass jubilation on election night while in boston, open bars will be icing on the cake for the mass jubilation and hope this country has earned.
megan
NYC

JC   December 5th, 2008 6:28 pm ET

Institute a policy for free or reduce cab fares ("Sober Rides"), like DC does for other holidays that are associated with drinking, and it'll be fine.

Jacqueline   December 5th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

-Jack, they should keep the bars open...This is an historic event, we should be able to party for 4 days. I think people will be on their best behavior! After Bush, this should not even be an issue!

Bert Morgan   December 5th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Craziest thing I ever heard of.Will be nothing but trouble.
I live near Phila and look what they did to the city after the Phillies won?they tore up the city.

LibertyAnne in DC   December 5th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

Sure. I live on Capitol Hill and walk everywhere and there's a cool strip on PA Ave nearby. It will be fun to see everyone having a good time. It's time this town loosens up a little.

Heather   December 5th, 2008 6:29 pm ET

This is not the super bowl.. it's an inauguration for goodness sakes!!

Ted   December 5th, 2008 6:30 pm ET

I think it's a great idea. I wish other cities would do the same just for this one special night. I think it will help the economy too!

Josh   December 5th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

YES.

Spilling millions into the streets at 2 a.m., ALL AT ONCE, is recipe for disaster. Many will leave early, many will leave late. Many won't leave at all. Expecting them to all leave at once is madness.

Charles Johnston   December 5th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

No, What are they thinking? A celebration is one thing an invitation to drink all night in public will lead to, at the very least, indiscretions by even the most proper and intelligent Obama supporter. This has all the earmarks of a hugh PR disaster for the new administration. Call Pres.elect Obama-hey, call Michelle she won't let the party get out of hand.

Bob (Illinois)   December 5th, 2008 6:31 pm ET

That is a terminally stupid idea!

Carlos   December 5th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

It's a great idea, and it should be extended nation-wide, year round. Ask any cop and he'll tell you that alcohol-related problems start when the bars close and the patrons all pour out of the bars at the same time. No closing time, no problem.

David   December 5th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

This inauguration will make the million man march look like a cub scout meeting. Good way to clean out your warrant drawer though huh?

Khalid Ali   December 5th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Hey Jack I don't drink, but i support whatever could possibbly help the american people get their minds off these rough times. Or it could be that the bars and resturant industry is next on the list to ask for a bail out package this could help.

PLEASE DRINK RESPONSIBBLY
khalid Ali

Toronto, Canada

Nate   December 5th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

The comments from Texans stuck in a Prohibition mindset are hilarious!

I thought this country promoted freedom and personal responsibility? I should be free to purchase alcohol 24/7 if I choose.

Carolyn   December 5th, 2008 6:34 pm ET

Americans haven't really had a whole lot to celebrate lately. Each day the economic situation worsens and people become more demoralized. I say why not let the bars stay open and give people the opportunity to celebrate the Inaguration if they so choose.

Carolyn in Gainesville, FL

tori   December 5th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

What? You have got to be kidding me. Does DC really need money that bad that way??? I mean tickets and not the bars.......

Colleen Springfield MO   December 5th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

No, is it worth the chance of one drunk driver, one dead mom, dad, daughter or son? Have a great time, drink in moderation...have a Starbucks and then go home.....or call a cab...

Overby   December 5th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

Anybody that would be drinking in a bar at 4 a.m. would be drinking in their hotel room at 4 a.m. if the bars were closed, so it doesn't matter.

Nancy   December 5th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

I think it's in poor taste and a bad idea. So many drunk people in one town isn't what I would call a good time.

J Q public   December 5th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

Not A good Idea.

Mack   December 5th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

Evidently they came from homes where the saying, "Nothing good goes on after midnight". They think they are in New Orleans evidently.

Melanie in DC   December 5th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

As a resident of NW DC, i have to vote for keeping the party going. People are going to be staying 5 and 6 to a studio apartment that week, and everyone will need a release and a place to go celebrate.

Jim X.   December 5th, 2008 6:37 pm ET

YES. Beef up the police force by drawing police forces from other counties or surrounding areas. Most problem related to alcohol and bars are after the bars are closed when drunks and party goers look for more places to drink or things to do. Keep the booze flowing and party going, I don't think people be looking for trouble then.

Ryan - Porltand   December 5th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Bars are a perfect place to create camaraderie and bring together people from all walks of life. This will provide a great avenue to connect and celebrate this historic event. Do you celebrate New Years with a warm glass of milk all by yourself?

Ryan Spector   December 5th, 2008 6:38 pm ET

Jack,

With everyone losing their jobs and out of work where else is there to go! I'll be at the bars.

ChicagoSuz   December 5th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

Umm... that would be a big NO!

(guess what city I'm in... ;-)

Alex Syracuse, New York   December 5th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

I think it is a great idea for all of the bars to be open around the clock. This is an important time in our history and it should be celebrated by all. The old way of doing things is over and it is time to welcome a new future to the United States of America.

Arsene, Los Angeles   December 5th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

Absolutely. Why shouldn't the city benefit from such a huge historic event? If the country can elect a man that's actually qualified for the job for once, they should be able to have a good time in moderation, and remember their manners, or learn some manners before they get there.

Lorraine from San Diego, CA   December 5th, 2008 6:39 pm ET

You know what this means, Jack? Frat boys and booze hounds across the nation will think they've died and gone to heaven.

SCOTT   December 5th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

I believe that it's a terrible idea. With the world's eyes focused on America, the last thing that we need is the opportunity for another black eye. Why not save the all night partying until after the work is done???

Common Sense,
Petal, MS

eric in colorado   December 5th, 2008 6:40 pm ET

Jack: If we wind up with a 24/7 situation in D.C. the next step would be a slogan that says: "What happens in D.C. stays in D.C."

Joanna   December 5th, 2008 6:41 pm ET

bad idea bad idea. serving alchohol 24/7 is not a good thing and will stress the police department. stop serving alcohol at 2 am. that is enough partying. this is the stupidest idea ever!!!

don in naples, florida   December 5th, 2008 6:42 pm ET

silly question... Focus on the economy.. we don't care about alcohol.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Jack Cafferty sounds off hourly on the Situation Room on the stories crossing his radar. Now, you can check in with Jack online to see what he's thinking and weigh in with your own comments online and on TV.

Send your comments on the "Cafferty File".

Jack's Book

Jack Cafferty: It's Getting Ugly Out ThereJack Cafferty is the author of a new book, "Now or Never: Getting Down to the Business of Saving Our American Dream," now available.

Read excerpts about Jack's battle with alcoholism and Jack's philosophy on parenting.


CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room by downloading this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news including dispatches from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Powered by WordPress.com VIP