CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HLN



November 19, 2008
Posted: 01:15 PM ET
 Should the Obama children attend public or private school?
Should the Obama children attend public or private school?

FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:

The nation’s president-elect will be confronting arguably the toughest set of problems this country has been faced with in a very long time. The economy is in crisis, the treasury is broke, Americans are losing their jobs and we’re fighting two wars. It’s heady stuff but at the end of the day, one of the biggest decisions Barack and Michelle Obama are going to have to make is where to send those two delightful little girls to school.

It’s a decision many parents wrestle with all the time: Public or private? Public schools tend to more closely resemble the real world, while private schools provide a more insulated and, in most cases, intellectually-challenging environment. But Sasha and Malia aren’t just any two kids moving to Washington from Chicago and trying to find a new school. When they head off for their first day of class, the world will be watching and the Secret Service will go with them. Michelle Obama says she wants to be the nation’s “first mom.” Where to send these two kids to school will be one of the biggest decisions she has to make. And no matter what the Obamas decide, the nation will be watching and clucking like a bunch of hens no matter where they go to school.

Here’s my question to you: Should the Obama children attend public or private school?

Interested to know which ones made it on air?

Linda from Bisbee, Arizona writes:
What could possibly be gained by sending them to a public school? They will be easier to protect and will get a better education in a private school. I just know the Obamas can figure this out without our input.

Ann from South Carolina writes:
Public schools have nothing to offer the intelligence of these two girls. I taught in public schools for 24 of the 34 years I taught, and I watched the schools deteriorate as government demanded accountability for the funds they supplied. Today our public schools have one goal and one goal only: to place well on the achievement tests. Education has gone down the tubes.

Gina from Racine, Wisconsin writes:
After hearing the Obamas speak about their children and family values and then observing them with their children, I think they will make the best decision, in the interest of those sweet little girls, as to which type of school they attend. The media and the public should stay out of it.

Jon writes:
I’ve taught and done administration in public and private schools for years in the D.C. area. As good as some of the public schools in the District are, no public school here is set up to offer the combination of security for the girls and minimal disruption for other students as the private schools offer. The independent schools are smaller, have more secure campuses, and have a long history of educating children of presidents, senators, and congressmen and women. This isn’t really even a question.

Kenneth from Chadbourn, N.C. writes:
A private school, of course. What’s the sense of upsetting a public school just so the Obamas can be perceived as ordinary children? They aren’t, and won’t be for the rest of their lives. They’re the children of the President of the United States, and the only way they would help a public school is it will be the safest in the world.

Rod writes:
The Obama kids should attend whatever school they like. It’s a free country. It’s a dumb question.

Filed under: Barack Obama • Michelle Obama


Scott - Kansas   November 19th, 2008 1:44 pm ET

Out of respect for the Secret Service teams who’ll be assigned to protect them, their jobs should be made as easy as possible, and that’s in a private school. A public school is a nightmare from a security standpoint.

Daniel Ambrose   November 19th, 2008 1:45 pm ET

Jack,

This is a personal and private decision that will have to be made by the Obama’s themselves. Given though it would be in the better interest if the Obama kids would attend a private school for obvious reasons.

Daniel,
Atlanta, GA

Howard M. Bolingbrook IL   November 19th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I think this is a clear choice public/private for the Obama’s and no one else. I believe the Obama children in a public school would be a disruption for that school.

Cynthia   November 19th, 2008 1:47 pm ET

I hope that the public will let the Obama’s make the decision that is best for the girls - it’s a personal decision. I’m sure the girls being happy and safe is foremost in the Obama’s mind.

Ingrid, new york   November 19th, 2008 1:48 pm ET

while public school is an ideal and would be a wonderful statement of confidence in the education possible in a public school, these are the president’s children and no matter what one might think, they will be better protected and better shielded in a small private school.

Judy, Exeter, Calif,   November 19th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Like Michelle Obama said, what will determine the type of school the girls attend will be based on what is best for them. That is a private family decision.

Colleen, Charlotte, NC   November 19th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Little Carter went public; little Clinton went Private. It is a decision to be made by The First Momma & The President Elect that is in the best interest of their kids. At least we know they will not be going to private schools on tax payer provided vouchers!

lee in tn   November 19th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

I think this is private ,between the parents and should remain this way.

Jane M   November 19th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Personal decision but I guess I’d pick Private simply for security reasons.

Jane (Minnesota)   November 19th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

That’s up to the Obamas - not the American people. I would hope a school is chosen that make’s the Secret Service’s job as simple as possible to protect them.

Dave, Brooklyn, NY   November 19th, 2008 1:49 pm ET

Obviously they will have to attend a private school. There are still too many crazies running loose, not to mention the odd terrorist or two.

mel from ohio   November 19th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

The Obama children seem to be very bright so they will probably excel wherever they go but to be fair to their classmates and the rest of the school personnel, they should probably go to a private school where they are more used to handling the kinds of sensitive issues that will come up.

JD in NH   November 19th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

I’d feel a whole lot better, security wise, if the girls were in a private school. That’s not a statement on the local, public schools, rather a statement on the hatred and threats found on some web sites. First and foremost the girls must be safe.

Barb New Port Richey Fl   November 19th, 2008 1:51 pm ET

In this day in age? I would probably home school my kids.

David, Tampa, Fl   November 19th, 2008 1:51 pm ET

I think the Obamas should ask the kids which they perfer and use that as a guide in making a final decision along with safety and other considerations. My guess is a private school would be easier to deal with.

Mike S.,New Orleans   November 19th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

I think it would send a message of bi-partisahship if the Obama children were home schooled.

Rob , NYC   November 19th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Thats their personal choice , but the the threats coming towards Obama . Its safer I guess in private school

Clara   November 19th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Private, Jack, for obvious reasons. People may not mind the limo
pulling up into the drop-off / pick-up loop everyday. But the secret
service security check of all lunch bags may be a little to much of a distraction.

Dennis North Carolina   November 19th, 2008 1:53 pm ET

Which every is best for the children.

KarenB, Florida   November 19th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

Public school would present problems for security. (and disruption of class etc for students and teachers overall)
Private school not as much so, since “celebrities” abound in private schools.
or
Make it simple for everyone, “home school” or have tutors at home (White House). Then you don’t have to worry about security on the outside, or disrupting schedules of hundreds of others.

Gary - Woodhaven, Michigan   November 19th, 2008 1:55 pm ET

I do not believe that the Obama’s pay property nor school taxes in the District of Columbia, so a private school would be fairer to the taxpayers of D.C.

Barbara - 65 yr old white female in NC   November 19th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

I believe private school would be best. Partly because of the security, and partly because those children are bright enough that they deserve the best their parents can afford.

Willow, Iowa   November 19th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

There are several private schools in the area of the WH, there is already a good security situation, because of politician’s children there. that would be better for security.

Mark in OKC   November 19th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

Jack, I am a public school teacher in an inner city middle school in OKC. I think the Obama’s would be Crazy to send their sweet daughters to a Washington D.C. public school. There are many great public schools in the suburbs, but as far as inner city schools go, forget it. Besides, the secret service would never permit the Obama girls to be around so many violent students, many of whom have criminal records by 6th grade.

Lil from TN   November 19th, 2008 1:57 pm ET

It’s nobody’s business but President-elect and Mrs. Obama and their girls. I don’t have kids so I can’t speak from experience, but it seems to me that the Obamas know what is best for their own children.

Linda in Florida   November 19th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

Since President Elect Obama wants to focus on public school education, I would like to see them go to public school. However, they attend a private school in Chicago, so I would think they will continue to go to private school in DC.

Chubby, MO   November 19th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

. . . Private. I wouldn’t want them to get beat to a pulp everyday like I did.

Lois, Ont., Canada   November 19th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

A private school for sure. It would be easier for ’security’

Michelle, Ft. Myers, FL   November 19th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

Hi Jack,

I have mixed emotions. I hope they are going to private school. The public school system in D.C. is probably just as useless as the public school systems throughout the country; I teach college freshmen and it’s scary. I have gone into the public school system to observe what goes on in classrooms, and I have found a recurring theme: watered down education. Whatever happened to reading and writing and arithematic…?

However, it could be a good thing for them to attend public school. Maybe their parents will see the real devastation of the education system and real progress can be made in healing this battered, broken, nearly irrepairable system.

vern-t anaheim,ca   November 19th, 2008 1:59 pm ET

while some people believe public schools would be best for the obama kidsi believe a private school would be better for them as it would be easier to provide the necessary secret service protection they require

Larry in Florida   November 19th, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Ithink it goes with out saying that they should attend a privite school. The reason I think that is because it would be easier and less distracting for other children attending privite schools. They will need to have pretty good security at all times because, and I hate to say this, because there are white surpremists and other groups who are making serious threats against Obama. That seems to me would put his daughters in possible peril. We’re talking head strong and dangerous people who as I understand it, will stop at nothing to get President elect Obama. I think the government should put these groups on their terrorist list if they haven’t already. They don’t deserve to be called Americans.

Terry from North Carolina   November 19th, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Jack
This is a private and personal matter of choice to be made by Barack and Michelle Obama. If I were in their shoes I would opt for a private school based on the security issue alone. However this is their choice.

Joe, New york   November 19th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Why not private, he stole enough in donations from anti-Clinton donors to send them to the best schools in the world. Why don’t you talk about something that is news worthy with so many important things going on in the country. This should not even be a question asked.

Myra Becnel   November 19th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Absolutely private school! Not only because this is the environment the girls are use to but mostly for sercurity reasons. These girls are very young and need to be protected.

Myra Becnel
Kaneohe, Hawaii

Brian M. Lion in Sewickley PA   November 19th, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Jack, I’ve been substitute teaching in top notch schools and schools of lesser reputation. The secondary school system is broken. In the several decades that have transpired since I earned my B.A. in Education, not a single new theory or technique has been profered to advance the science of education. Teachers are tired and underpaid. Students are bored and feel as if they are imprisoned. Parents don’t want to pay taxes and want their kids coddled.

What I’ve found to be universally true, kids who are motivated, either by their parents or by that special spark of imagination that exists in the brightest among them, learn in spite of the broken schools.

The Obama girls will do well no matter what school they attend. It’s the several million other students in this coutry I am worried about.

Liz in Towson, MD   November 19th, 2008 2:03 pm ET

Whatever will keep the girls safest and their school sanest. In other words, private.

Gigi in Alabama   November 19th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Private would probably be the best . . . but that is totally a decision to be made by the Obama’s. I’m sure that safety for the girls would be foremost in their minds.

Conor in Chicago   November 19th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

Since when do the rich and powerful send their kids to public school Jack?

Melissa in IN   November 19th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

I don’t know why the Obama’s would even consider public school after their children have been attending private school their entire lives.

My three children all went to private elementary school and then had to move to the public school because our small private school ends with the 5th grade. For 2 of my 3 children (the last is in his final year of private elementary school) public school was a rough transition. The lack of dicipline and respect for adults runs rampant in our public schools and the bad apples make a hard environment for children who want to learn TO LEARN.

Katiec Pekin, IL   November 19th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

I think the Obamas should pick the school that is best for their children. For their safety and intellectual challenge. It is obvious
they are very intelligent, and, security in a smaller school should
be easier to maintain.
Quite frankly, that state of most of our public schools would
not provide either.

Billy G in Las Vegas   November 19th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

the Obama kids currently attend a private school in Chicago and I see NO reason they shouldn’t attend one in Washington. just the security problems with their attending a public school would be a nightmare.

biggest question I have is how do you keep the damn paparazzi from becoming a complete pest no matter which school they attend. you just know those leeches will be thick as flys given the Obama families popularity.

Jolly Potter, NY   November 19th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

I would think in the interests of their personal safety ‘Home Schooling’ would be the appropriate solution with Private Tutoring. They would pose too high a risk particularly in the First Term. second Term maybe an off White House Private School but I am sure the Obamas will make the correct choice - they always seem to.

PC from Atlanta   November 19th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

I am a proponent of public school and I hope the president-elect will work to make the public system better than it is now. But with the fascination that is surrounding the Obama family it may be best for them to attend private school for their privacy and most importantly, safety. Not because public schools are “dangerous”, it’s because there will be nuts out there and a public school would provide a lot more access to the Obama girls than a private school would.

John, Fort Collins, CO   November 19th, 2008 2:11 pm ET

The Obama kids should the school that can offer the best security for them with the least disruption to their classmates. Private schools are probably better equipped to handle these requirements.

earle,florida   November 19th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

The Obama’s children’s educational future should be the Obama’s family decision, period!

me46   November 19th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

No one should send their kids to public school the way they operate today.
Tom
lv

marti thompson   November 19th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Home Schooling is the answer..It would be cheaper to hire a tutor than send them to private school, no motorcade, no secret service at school, no food tester at school, fewer clothes to be purchased ,,,you get the idea……..

Kevin in Dallas, TX   November 19th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

The answer is easy. They should get their kids into the best school they can, whether it’s public or private. After all, if the Obama’s short change their own children, what are they going to do to the rest of us?

Dave in Saint Louis   November 19th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Come on Jack would you place your kids in a DC public school?

Jackie in Dallas   November 19th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Actually, it is none of our business. However, private schools and home schooling have the advantage of better security for those two precious children. If it were up to me, which it is not, I’d opt for a private school, but one with an eclectic school population so that the children are exposed to more than just the children of the uber-wealthy, and which have excellent academic programs. If those two are anything like their parents, they are going to need accelerated programs to keep them challenged and to learn to love to learn.

Larry -- Belton TX   November 19th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

How should I know, Jack? I have not seen security reports nor have I visited any DC school campuses. The decision’s sole criteria is the safety and welfare, along with education, of our new and precious first daughters. Debate outside this sole criteria is ignorant and portrays symbolism over substance. Not this time.

Larry from Georgetown, Texas   November 19th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

The girls should not attend any school in the DC area, they should be home taught and kept out of the lime light. Sure their social skills may suffer a little but not living the life they’ll live for at least the next 4 years. Yes, this is sarcastic. They should attend a private shcool where the kids there are already comfortable with secret service, etc.

Craig, Ocala FL   November 19th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Private school makes the most sense for the safety of the president’s girls. It would be a nightmare for the DC public school system, which allready seems to be in bad shape.

Cindy, CA   November 19th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

A private family decision. My foremost concern is for their personal safety, and that they experience as normal a childhood as possible. I have no doubt that education will always be a respected aspiration in the Obama household, whether gained through the public school system, or a private institution.

Craig, Mission Viejo, CA   November 19th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Private. Besides protection, they deserve the better education since the Obamas can afford it. Let’s not kid ourselves that there is an available public school which can beat the top available private school. His girls will never have a “normal” school experience anyway. So in this case, avoid the temptation to make an empty symbolic gesture and choose based on merit. It would be a more relevant example for the American people.

Jay-San Antonio   November 19th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Simple, it should be what is most comfortable to his family. It is a private matter. many of us chose private schools for different reason such as prayer and intergrated faith.

kathleen , san juan   November 19th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

I wish they could have attended my public school in Vermont. There are many more reasons for relocating the nation’s capital to my home town of Springfield, but for the moment, it sits on the Potomac, and has failed to provide adequate schools for the majority of the local children.

A very high percentage of children in Washington attend private school. If all private schools were closed, and every student attended a local public school, he way they used to in Springfield, the public schools would improve dramatically, with or without No Child Left Behind.

Barack Obama ran on a platform of ‘change’. Give him a chance to change the schools. He was not the Chancellor of the DC school system, nor the Secretary of Education. Why blame him?

If they sent the girls to one of the 2 or 3 good public elementary schools in Washington, DC, wouldnt that be deceptive? Does every family in DC get to pick their favorite public school?

Jeremy Deakins--Columbia, SC   November 19th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Jack,
The Obamas should put their children in private school….only for security reasons. I believe private school students would be more able to handle the distractions and attention that would accompany the presidential daughters in school. If not for the security issues, I would say put them in public school. If I were president I would put my children in public school, but I am not a African American and have not experienced threats on my life and safety!

Michael watching from Canada   November 19th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Jack

Private school….as it should give the new President the greatest peace of mind, thereby enabling him to properly focus on the difficult challenges ahead.

sue   November 19th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

The children shoud attend private school. The DC public education system is one of the worst in the nation.

Obama did not get as far as he has with a questionable education.

We may think it is elite to send your kids to private school but given the choice and having the funds, hey it’s a no brainer!

Steve K.   November 19th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

By the sounds of these comments I’m reading, the public schools in the DC area suck. So why should Obama’s kids get preference.
Public schools in the DC area are 95% black. Private schools in the DC area are 95% white.
It would be slap in the face to all the blacks attending public schools, if Obama does not send his kids to public schools. There should be no privileges to the rich, they’re getting too much already. Obama
should show an example and send his kids to a highly rated public school.

Sid...Texas   November 19th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Private schools should be the only answer…It would take more than the secret service to to handle the every day violence that we are now witnessing in our public schools. Third graders with AK47s in their backpacks?

Mari Fernandez, Salt Lake City, Utah   November 19th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

My own four children attended private Catholics schools. So I vote for private, and agree, that it is a personal decision for the Obamas, thus we such respect their right to choose the school that’s best for their daughters.

GMAN (retired USAF)   November 19th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

As good as it would be for the girls to attend the real world school system, it would be a security nightmare.I am sure the school would be in lockdown everyday and god forbid the girls got in a fight! I would hope they would pick private schooling.

GMAN
Larimore ND

Dawn   November 19th, 2008 2:24 pm ET

Jack, private School should be the only choice.
Given the fact that their Dad will be the President, their safety and well being should not be compromised.
Dawn
Brampton, Ont
Canada

leroy from houston,tx.   November 19th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Most definitely private school. They are better equipped to handle the media onslaught and the day to day security issues.

Mertis   November 19th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

Jack,

Given a vote (Which we have not.) I’d choose a private school. For the children’s safety and to give them the chance to grow up out of the public spot light as much as possible.

Maureen   November 19th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

From Montreal. Public or private school? What a question. If the public system would be up to a respectable standard, this would be a good option. However, from recently reading how deplorable the Washington DC public school system is, totally underfunded, poor resources, what choice does the next “first family” have? None. The girls have been attending a private school in Chicago - we should not criticize the parents for wanting to continue with access to a good education. At the same time, Barak Obama has already said many times that education standards must be brought up to give every child a chance to compete in the global picture. Good luck to them, whatever their decision is.

Roger from Espanola, New Mexico   November 19th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

The choice clearly should rest with Mom and Dad. My own opinion is that the choice of a good private school is probably the best so as to enable the two girls to live more “normal” lives Let’s face facts, these girls don’t have the option anymore of being unknown!

Steve of Hohenwald TN.   November 19th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

What ever he feels most comfortable with.

Bill, Quarryville, Pennsylvania   November 19th, 2008 2:28 pm ET

President Obama and his wife should enroll their children in a school that will give them the best education possible. That would be a private school for which they should not be criticized in anyway. They can afford to send them to a private school and they will be the one paying to send them there. That makes it a private matter and should be no concern to the public. President Carter made the mistake of sending his daughter to a public school sacrificing the child’s happiness just to please the public.

Eileen, Peabody MA   November 19th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Private school.

The private schools in Washington D. C. are very familiar with the security required for high profile children, therefore they will know the ins and outs of the secret service as well as how to vet their friends for sleep over’s. (joke…not much of one….but a joke)

Pat in Chantilly   November 19th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Definitely private school. I live outside of DC and the schools are terrible. I’ve been teaching for 33 years and I would not send my children there.

Ralph, Corpus Christi   November 19th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

As private as possible…

Mike, Syracuse NY   November 19th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

He should send them to private school. He should also expand the voucher program so everyone in the US has that choice too. Charter schools in DC provide a better education for half the cost per student than public schools. Privitize all schools and we’d all have better schools at 50% of today’s school budgets.

Kel in Auburn, AL   November 19th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

I say private. Let’s not make the Secret Service’s job any more difficult than it already is!

Connie from "BLUE" Indiana   November 19th, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Jack, Those two little girls need to go to private school so they can be protected to the fullness. There are a lot of nut jobs out there.

Michael and Diane Phoenix AZ   November 19th, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Has anyone seen some of these public schools? Come on, a private school will be safer for them. Even the so-called “richer” public school districts have their security problems. Things have changed quite a bit since Amy Carter went to public school.

Mickie   November 19th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

Like the public should have anything to say about this question. Parents of any child should have the only say.

ajks   November 19th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

As a public school teacher, I feel it would be great for mainstream children to see the President’s children in a public school. Having said that, I think the security for the President’s girls is paramount–and that would be best achieved in a private school. Private school is the best choice.

Markus from Chicago   November 19th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

They should have the freedom of choosing which ever they find suitable like everybody else.

Matt in Stafford, VA   November 19th, 2008 2:33 pm ET

That is something for the Obama family to decide, not for anyone else. I’m sure they will make the right choice.

ozzi in AZ   November 19th, 2008 2:34 pm ET

I think they should go to a private school.
They have the opportunity to get the best education available and they deserve it and should take advantage of it.

Our public schools need help, and in as much as it would be beneficial for the president to experience the shortcomings first hand, I think having such high profile students and the secret service in a public school would be too disruptive to the other students and they don’t need another challenge to overcome.

Ann from S.C.   November 19th, 2008 2:34 pm ET

The president’s children should attend private schools. Public schools are no match for the U. of Chicago Lab schools they have been attending . Public schools have nothing to offer the intelligence of these two girls. I taught in public schools for 24 of the 34 years I taught, and I watched the schools deteriorate as government demanded accountability for the funds they supplied. Today our public schools have one goal and one goal only: to place well on the acheivement tests. Education has gone down the tubes.

Sandra -- Oklahoma   November 19th, 2008 2:36 pm ET

As much as I would like to say public school. To avoid the accusation of elitism. I have to say private. The security and accompanying chaos that would occur in public school would cause way more distraction than a school could reasonable deal with. It is a shame,too, because I think public schools help children learn to live in the ‘real’ world much better than private school.

Gina in Racine, Wi   November 19th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

After hearing the Obama’s speak about their children and family values…..and then observing them with their children….I think they will make the best decision, in the interest of those sweet little girls, as to which type of school they attend.

The media and the public should stay out of it.

Timothy   November 19th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Private……The kids will go through a lot of scrutiny if they are placed in a Public School. It will change their attitude / personality / among other things.

Timothy

WV

Anne   November 19th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

Whatever their parents think is best for them.

These little girls will be in enough of a fishbowl as it is. Their school, whichever it is, should be a comfort zone.

And, frankly, it’s none of our business where they go to school. That’s a decision for parents.

Anne
Texas

David,San Bernardino,CA.   November 19th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Public School. How can the Obama’s expect to convince Americans that they support public education when their own daughters go to private school at taxpayer expense. Public schools were good enough for my children,they should be good enough for Obama.

Randy in New York   November 19th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Whatever Barack and Michelle Obama thinks is best for the girls is fine with me.

Michael from Greenfield, Wi.   November 19th, 2008 2:38 pm ET

I would prefer public, but the reality’s concerning the security of the children make public school a huge liability that is not worth the political risk. The public will have to just over it that the children are going to a private school.

Jeffrey Cohen from Los Angeles, California   November 19th, 2008 2:40 pm ET

The Obama children should attend the school that they and their parents feel most comfortable placing them in. It shouldn’t matter to the American people whether the Obama girls attend a private or public school because it is not our welfare that is at stake.

Markel Houston   November 19th, 2008 2:40 pm ET

The girls are in private school now. There is no good reason for the girls’ education to suffer. The Obama children are entitled to the best education their parents can afford.

Enrolling the Obama girls in Washington’s public school system would be beneficial to the school system at the expense of the girls’ education. There are some significant improvements that would have to be made to the structures and the staff in order to accomodate the girls’ safety and security concerns.

David P. Vernon   November 19th, 2008 2:40 pm ET

Tucson, AZ - no public school in the DC area is secure. The Obama kids are, at least hypothetically, targets for various kinds of “bad guys.” Only a private school has the money and physical facilities to keep kids who are kidnapping targets safe.

mac from traverse city Michigan   November 19th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

How parents choose to raise their children shouldn’t be a matter of public discourse. If the Obama’s were just wealthy private citizens who were not going to be occupying the white house the answer would be a foregone conclusion. The fact that the wealthy are hesitant to put their kids in public school is an issue the Obama’s can and should address as president and first lady, but they should not be forced to put their children in peril to appease anybody. In addition we the public should be louder in demanding that the sorry state of public education be addressed immediately because most of the public cannot afford quality, secure,private education for our kids.

Tina (Ft Worth)   November 19th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

I am just glad this is not my problem. I lean towards private schools since there is probably less nonsense but every child should experience public schools to see what a mess it is and how their daddy should fix it. What happened to respect that schools used to have? Oh yea. No child left behind. Enough said.

susan from Idaho   November 19th, 2008 2:42 pm ET

They have been attending private schools why break the trend? Their lives will be under so much scrutiny it is best for them to have as much privacy as possible.

Tyson (San Diego, CA)   November 19th, 2008 2:43 pm ET

Lets kill two birds with one stone and hire Senator Hillary Clinton to become their home-school teacher. Technically, that would get her back into the White House and on Obama’s team.

luckylady10   November 19th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

I think whichever choice they make will have an impact on the two girls but perhaps it’s best to go private as they can have more security & deal with kids from similar backgrounds. I’m beginning to think that Obama might be too young for this role but I think America was ready for a black president. I just hope the role doesn’t become too much for them.

Agnes from Scottsdale, AZ   November 19th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

Hi Jack: The Obama girls should attend private school. It’s a fact of life that they will need special protection and care, simply because they are the Presidents kids. Also, why should the local school system be totally disrupted due to their attendance. No doubt they’d get a great local education in the public schools, but there are broader issues to consider in this case. It’s not a matter of rich vs. poor. It’s a matter of what’s practical.

Patrick of Dover NH   November 19th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

Private school. The Secret Service detail would be a distraction to other students in a public school. There would be too much Press at the school every day taking interviews from every student documenting it like a circus. At private school the kids will be able to go to school and learn like normal students, which is the purpose of them going to school. The kids are not going to school to be on display. There is no fish bowl.

Bill Klewitz   November 19th, 2008 2:48 pm ET

Public, like the rest of us that want change! Who can afford private school these days, a tank of gas is just getting affordable again.

Annie Florida   November 19th, 2008 2:51 pm ET

Private…better protection…better acclimation to their father as President and the effects at school.

Tolu - Chicago, IL   November 19th, 2008 2:51 pm ET

Let’s not politicize the future of those young girls…
They were in private schools in Chicago, so they should continue to be in private schools in Washington.

Dale   November 19th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

As to the Obama’s choice of schools……that is entirely their business…….no one else’s. We have far too many people sticking their noses into other people’s lives and telling them what they should or should not do.

Tolu - Chicago, IL   November 19th, 2008 2:53 pm ET

Besides the issue of security, let’s not politicize the future of these young girls…

They were in private schools in Chicago, so they should continue to be in private schools in Washington. Period!

Shannon Wadding, St. Paul, MN   November 19th, 2008 2:53 pm ET

Jack, if Obama represents himself as the man from the street, I vote that Obama’s girls go to public school as ambassadors so they can help fix our failing schools.

nora CC TXAS   November 19th, 2008 2:53 pm ET

It is a private matter for the Obama’s to decide. I would think private for the safety of the children, their life is going to be a circus anyway, maybe a little peace at school would be nice for them. Those are sure two cute little girls, hope they stay unaffected by all the hoopla. I think grandma will help with that also.

debinOH   November 19th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

I think that it is obviously their choice; however for the safety of these girls I think that a private school is the only way they can go. I think that anyone who is offended that they would choose a private over a public school are just seriously nuts! In fact as crazy as the guy who wanted Obama to take a public plane to see his grandmother.

JIM   November 19th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

My buddy Jack Cafferty. Barack Hussein Obama should send his children to public schools. After all, he claims to be the man of the people. He should set the example.

Anj in CA   November 19th, 2008 2:57 pm ET

Why is this the public’s business? The Obamas will make the right decision for their kids, and we should stay out of it.

Robert Smith, Jr.   November 19th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

I think that they should be home schooled or private school. Granted it would be nice for them if they could go to public school but Im sure they could do home school much cheaper than the cost of secret service people and their education would probably be better also.

Kevin, Chester Springs PA   November 19th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

The Obama girls should go to private school. They currently go to private schools in Chicago and there’s no reason to switch to public schools when they move to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. And besides going to public schools would be a security nightmare for the school and its students. DC private schools are better equipped to handle these issues. For folks that think a public education for the girls would show better for Obama, well… get over it. There are more important things on the Obama agenda.

doodshippichik   November 19th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

Sending Malia and Sasha Obama to public schools would be a logistical nightmare for the Secret Service … even if the Obamas wanted to, it just isn’t doable. They clearly are loving, caring parents and want what is best for their girls. In this case, that points to private schools for the First Daughters.

Norah
Ocala, FL

mary   November 19th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

The answer….whatever is best for their family. None of our business!

Marge in New Port Richey, Florida   November 19th, 2008 3:01 pm ET

In Washington, DC? I think it might be one of the worst public school systems in the country. DEFINITELY private. Then they’ll be surrounded by other kids whose parents are politicians and/or rich so they won’t be as big a novelty as they would in a public school. Plus they’ll get more protection which they deserve and unfortunately, will probably need.

Ralph Garner   November 19th, 2008 3:01 pm ET

Thats their business. They are wealthy and will never hobnob with common people so they may as well go to a private school. Perhaps they can achieve an IQ above 130.

Karen - Nashville   November 19th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

Private school, and security isn’t the only reason. Public school teachers are under enough stress without a media microscope focused on them, or having to deal with curious parents and other members of the public. Also, private school teachers in the area will have other high-profile students so they will not become star-struck themselves.

Sarah   November 19th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

Unfortunately the biggest consideration in this decision is their security, so the choice to go private is almost a foregone conclusion. Although this is obvious it won’t stop some people, like the rightwing radio hosts, from jumping on this when it’s announced and lambasting their choice. It’ll be another sign of Obama’s ‘elitism’

Brian from Fort Mill, SC   November 19th, 2008 3:03 pm ET

We are talking about Washington, DC, right?

‘Nuff said!

carol in Oregon   November 19th, 2008 3:04 pm ET

Is he just like us or is he an Elitist ? Their choice will tell us. I think they are elitist and will choose a private school. Jimmy Carter chose public. Clintons private.

Ken in NC   November 19th, 2008 3:04 pm ET

It should be a private matter for the Obama’s to make. They should make the decision they consider to be in the best interest of “THEIR” girls. We made the decision for our daughter based on what was best for her and available to us. They are no different from us in that respect. There are some parents that do not have that choice available to them so they go with what is within their range.

The girls are already in Private School so it is my opinion that they should continue in an environment that they are familiar and comfortable with. When considering what is best for the girls, safety is always an issue so I am confident they will take into consideration any and all input from the Secret Service.

Unfortunately there are those among us that will have a difference of opinion and they are entitled to their opinion. They may not agree with the decision of the Obama’s but they are not responsible for the continued growth of the Obama girls. I just hope that people will understand that this is a family decision.

Dan from Kitchener   November 19th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

Private as regular public to hard to police for the children’s safety.

Maddy, WV   November 19th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

Private….as in the Whitehouse, with tutors/security. I worry alot.

Michael - Minnesota   November 19th, 2008 3:07 pm ET

I will agree that this is a private matter, however, as an educator, I feel that if they decide on a Private School President Obama will need to look at the reasons he chose not to go with public, and assess what needs to be done to fix these faults.

Katty OR   November 19th, 2008 3:08 pm ET

Silly question - of course it has to be Private School for all the obvious reasons…..just ask Amy Carter.

Cori from Colorado   November 19th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Has anyone asked his daughters what they want? Besides, this is a family matter, not a matter of public opinion.

Lauri, Baltimore MD   November 19th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Frankly, it’s none of our business where they go to school. If there was ever such a thing as a “private family matter” this would be it. That said, hasn’t Bristol Palin married her baby’s father YET?

Jeff from Sturgis, MI   November 19th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Option #3: Home-school them.

Jwal, Tx   November 19th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

As a parent myself, I believe that the Obama’s should seek whatever school their children will be comfortable with, considering the whole family, with the utmost security being the number one priority, and secondly their education. It is a parent’s decision, and no one else, period. Either choice will and should be respected. If they choose private, it should not be a surprise to anyone, since they currently attend private school in Chicago.

Anna, Missouri   November 19th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

I am old enough to remember how the media burst into the lives of former children of Presidents and we all know they would do anything to get a “scoop” now. Just because he is President it doesn’t mean we, the American people, have the right to know everything about his kids. They are not in public office. Private schools are much more capable of protecting these kids.

As far as the people that think he should put them in public schools to make a political statement, I have to ask, what kind of idiot would want any child to be put in harms way just to make a political statement?

Ginger H -- West Melbourne, FL   November 19th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

That’s a definite dilemma for the Obamas. I can see why the President-elect would want to put them in public school because he wouldn’t want to send the wrong message by sending them to private school; however, I think that most of us would understand the need to protect these girls who didn’t choose this life. Those who would condemn him for sending them to private school would probably find something else negative to say anyhow, so I think the most important thing is protecting these girls. DC schools don’t offer much protection, and imagine what a distraction it would be to the rest of the students. They need to go to private school. It’s OKAY.

Matt from Albuquerque   November 19th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

This decision is really none of our business. It is the right & responsibility of the parents, in this case the President-Elect & his wife, to decide as they see fit.

Dilibon   November 19th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

Public school would be a political statement. Obama should stay away of acting with his kids in such a manner to simply make a politicla statement. hwo in Americ awould be making more than 250k with a wife who was earning more than 150k would enroll hsi kids in a public school? It just does not make any sens. The kids needs to attend school with their peers, with student swith identical incomes as their parents. In addtion, a public school would be more flexible when it comes to security. Michelle should understand that the risks to those children are much higher than any other kids and their protection should be the priority! Private school all the way Mr. and Mrs. Obama. Let the political critics say whatever they want btu you will have your kids after the presidency prepared to takeover where you left off!!

Linda in Bisbee, AZ   November 19th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

What could possibly be gained by sending them to a public school? They will be easier to protect and will get a better education in a private school. I just know the Obamas can figure this out without our input.

Sharon   November 19th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

If they were my children I would opt for private school.

Mike, Albuquerque, NM   November 19th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

The presence of the Presidents children in a public school would put the other children at risk in the event of a kidnapping or attack.

Sue   November 19th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

The place for the girls should be where they could feel and be treated
the same as their peers.

Lois from Pittsburgh   November 19th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

Hi Jack,
This is a private family matter, however for the safety of President-elect Obama and Mrs. Obama daughters, private school. I have had experience with public school, as a step-mom. What a change from when I attended public school. Teachers should be able to teach without constant disruptions and concerns with the violence that often accompaines these episodes. My step-son attended private school for several years and did wonderful. My husband and I sold our home moved to a different area of Pittsburgh. He once again attends public school where we now reside, the atmosphire is so much better. I no longer dread going to this school, as I did in the city, where everytime I entered it was necessary to be searched.

Lois from Pittsburgh PA

Bruce St Paul MN   November 19th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

If the secret service tried to hang around a public school, they’d probably get arrested. Then there would be a battle over jurisdiction and it would get ugly. Who needs that?

David Bakody, Dartmouth NS   November 19th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

What is best for children putting all influences aside.

Bob D, Morristown, NJ   November 19th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

I’m disappointed that you would ask such a question. It’s none of my business. That said I’m certain that the only criteria that will be used is what’s best for the children given the extraordinary efforts inappropriate people will make to gain access to them.

Jackie in Dallas   November 19th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Joe, New york
____________
Why not private, he stole enough in donations from anti-Clinton donors to send them to the best schools in the world.
____________

He didn’t steal any from me. I’m neither anti-Clinton nor a Republican, but an Independent. However, I sent several small donations to Obama’s campaign (all I can afford after 8 years of Bush) because I believe in his desire for unity and an end to partisan and non-productive business-as-usual in Washington.

As for campaign donations, he cannot use them for private expenses such as his children’s education. That was part of the stink with the Palin/wardrobe situation. And he doesn’t need to…he has several books out, both of which have been on Best Seller lists. He made his money that way. He also has had his salary for the Senate.

Bill in Michigan   November 19th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

While I am an advocate of public education with parental involvement, I think it is in the best interest of the Obama children to attend a private school for security and safety reasons.

Jerry from Jacksonville   November 19th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Due to security reasons they should be in a private school, it would be alot easier to protect them there. With all the nut bags running around today they need to be in an area that they can be protected against anyone wanting to do harm to them.

Rob C.   November 19th, 2008 3:26 pm ET

It’s totally up to the parents but if it were my children then a private school would be best. Being the 1st KIDS is going to be tough enough but throw in Secret Service at a public school and stand back all the disruption of all normal activities. Maybe attending a school where the Congressmen/women send thier kids would be better.

Chryssa   November 19th, 2008 3:26 pm ET

The decision needs to be made not on the way the school is labeled, but on the quality of the teachers and resources. I’m sure the Obamas feel the same way and will base their decision on what’s best for the girls, not how prestigious it may sound.

Boise, ID

BG, Seattle WA   November 19th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

While this should remain a family decision, given the rise in hate activities since the election I believe a private school is best. Besides, the girls were already attending private schools. They should not be used as experiments or to highlight problems within the education system. We should view their safety and education as more important than various special interests.

Mark   November 19th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Jack.
It does not matter what school President elect Obama sends his girls to. Private school will be paid for out of his or Michelle’s salary. Public school is paid for by the DC taxpayers. Also where they feel provides the best education for their children is their business and theirs alone. It is definitely none of mine nor anyone else’s. Wherever they end up the Secret Service will have their hands full keeping the 1st children safe in a school environment

L.M.,Arizona   November 19th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

Whichever provides the most protection for Obama’s kids and their fellow students. Home school should not be taken off the table. The fact is that nothing will ever be a typical day for this family.

L.M.,Arizona

Chris, Olean, NY   November 19th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

Jack, what we think is totally irrelevant. This is a family decision for the Obama’s to make, and we should respect their decision.

Janice Illinois   November 19th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

They should go where they will be safe from harm. That would be the first priority.

LYNDA in CT   November 19th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

No doubt here, PRIVATE.
There, they will be secure and safe. They won’t be part of the circus if they attend public schools.

Joe in MO   November 19th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Whatever their parents choose.

Debby   November 19th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

The Obama children should attend public school. How else can the new President observe what’s really going on in the public school system? It would allow him to see up close and personally what the majority of parents in America are dealing with.

Debby
Cleveland, TN

Michael, Toronto, CANADA   November 19th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

It’s none of our business what school the Obama’s send their girls. That is a question for the Obama family. I think the public demands too much information from our public officials, can’t we just leave the kids alone?

Dan, Chantilly VA   November 19th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

The public schools in DC proper are some of the worst in the nation. Unless he plans on driving his kids out to Maryland or Virginia every day, I’d say go with private. A political statement isn’t worth the safety, security, and future of your children.

F Machado - Connecticut   November 19th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

I think it is up to Obamas make the decision.

They should make the decision based on what they think it is the best for their girls.

If they think public is better, go for that, otherwise go send them to private school.

Of course either decision they make will be criticized by the media.

If they send the girls to private school, they will say they don’t trust the public school system or something else. It they go to private the media will say they are snob or something else.

Let them decide

Joyce   November 19th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

Private matter, private schools. Safety is a key issue.

Pat,Lexington, Ky.   November 19th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I have heard that at least some Wash. D.C. public schools are horrible. But beyond that I think the girls’ safety is of paramount importance, and I believe private school would fill that bill better.

Russell, Seattle, WA   November 19th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

I’m reminded of an episode of The West Wing where Zoie was abducted creating a nightmare scenario. What if such a thing were to happen to one or both girls? It is not just a matter of sending a politically correct signal; the matter is much more complicated than that. There is the security of the girls, the security of other children, the integrity of the Presidency and National Security risks to consider. In a perfect world it would make no difference. It’s not a perfect world so I would vote that the girls be placed in a discreet private school.

ejmounsey Granville Ohio   November 19th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

The girls safety must be the only factor. EJM Granville Ohio

Michael, Pensacola, FL   November 19th, 2008 3:38 pm ET

The American dream is to be able to send your family to the best schools, best hospitals, the best anything and everything you can afford. If he’s paying for it, let him send them to private school because right now that is the best.

Paul Round Rock, Texas   November 19th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

It should be up to the Obama’s to make a choice of schools for their children. It should also be a school that will have the least impact of sercret service with the children at all times. The childrens safety comes first.

Sharon P.   November 19th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Personally, their parents decision but, they should be where they are safest while their parents,are now unable to be at their every whim as they are as used to in the past. They should be #1- SAFE, #2- Well educated. Their parents will decide whats in the best intrest of the family unit. Westboro, MO.

Bella from Naples   November 19th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Hi Jack
This is a no-brainer. The
girls have been in private school.
They are moving (difficult) to a new
city and home. They should definitely
be going to private school again, as a bridge.
I hope for the best for them.

Lenore in Kansas   November 19th, 2008 3:41 pm ET

For security reasons alone, a President’s children must now attend private schools. All other considerations are trumped by that. It would be great if our public schools were better and safer– and the nation must get busy and make that happen. Maybe this decision will throw more light on the plight of our schools.

Jay in Texas   November 19th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

While I agree with other comments saying this is a private decision that can and should only be made by the parents, I would imagine that the children would be best-served going to a private school.
Brownwood, Texas

yvette   November 19th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

I think that the President Elect Obama and Michelle should be able to enroll their children where ever they choose just like the rest of us. My first thought however was that if the girls went to a public school, how would the other children adapt to secret service and other people and procedures that may be uncomfortable. But then again, how do children at private schools adapt? Whatever school they choose, perhaps the number enrolled should matter in addition to how well the school’s teachers, programs, and other benefits are.

Lene' , IL   November 19th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Of course this is a personal decision and the Obama’s I am sure will make the right choice for their children. I am sure they will probably choose to send them to a private school for the security of their girls as well as other children. I am sure another factor would be to keep them out of the public eye as much as possible so they can lead a somewhat normal life and so they are not exploited by the media.

I. B., Rocky Mount, North Carolina   November 19th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Security would be my first concern. Where can they best be protected? My second concern would be education. What school would present the best opportunity for a well rounded education. Therefore, I would say a private school. Public school would be a security nightmare. Education in a private school is a lot more flexible than a public school.

Doug Zalesky   November 19th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Just like any other family, where they decide to send their two delightful daughters to school is no one’s business but their own. People in this country that throw a fit about where they choose to send them to school at need to get a life, take care of their own affairs and stay out of other peoples lives. Even though they are the first family they still are a family and need to be treated with respect and privacy, just like other families expect to be treated.

Doug Zalesky
Hesperus, CO

Joan from Binghamton,NY   November 19th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

I think that they should go to Private School. There are too many ignorant people out there and their kids listen to their racist ways. The parents of the children should choose what they believe is best for their children at this time. People will state their opinion no matter what their decision is.

Michael "C" Lorton, Virginia   November 19th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Jack: Do you actually think that the President elect is going to place his daughters in public school in Washington D.C.? You already know the answer to that—-it will be private.

Harold from Anchorage,AK   November 19th, 2008 3:48 pm ET

Neither.Home-schooling would be perfect. The White House has good security,and those children couldn’t find a brighter teacher than Michelle and Barack

Paula (Indiana)   November 19th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

I have a great deal of confidence in Ma & Pa Obama. I am sure whatever they decide will be done after weighing all the options and discussing the matter thoroughly. I am sure the Obamas will include the girls in the discussion to give them a voice in making the choice. Optimum security for the children has to be one of the main deciding factors. I vote for private school. I love our new first family… As a citizen, I want each of them well protected. The whole world is counting on them to lead us out of these trying times.

David in Raleigh, NC   November 19th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

If Obama is really for Change. He should send his daughters to public school.

yvonne   November 19th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

For security reason private school would be the best choice plus a radical change does not have to be added to the change they are already having.

Yvonne Arecibo, Puerto Rico

Allison Anderson   November 19th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

I know what the Obama’s are going through? I too am trying to make that decision for my two girls here in Washington, DC. It is a daunting task to determine what type of school environment, whether it be public or private (or in the case of Washington, charter) that will be best for your child. In any event, it is an extremely personal decision. First and foremost, Michelle and Barack are their parents and will decide what is the best environment for their girls. They should not be second guessed on whatever decision they make.

Diane Dagenais Turbide   November 19th, 2008 3:51 pm ET

Dear Jack,

does not matter what people think since this is a personal choice since only the parents have the freedom to choose themselves what is best for their children!

CJ in Atlanta, GA   November 19th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Private school. The Obama kids have gone to private school all along, the family can afford to do so, so send them to private school.

John   November 19th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Public schools!
Why should Mr. and Mrs. Obama be shouldered with the financial
burden of educating their children……It takes a Village, remember?

Oh yeah…. I guess /this too/ will be “Change we can all believe in”

arilion (from NY)   November 19th, 2008 3:53 pm ET

There are 2 excellent public schools that the children could benefit from. Moreover, the public school selected, could benefit from the needed funds spent on security required to safeguard students. While this would be a challenge for the 24 hour security detail, the US Secret Service is trained for such challenges.

LM from Fayetteville, NC   November 19th, 2008 3:53 pm ET

PRIVATE for their safety.

Dianne, TX   November 19th, 2008 3:53 pm ET

This matter belongs to their parents. I understand the girls were in private schools in Illinois. I donot belive it is our decision. Let those little girls alone. Those little girls donot have to be ambassadors to anyone. We did not expect it of the Bush girls and rightly so. That decision is entirely their parents.