RAISE TAXES

Jack,
Neither. To do both would be wrong. The root of the problem is to eliminate useless job within the governament. Raising taxes is never good and to cut critical services is something that will eventually come back to hurt the people who need them. If a quick fix is needed, I recommend that each state stop wasteful spending and eliminate these “perks” and “bennies” that comes with such entity.

Daniel,
Atlanta, GA

Maintainging a high level of service is worth the price of the taxes paid. Notice that industry does not flock to Florida with its low taxes and poor schools and government services. They do flock to Oregon, California and Massachusetts. It is good for any economy to have somewhat higher taxes and excellent services in exchange.

The voters in Massachusetts just defeated a plan to eliminate the state income tax. If it had passed, it would have decimated aid to schools, police, fire, the library systems, and hospitals.

Cutting taxes seems like a good idea until you see the consequences.

The answer to that question is directly related to your tax bracket.

It’s not a matter of choice. I think they are going to have to do both. We are not going to see a turn around in this economy for quite some time, and I’m sure by 2012 the Obama administration will be blamed for the mess, as the republicans are already trying to do while they slip out the back door with our money in hand.

Jack–
That’s a hard one. Neither option is a good one for the economy. My state, Ohio, is in money trouble in a couple of areas. I suspect that the state will cut services before it raises taxes. But it may end up having to do both. An ugly situation.

Troy, Ohio

The states will have to cut services a little but can’t possibly cut enough to cover most shortfalsl. Not a good time to raise taxes - god time to plug loopholes. A lot of states could go a long way toward solvency by stopping benefits to illegals. Most will simply run-up a defict if allowable.

South Carolina needs to raise the cigaret tax, which is the lowest in the country. If the money were used for nothing else except health services, it would benefit the state enormously.

Oxford, MS

I would prefer that they cut useless spending and unneeded services. In these economic times, I think that we need to try doing more things for ourselves.

I would like to see states trim their programs instead of doing away with them completely. Everyone needs to tighten their belts. The tax payers can’t afford to pay higher taxes right now.

Why must it always be either or? A lot of wasted spending out there Jack!

I would rather the state raise taxes by taxing Church property. That would bring in sufficient funds and take care of some other problems. If the churchs have enough money to spend on political activities such as passing propositions, etc. they can contribute toward paying their way.

Just cut out the waste.
Mike

raise taxes is the american way

This state needs to cut services first starting with going to one legislative body instead of house & senate - can everyone spell gridlock????? Minnesota’s income taxes are already high enough not to mention the sales tax & gas tax ……….My state’s legislature needs to learn to live on a budget too - they haven’t been able to do it much since Jesse Ventura left office.

Raise taxes. It’s like going to the dentist - painful - but the mature thing to do. Plus, I can’t think of any services left to cut.

Dean

We are going to get both. There is only so much money and if keep bailing out the failing economy the money has to come from somewhere. Yes, we will see service cuts AND higher taxes, no matter what any candidate said, someone has to pay and that someone is us.Of course if we personally go belly up, no one is going to bail us out.

I would prefer my state cut services, you ride by a lot of these state funded jobs most of the time and there are at least 4 to 12 people just standing around. At the very least, cut some of the non-working work force.

Tax the rich they get richer and richer while we get poorer and poorer .The poor and middle class can’t handle any more of the burden that the Bush and friends have put on us.

I would prefer my state cut services, you ride by a lot of these state funded jobs most of the time and there are at least 4 to 12 people just standing around. At the very least, cut some of the non-working work force. Georgia

i believe they should cut all unnecessary programs but keep all the important ones,all of us need to cut back whenever possible

I’d rather they do whatever is necessary to keep them rich and fat. That’s what they’ll do anyways so I might as well accept it.

Jack, I have no problem paying more taxes. Of course, having lost my $80,000 a year job three months ago and still being unemployed, it doesn’t make much difference to me right now.

Aren’t we already suffering enough? This would be a bad idea. We don’t deserve to have taxes raised. To have services cut would make sense only if there is restructuring to make better use of spending.

cut the top jobs wages and expence accounts, for a change see if they like it, same with the auto industry

If you leave this question up to the public in a few months from now they will likely vote to raise taxes since over half of them won’t have any jobs or income so they aren’t the ones who will have to pay.

Raise taxes–my wasteful unnecessary program or job is someone else’s critical and essential program or job.

It might be ok to raise taxes,as long as the government does not tell you that they will raise taxes, because they can not see into future. They might not have to or they might not. Who in Washington,D.C. has the crystal ball?

The states need to cut the services and budgets, not raise taxes! Lets be realistic here, the states have already raised taxes repeatedly over the years and we still have budget shortfalls with regularity, even in the “good times”. Rather than taxing us more the states need to streamline or reduce services to be the most financially prudent as they can be. I shouldnt be required to pay for the states lack of ability to control its spending or the in-efficiencies that have come along with that spending to date. It’s not like I can go to my boss and say “I over spent this month/year so you will give me a raise to pay for my inability to properly budget or get the most out of my money.” , so why should the state be able to essentially do that to its citizens? If I dont make enough money thru my employer I need to perform my job at a higher. more efficient level to warrant such a pay raise…..the state is no exception to this philosophy in my opinion.

It has already raised my taxes and cut my services – it has done so each year I’ve lived here! I’m not sure what’s left to cut or how much more I can pay. Jack, you work here. Don’t you remember the old slogan New York – Land of Taxes!

I would rather have neither occur. We do things differently in Texas. We have no state income tax. If we didn’t have all the Federal Taxes we could all be much better off.
The Federal Government will never do anything for you cheaper then you can do it for yourself. Ever!!

When ever the subject comes up the items cut are the ones that hurt the people make us suffer.. They never cut the wastfull boards, and other agencies that have only to make our lives more difficult. They are mostly to employ polititions that have left their jobs, or pay back for services rendered. They serve no useful function.

tough question. considering my state recently raised our sales tax to 7% under the guise that it was lowering our property taxes, I would say cut services at this point. I can’t afford to be taxed any more. I am already paying for myself and many other people to have health care, to stay in their homes, and now to help the wealthy avoid an increase in property taxes. I would like to put my kids through college at some point. incedentally my property taxes didn’t go down.

I would rather my State start taking an in depth look at themselves, then we can look how we enter the equation.

State governments are no more than corporations that have been fiscally and systemically dysfunctional for to many years. The measuring stick is, as long as there is such a high level of bureaucracy there is a high level of dysfunction.

As citizens we must demand they fix themselves before we accept a loss of services or an increase in taxes.

How about lowering taxes on the people who have been sucked dry over the last 8 years and giving back some of the services that have already been cut. Tax the freeloading billionaires to get whatever money is needed.

I think they should do a line item veto of the entire budget. Get down to the bare bones of the budget. Then add back into the budget the things we need. If we need to raise taxes then, so be it. but we would know that all the gravy was off of the train. I have no problem with raising taxes if its for important things we need. In my town the county raised school taxes so that every child in the school system pays no fees for books, etc. That’s the kind of tax raise I don’t mind paying.

Hi Jack:

Well CA is a mess as usual. I doubt cutting services would do it. We need to kick out most of the State Assembly and replace them. And start investigating them for abuse of public funds.

Ron San Diego

i do not mind paying taxes, the part i don’t like is the way they spend the taxes,

i payed 25% of my income to taxes all my life, when there was a tax cut i still payed 25% but when there was a tax hike i got that, and i did not make alot 30 to 50 k

Jack, it shouldn’t be a choice of cutting services or raising taxes. We should get rid of the idiots who put us in this situation in the first place.

Change the manner in which taxes are collected. Cut loopholes for corporations. Make sure that those collecting dividends while sitting by the pool pay their share. I recommend something like a 1% tax on sales of stocks, commodities, dirivitives, money markets and other exchanges. A tariff on cars and appliances would help restore our manufacturing base. We should also halt the privitisation of the military and government services. Cutting the fat out of all agencies is, of course, a given.

States should not cut services. They hae already cut too many due to the Federal Government cutting funds in all areas. If we have to raise taxes, it should be done on the upper income brackets.

Cut non essential services. Raising taxes will encourage folks to spend even less. Also the banks that were given bailout money should be held accountable as to how they are spending that money. How they could have been given this money without preconditions is beyond me! Congress had better not make the same mistake going forward.

Jack, we should not have to choose between cutting services or raising taxes. We should get rid of the idiots who put us in the situation in the first place.

Erik
McDonough, GA

Neither. States could go the distance simply by getting rid of staff and programs that do not provide services to taxpayers.

I say raise taxes and eliminate waste in government. If California cuts state services one more time, it amounts to eliminating them. Yes, get rid of wasteful spending, but quit nickel and diming the essential services like schools. Infrastructure and health care. Taxes are the dues we pay to belong to this wonderful country and its falling apart. Anyone that thinks it’s too expensive to live here needs to live elsewhere.

Jack
Cut services,cut expenditures, cut wages and stop entitlements across the board.

Jack,
Our state of Illinois is in a mess financially and politically. We have a battle of the parties going on and nothing positive is being initiated or done for our state. We need to wipe the slate clean and get in
a government that can work together and for the welfare of our
state. Sound familiar?
I do not see how they can help but cut services and raise taxes.
Or, they could cut expenses??
Dream on,

The answer isn’t black and white. There should be some services cut, but taxes should be raised some as well.

I would say that my state should cut services, but since Bobby Jindal became governor, we don’t have any.

Raise the taxes and increase the services. People who can afford to pay should be paying and increasing services will increase employment which in turn will increase spending.

The fact is you can’t save your way out of a recession. When people lose jobs and quit spending you got a real problem. Keep the money circulating and not just in the hands of a select few.

Both! Why deviate from the plan of the last 28 years.

The reality is that big broke California could cut out A LOT before it actually would have to reduce services. I’d like to see what the options are AFTER they get rid of the waste and incompetence.

Some services can be reviewed but taxes will certainly need to be raised. To think anyone or any group is beyond some kind of sacrifice
would be rather naive indeed. On the other hand, humanitarian needs and decency should not be sacrificed while corporate exucatives are getting millions of dollars in severance pay

I think that states will have to do a little of both.

We have been an “I want it all but not pay for it” society for too long. Our country is a mess with outdated roads and bridges, an education system that doesn’t teach our kids well, no middle income full time jobs, and no health coverage for millions of Americans including part time workers (because part time eliminates the requirement for benefits. If we are to get our country back, we must ALL pay for it–if that means higher taxes, then so be it.

Jack
This new crop of elected officials will be overwhelmed by the magnitude of this finanicial crisis we are in. They will cut services and raise taxes. I dont see them having any choice, we will have to tough it out. Cant have your cake and eat it Jack.

I do not think we need to cut Services. Just cut the waste by streamlining the programs. We can cut billions out of the Medicare drug plan for seniors that the drug companies so nicely wrote for us.. These drugs can be bought and sold much cheaper just by changing the way they are bought and sold. People that are well off do not need Social Security Retirement checks. And since Iraq now has Billions of dollars in Government surplus, they can start paying their own tab. Now for a more radical idea; How about eliminating the middle man, known as Wall Street, and let us invest directly into companies without the manipulation. I would be more than happy to share these ideas with the next Administration. There has not been anyone home at the current one for eight years.

Slash budgets where they can. Raise sin taxes on cigarettes and liquor. And then get on the bread line that is the Treasury department these days and get a piece of all that bailout money being handed out for the remainder. If that doesn’t work, give every elected official 3 months off without pay. That should do it!

I hope Michigan increases services to the homeless as most of us who live here will be needing them soon. Raising taxes would be futile here because people without jobs don’t pay taxes.

Cut unnecessary services. There are people without jobs or that can never work, It would not be right to cut the services. that they receive. There is too much unnecessary help In government offices.

I would prefer that they cut services. Many state jobs are unnecessary and handed out in return for political favors. Save the people some money and cut services instead of raising taxes.

I don’t want to wait at the MVD for hours to register my car and there are hundreds of examples of services that are taking away because of tax cuts. California voted to cut taxes and now they are asking for bailout money of course those people who voted for the cuts moved to other states.I’ll take services over tax cuts any day.Tax cuts started the our debt ridden society. Just say if you it want it pay for it.

L.M.,Arizona

States don’t have to cut services. All they need to do is have a 12/7 day work week. No change in the number of hours for people working, just stagger their days and time off so state services are available 7 days a week 12 hours a day. Just like broadcasters and millions of other workers have been doing their entire lives. This 9 to 5 stuff.for state workers is garbage. Aren’t they supposed to be dedicated public service workers?

While I do not want to pay more money, I think we need to learn to accept higher state taxes. Where I live it’s laughable. Roads, schools, and basic maintenance projects cannot be completed. It’s getting ugly over here. The money has to come from somewhere, and right now taxes seem like the only way.

How many billions of dollars could be saved if 20 million illegal aliens were deported? Enforcing the laws of the land would be where to start. Stop threatening to stop federal money to sanctuary cities. Do it.

Dear Jack

I live in Florida, and they have done both.

Actually we havesuch an exodus of people for these reasons that I have read that there are more than 30% less tourists today than last year.

This is simple Jack. The answer is neither. Taxes need not be increased nor services cut if the governor of each state would cut the number of nonessential employees and cut wages 10%.

They should cut services.. Once taxes are raised they never come down.

Add Alternative Minimum Tax for corporations- talk about closing corporate loop holes, this would do it. If they move offshore, add a penalty or a duty to their products.

I would say raising taxes would be acceptable IF, all subsidies to business were canceled, corporate tax breaks were canceled, the payment to advertising for the Lotto was restricted to 10% of proceeds and the “Administrative heavy” was changed to a “Teacher heavy” educational system were tried first. Lynn, CA

It has to be a combination of both. Barack should look at the entire budget, line by line as promised in his campaign, and cut everything that isn’t worthwhile. This should be done straight away to help reduce the deficit. Raising taxes is more problematic with the economy as it is. I believe it’s right to immediately realign back to rates paid during Clinton’s administration but nothing more until we come out of this recession.

Neither should be necessary, but I’d grit my teeth and pay more taxes. I think too much money is wasted. Graft. Frivolous lawsuits. “Roads to nowhere.” The big problem is the promises politicians on every level have to make to get into office. We end up paying the price.

I agree with Barb in Florida, Jack.. When it comes to government it should never be EITHER / OR. Cut the ‘fat’… Cut the ‘pork’. There is sooooo much waste, we must start there.

A little common sense beats anything I’ve seen lately.

Ha ha ha ha ha. Im from Maryland and you have to ask that question?
Our State is already tax crazy and thats why baby boomers and major corporations are leaving it for Delaware and places South. Our State went from a billion dollar surplus to a billion dollar deficit under the Democrats in 4 years. E Raise Taxes? Its gonna happen no matter what.

Jack: When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I’ve never tried before. Either way—we all get screwed.

Raise taxes. How can we as a people want or think we should go forward, with the country being in the financial shape it is, without accepting the fact that we as citizens should expect to pay more in taxes.

To think otherwise is unrealistic.

Raise taxes or cut services? Are community has done both, but if they don’t help the auto workers and retireree neither one will help in our area. They didn’t mind sharing the wealth when things were good and spending the money we paid in taxes now when we need help, they want to run the other direction and turn their back on us. Do you think
they ever consider if Americans loose every thing who will keep this country running and pay their over price wages.

Now we hit the real problem. What to cut. Can’t cut everything or we will go back to septic tanks, candles, and dirt roads. Bottom line is, if wasteful spending was eliminated, we woulnd’t need to raise taxes. My opinion is to only allow spending on services that affect the majority of its citizens during a major cutback.

Neither. Instead they should invest money into building a time machine, go back in time, prevent George W. Bush from winning the presidency, and make sure those greedy wall street thugs play by the rules so they don’t tear down the economy with their reckless investments! Oh if only it were that easy.

Both, but wisely, please.

Jack,
I hope my state does a little of each. There are, no doubt, some programs that are not as effective as others and could be cut. There are unfunded liabilities that should be cut to the level of actual funds. I would agree to paying more taxes for a set period of time that cannot be extended.

Rich Green
San Clemente. Cal.

Hi Jack,

like any family doing their own budget…you cut expenses that are not essentials to your survival!~

A deficit can be seen as a bad thing if you spend on stupid things but investing in education and in the environment would be the smart thing to do now!

first of all services that don’t work and fraud should be the first to go..you would not believe the people i have heard of that are defrauding state services and worst of all the state doesn’t seem to care..i guess if that isn’t enough then taxes will have to be raised..it’s just too bad that the people who play by the rules are the ones who have to suffer the most.

Both - cut out non-essential services, and raise taxes. Spending more than we take in never works. Didn’t anyone realize this? Why do we keep paying people who aren’t doing their jobs, and if the trend continues, where can I sign up for one of those jobs?

We all need to move to Alaska. They have oil. They pay their people rather than their people paying them.

personally, i don’t care about cutting taxes or raising them because all of us are going have to pay regardless..

That is a catch 22. There are certain services that are sorely needed and the majority of people who will be stressed with higher taxes. You could flip a coin and hope for the best.

Cutting services is like skipping oil changes and tune-ups on a car. It saves money in the short-term, but the whole thing breaks down soon after that.

Raise taxes! I am tired of riding on roads with huge potholes in Georgia!! How do Americans expect that we pay our bills in this country, if we do not pay higher taxes…China is not going to continue to foot our bills for us, they have already footed our two wars.

I’d rather see taxes raised because my state has already cut services to the bone. Or better yet, how about some of that bail-out money going to the states for infrastructure and road projects to help boost the economy instead of funneling it into banks buying banks and Wall Street fat cats using the largesse for spa retreats.

In my state there is a desperate need to not just raise taxes, but to alter the tax base as well. We’ve been subjected to budget cuts which have begun to affect already underfunded public services.My state government has a tendency to not only put all it’s eggs in one basket, it also lies to itself about how large the basket is.

Hey, where I live we get no services from the government ….no water, no sewer, no street lights, no trash pick-up (we pay for that),not even paint on the roads (but in Pennsylvania, it is hard to tell). Sad to say but the police protection is almost non-existent . So, go ahead Pennsylvania, cut more services for my tax dollar. We’ve got nothing to lose!

How about doing BOTH at the same time? We might actually break even some day doing that.

I think we should have an option of paying higher taxes or contributing in some other way — productive community services, etc.

There is nothing wrong with increasing taxes and increasing spending to get out of the current financial crisis. However, spending money trying to run other countries around the world should be terminated immediately.

Tax the people in your country and spend the tax money in your country and you might just be surprised how well that will work out for your country.

In Arizona there are not to many of us left working. Raising taxes on us (the retired few on social security) would not get much income and services in Arizona are at rock bottom now. Your choice!!!

They need to first cut their spending before they should be able to raise taxes. Isn’t the deficit proof of this?

Are those the only choices? In Minnesota, we have had a no- taxes Governor and a bridge that fell down. Now that it’s been replaced, we can take comfort in the fact that we now have one safe bridge. But how about all the other bridges? Infrastructure does not stop crumbling during a recession.

The worse thing to do in a recession is to raise taxes (except on items such as cigarettes, liquor, luxury items, etc). The states are going have to trim down on services that won’t adversely affect the economy or place further burdens on the poor. We are all in this together and tens of millions of Americans, rich, middle income and poor are going to suffer in the short and long term.

Neither Jack.
Let’s face it. Sometimes it is necessary to wisely employ deficit spending. If our current situation does not apply, what does?
Don, Dallas

States should do what thet must to curb their budget, even for a short-term bases. Go line by line in the budget to see where money is being wasted to either raise taxes or cut uncutable services. Reevaluate as much as possible. I think the federal government should be spending some of the 700 billion to help states/major cities to at least band-aid the crisis until the new Obama administration kicks in. Main street needs the help, more so than the banks because credit is still has an icing over.

Another point to make is that we as American citizens should be able start business’ or provide services that would compensate for what they won’t be providing. Someone needs to stop the stimulus payment that is a another problem we don’t need.

Let’s put it bluntly, you can only “cut services” by so much before you end up hurting a lot of people. The anti-taxers had their heyday, now they are going to have to bite the bullet. What you want from government, you have to expect to pay for it.

Jack, You could make the argument that you could do both. With the shpe this country is in there should be no question that both would be the answer. There a alot of government programs tthat are weighing heavy on the debt and these programs should be wiped cleaned off the debt. I think that Presiden t Elect Obama should go through the budget with a fine tooth comb and get rid of the programs that are not working and rive the ones that are by doing some restructing. I wish him all the luck in the world.

I don’t think most states need to go to either extreme. Having worked in both federal and state government, I can tell you with certainty that there is a lot of wasted money and time. I think state governments should employ common-sense cost-saving measures, cut unneccessary expenditures, and come up with out-of-the box ideas for improving efficiency. It would make much more sense than raising taxes on the last 3 people working or cutting off ambulance services.

Both, raise sales tax only and reduce spending. Also lower state income tax. People will have more money to spend. The fact that they maybe paying an additonal 1-2% in sales tax will seem less painful.

Jack: I hate to raise taxes, but with the unemployment rate going up essential services are needed. I favor raising taxes to help with these bad economic times. My wife who was a state employee for over 35 years knows what happens when there are no services for people. Children fall through the cracks, and their parents have already gone down for the count. State employment services, first time food stamps users, and assistance for heating homes in the winter are programs needed.

John
Alabama

I live in Florida. This year we passed a property tax amendment that was designed to cut taxes related to homeownership. Everyone voted for it did not understanding what the impact would be on their local services included the schools. In my county alone, Broward County, we saw a 188 million cut to our school budget. Imagine the impact of that one! People are so focused on their tax bill that they forget the impact of cutting funding to very vital services. I don’t know what the answer is, but we need to become a little more innovative in our strategies.

Neither, how about holding the state governments accountable. I worked at a state university, and let me tell you the waste I saw, from needless expenditures to dead wood employees.

Instead of monitoring expenses, analyzing where expenses could be reduced, it was a race to spend every dime when you were under budget, whether you needed it or not. Their view is, if you don’t spend it, your budget will be cut.

Well, if you don’t spend it, you don’t need it and your budget should be cut. Let’s have an across the board reduction on all government run services and programs, let’s see if they can rise to the occasion.

You have to see for yourself, you actually wouldn’t believe what goes on in these places. Overwork? How about just work!

Cut taxes. At least 1/3rd of government spending at every level is waste. Hire an impartial consultant to identify what is waste, and cut the jobs and services.

Jack,

Critical thinking with respect to fiscal responsibility first to develop an detailed, long reaching spending plan with priorities must come first. Once that’s done, cut where needed and reallocate where needed. Raise taxes as necessary after that.

Everyone wants the local, state and federal government to do everything for them and to take care of them, but no one seems to want to pay for it.

namaste

Is it just me or does anyone else notice that each time there is a state budget crisis those in office keep their salaries and benefits and the rest of us suffer through taxes and no state help?

if you want to start in saving money start cutting the salaries of governors and legislatures. Most are rich anyway enabling them to be able to afford their own health insurance.

Besides, I read that Sarah Palin’s book deal is $7 million. If that is the case, she doesn’t need that $125,000 a year the citizens of Alaska are giving her.

What would I prefer? Does it matter? They’ve already closed a dozen state parks and historical sites in Illinois within the past four months. I’ve been trying to get a state fishing license for several months… but now, I guess that doesn’t matter either…

Jack, they should take some of the bail out money that belongs to the people in the states and fund the projects the states cannot afford and create some JOBS! The high cost of oil cut our road repairs, we have horrible roads due to the past four years of budget cuts.

By the way, Jack if the GOP thinks they are in trouble now, let them fight the LOANS

there’s no cutting serivces just cut the govt waste in the local govt/s there ios no need to raise taxes cut spending and over paid govt officals

I say raise taxes but not in selected areas. Every resident of the state should have an equal raise on taxes. Governors tend to raise taxes on their pet projects which is biased, all of the state residents should have to pay an equal increase. We do not need less services, too many services are very vital.

Jack raiseing Taxes and continue services is the only thing you can do in todays economy. Saveing jobs and creating jobs maybe the only out of this mess. Cut the waste in useless goverment pork spending.
Raise Taxes.

Raise taxes on booze and beer by $5 per bottle or case like they did on tobacco products and all of the states will have a surplus. States can also build more casinos and change the odds on the lottery to bring in more revenue.

I would prefer that they cut some state services rather than raise taxes. A good start would be to eliminate the numerous speed-traps I have to dodge on my way to work in the morning.

How about cutting wasteful programs first, secondly cut the pay of the state legislators. The taxpayers have far too much burden now as it is without a bunch of overpaid fat cats directing traffic.

I don’t think we have any services to speak of in Texas anyway. I guess it doesn’t matter. If I lived in another state I suppose I would rather have taxes raised to maintain services.

Unfortunately tax an spend has become a catch phrase for the Republican Party over the years even if they didn’t adhere to the principles of smaller government and less spending they have the people believing in their slogan.

The answer just might be tax appropriately and spend appropriately in America and not all around the world like is presently being done.

Workers need to have work and spending on infrastructure in the U.S. will generate jobs which in turn will generate more taxes which in turn will generate more spending and so it goes.

States are not like the Federal government - they can’t print money. Americans deserve and will continue to demand a certain level of state services, and finding new revenue sources (i.e.taxes) will unfortunately be required in these difficult economic times.

Raise taxes. I am for services. People don’t want to pay taxes, but they are the first to complain when services are not adequate. Call me a socialist, but this is my country and I don’t mind spending a few buck to help the other fellow. Let’s pay it forward and backward. It’s a way of tithing.

During hard times, the states should follow the follow the example of thousands of small businesses by working harder, getting innovative, and tightening their belts without cutting services. Raising taxes isn’t an option for business and it shouldn’t be for the states either.

A good way to eliminate a budget deficit is to eliminate the legislature.

Cut services? What services? Government stopped providing “services” to middle class people years ago. So I say cut the so-called services before you raise my taxes. I can tell ya where to start to . . . no more free medical or schooling for illegals for openers!

Actually Jack what I would like is for them to manage their money, and not be in this position. I believe they will both raise taxes and cut services. It is like our education system, paid for in property taxes, sales taxes, the lottery, and yet they are always out of money. Why should I support giving either more money when they can’t manage what they have?

Raise taxes, but with the caveat that the taxes are rescinded when the crisis ends, which we hope is soon. They can’t cut services much more.

Both… Cut wasteful spending AND raise taxes on those above $250K, per President elect Obama’s stated plans….

Now that we have elected Obama it does not matter because in 2 months the light will shine down and America will be debt free and the world will be at peace.

Cut services. You have to protect the state’s bond rating for future borrowing. States cannot borrow money or print it as can the federal government. We are going to need a massive one trillion dollar stimulus package at the federal level funnelled through state job projects to include a new power grid. Tax increases come after the economy has been restored and should be aimed at the wealthy (about 4 or 5 percent increase). Ralph, Yakima, Wa.

Jack why is it always cut service or raise taxes. Why not get rid of the glut of over staffed people sitting around doing nothing. Or in the case of the road dept. where repairs take weeks, and months With labors 3 and 4 just standing around around. How many time have you stoped in the morning an happen to see four or five street dept trucks at one quick market around 9 O’clock on our time.

Our state has joined the band wagon and is crying the blues over the budget and lack of funds. Tennessee relies heavily on sales taxes to support the state. With the recession or economic down turn, whatever you want to call it, people are not spending as much and sales tax revenues are taking a hit. The state is looking at increasing the number of people in the unemployment line. That would be a cut in services. We don’t enjoy high wages here and a raise in taxes is probably out of the question. Many people are barely keeping a roof over their heads, food on the table, and heat for the winter. The Tennesseans are a tough bunch–we will survive! And how about those TItans 10-0.

Cut services. But it’s a Democrat-led government now, so I’ll be burying my money in the backyard to keep it out of their greedy hands.

What the states need to do is make sure that everyone pays their fair share instead of having so many tax shelters that in most cases benifit those with lots of money. The only ones that get hurt when you cut services are the middle class, and poor, everyone else has enough that they don’t feel any pinch at all, but this is America, the ones with the money will always rule..

The answer Jack is oversight. Travelling from Connecticut to New York the other day I noticed that the old “welcome to new york” sign had been replaced with an almost identical one.
This type of spending has no place in today’s economy. Current spending is probably right on the mark - it’s just not being spent on the right stuff.

Whatever state one lives in, state government will do both sooner than later.

If the states eliminate all the cushy jobs in their governments and all the corruption that is part of every state government and they still are short on money, then they should raise the income taxes for all income over $200,000 a year until the deficit is made up. Don’t cut services for those in need just to satisfy rich peoples’ greed.
Brownwood, Texas

Let be realistic, the only way we can move on is by raising taxes. Its going to happen sooner or later. We can’t afford to cut services. Think about the burden it will be to have more unemployed people in this country.

I’d like them to trim some positions at the top of their bureaucracies, cut out bonuses, stop all money earmarked for “conventions,” and stop outsourcing projects to flim-flam consultants. Then with that done, as long as the Federal government is doling out loans, let states borrow from the feds and let them issue state savings bonds.

In Indiana, we don’t have a budget shortfall, just a Governor who won’t spend a dime of our surplus to help get our local county governments the money they need to keep our towns and cities going. Governor Daniels promised to give us a balanced budget in his first term, and he did. What he has failed at, however, is to realize that our tax dollars should go for SOMETHING other than building interest in the bank!!

unequivocally yes raise taxes on anyone making more than $250,000.00 in the great state of massachusetts !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cut services and the pork that our elected officials have handed out to their rich supporters. State government is no different than national government, just on smaller scale in most cases. You still have the officials that use their office and power to become wealthy and take from the taxpayers that put them in office

The correct answer is both. But I think it is about time that states install a saving program. If they just take 3% - 5% of their revenue during good times and put it in a secure holding (not stocks) it could then be used during tough times. If states take this approach then can withstand some hard time without having to cut programs or raise taxes.

Kirven
Rancho Cordova, CA

Neither, they should take after the federal government and just run up as much debt as possible.

NEITHER! Ask for a “bailout” from the federal government. Isn’t that what every other high profile entity in this country is doing? Why place all that burden on the states, is Gm slashing prices, cutting corners, offering incentives to buy their multibillion dollar cars? Nope! Bailout money, right? Why should one state bear so much burden, when we can be like Ford & GM and ask for some of that money too? After all isn’t California doing trying to dip their hand into the till?

Sure you can cut more, but don’t call the fire or police, cause they’ll be on the unemployment line. Isn’t Republican Governance grand, all these folks in both the public and private sectors, who don’t have to go to work anymore.

You forgot one option: Let Uncle Sam, the possessor of infinite credit, print some more money and help out the states.

Ray Kinserlow
Lubbock, Texas

Raise taxes, everything in this country has gone up except taxes so a moderate raise in taxes if it’s for the good of the people i.e. street lights, police, and paramedics then I’m all for it.

Increasing taxes is the only action that will maintain services as they are. Most states services are minimal at best. In addition, raising taxes might increase construction and improvement in our state’s infrastructure, providing jobs adding more taxes to the state’s income roll.

Neither, but if there is no choice, I’d rather they cut services. So many people are unemployed and having a hard time making ends meet, the last thing to do is raise taxes.

Neither of these options seems very desirable but most services are essential to the well being of citizens and can not be neglected. I’d be willing to pay a higher tax to be safe in my home.

raise taxes on the wealthiest.

make budget cuts until we realize we still have to raise taxes. Its the american way. We have gotten to a point in this country were “yes” or “no” is no longer a simple answer.

what about competant fiscal management??? instead of spend spend spend. Just because a government wants something doesn’t mean it needs it the same as the taxpayers! Cut the pork barrel projects and any nonessential spending.

I would rather cut needless spending and useless projects and use the money for necessary items. More money is wasted than is used for legitimate goals.

Raise taxes. People matter. What a concept. Why do people keep forgetting that?

State governments need to stop giving tax exemptions to big businesses for 35 years like they did in my state for an ethynol plant that only brought in 500 jobs. This plant’s tax exemption included not paying its taxes for schools in the area. Its cutting tax deals like that that cause the funding short falls. I would favor a passage of higher taxes on luxury items, such as big screen TVs, and cars costing over $24,000.00, and making it illegal for state to offer such tax break deals as incentives to get businesses to locate in their state. Services woulded not have to be cut if big business would quit trying to dodge its tax obligations in the communities they chose to locate in.

Could they ask for a bailout instead?

Ed Reed
Port Aransas, TX

Raise taxes on the top 25% of wage earners. I’d rather pay more in taxes to make sure kids have good schools, we have good police, and (in turn) my house value goes up.

As much as I hate to say this… I’d rather see them raise taxes. I live in Indiana and there are so many people who need the help of social services. I’d rather pay a little more in taxes than to see more go without. Besides… Our governer likes to outsource things and lease public roads to foreign countries… He’s more likely to cut services, Unless of course he finds more things to sell off…

Create some jobs where I can make my own money and cut services, if I got a job I’m less likely to ask the government for help. I think Obama’s plan is shot to hell all b/c the Bush failures and he’s gonna get the raft of the American people for it.

what i would like is for government whether it be state, local, or federal, to do what we the people are expected to do. live within a budget. you know what the income is now deal with it. cut the big dollar beaurocrats, wasteful spending, pandering with cash and live within your means.

I think it’s going to be a balancing act of cutting some taxes, holding the line on some taxes, and, in some cases, raising some taxes. In the end, states are just going to have to make do like they always do in the “bad” times. If they are fortunate, they put some money away for this “bad” time. However, since most state legislators want to spend it all every year, I’m guessing most states have little savings, if they have any at all.

Jack,

I am a single person who is getting taxed hard…naturally I wouldn’t want my taxes raised any higher…I am also a person that does not qualify for many services offered, but I know they are needed (in most cases)..I would go with cutting services though…there is plenty of wasteful spending that needs to be eliminated…

Who would they tax if everyone is laid off? Cutting services when more people need them is not a good idea either. Give us jobs and they won’t need more taxes or services.

raise revenue

Neither. Coming from a town with apx 20,000 people, we actually need to trim the fat off of our Govt jobs. Here’s some examples, we have about 40 police and 99% of their time is spent on stolen bikes, stopping harmless teenagers in the park after dark and stopping the random drunk driver. If someone is stupid enough to try and rob the camera laden 7-11 once every year or so, they actually have something to do for a day or two - hard to get lost in a town where everyone knows you. There is a person at the fire dept who is paid $32,000 per year plus benefits whose only job is to take calls to reboot the main email server should it go down. Government has taken advantage of our tax $$ for too long! CUT THE FAT!

Neither. Why not cut out some of the ‘pork’ and do away with the ‘perks’ enjoyed by the government. Representing the public should be an honor and that means looking out for the general public instead of No. 1 or any of the lobbyist’s whims. The American population can’t afford to pay more in taxes and they need all the help they can get right now just to keep the wolves at bay.

Raise taxes. DUH.

I would rather they use the brains god gave them to use the money they already get! You know…. A BUDGET!!!

RAISE TAXES. However, when and if any cuts have to be done in a business, etc, it should start at the TOP not the bottom. It is time the big wheel CEO’s and Board Members stopped bleeding their companies and came back down to earth and live like normal human beings. They should remember it is their greed for money and power that have caused 99% of the economic problem in this country. The working class have suffered terribly already. Enough is not enough!

I think the would need to do a little of both. It is simple, as a family when our expenses go up we either need to have more income or cut spending or figure out a way to do a little of both. To say you are going to continue to cut taxes is just stupid. Our country runs on taxes, get over it already.

There are ways to cut spending but cutting services is not usually a good one. Do you cut police services? Fire services? Mass transit? Health care? on and on - are any of those good? I suspect too many people will say you don’t need them.

Cutting programs will only result in more expenses to the taxpayer. History shows that critical social and education programs are among those that get cut, this will only result in more crime and poverty which equals more money spent on prisons and welfare and less money collected in taxes…more deficit. raise taxes!!!!

YES, felons should be expelled. It should automatic, no vote, automatic.
And, they should automatically lose their lucrative pensions and benefits. All that would surely deter criminal behavior. However, you can bet Congress would N-E-V-E-R vote any of this in. Too bad; it would be good to have virtue in our Congress, but not greed.

Neither; I think any and all government agencies have waste. Rather than penalize citizens with additional financial burdens, I think each agency should cutting back & try streamlining their agencies. What infuriates me is the fact that most Americans run their finances like a business; but government agencies N-E-V-E-R do.

Yes, absolutely! What are the people in Alaska thinking? We heard repeatedly during the campaign how Palin had an 80% approval rating. If almost 50% of the people voted for a convicted felon what does they say about the Alaskan peoples’ judgement? What can we deduce from the 80% approval rating by the same people?

When Ron Reagan took office the tax rate on people making more than 3.5 million per year was 71%. Lets role back the Reagan tax cuts and the Fed can give the states more money. Does William McGuire really need 1.78 billion over the last 10 years as Head of United Health Care? Tax him at 71% instead of the 18% he actually paid. This would be a great start.

2 words,

flat tax

I would rather my state cut spending and cut services but, “don’t tax me, tax the man behind the tree.”

Our state is raising fees for utilities and we have bond issues to fix streets, etc. These utilities are now the price of a home.

They have cut Medicare four or five years ago the cost of living for SS increases yearly has been very little in order to give the tax cut to the top 1% which was suppose to expire anyway in 2010.

Start cutting the pay and bonuses for CEO’s is more like it. That is some of what is wrong today. Plus stop sending jobs overseas.

Local Governments should not have to raise taxes or cut services. I was at my local court house today and there were 5 or 6 people in EVERY OFFICE all doing NOTHING. Instead of cutting services, how about the local Governments get rid of some of the excess personnel they have working in the offices. We need our services (Police, Fire, Emergency, ETC.) but we do NOT need all the extra people just sitting around earning a pay check on the public’s bill.