It’s highly unlikely that either candidate, when he’s the President, will affect the capture of bin laden. He’s too convient a bogeyman to be made to go away.

A side comment. McCain said he “Knows how to win wars”. What war did he win that gives him the credentials to make that statement. The only war he participated in, we lost.

neither one of them will catch him. he will die of old age or some sort of disease.

Neither. He won’t be caught. McCain said he’s capture bin Laden. So why hasn’t he shared his grand plan all this time? What could his plan be? send all U.S. troops in and comb each mountain simultaneously? McCain is talking out his…hat. A catchy sound bite

McCain by far, this is a tougher job than community organizing !!!!

Neither man will do a better job of capturing bin Laden. If bin Laden ever gets captured it will be a lot of luck. It was mostly luck that led to the capture of Saddam. Accurate intelligence is of some benefit but more luck, right place…right time, is what will lead to his capture.

Obama!! Everything he has said for the last 2 years are coming true!!! Washington, even Bush is starting to listen to this man!! His talk with Fareed Zakaree on Sunday about foreign affairs was brilliant! His panel today at Purdue University in IN on nuclear, syber and bio teriorism was incrediable!!! If only most of the country would listen to some of these things. These are things that will make us a great country again and SAFE!!!!

Neither. Osama with his beard dyed dressed in floor length garb left Afghanastan / Pakistan long ago He has probably joined Muslims who all look similar probably in Indonesia or East Africa enjoying the fruitless search carried on by the US Military. He makes one trip a year to Marbella Spain dresses in Western Clothing to spend some of his forture on gambling and the opposite sex. He is no dummy!

Jack,
Neither one could catch him. if Bin Laden was catchable, he would have been caught by now. However my money would be on Obama simply because he is considerably younger than John McCain and will undoubtedly live longer to be able to pursue him.

No one will catch him. Bin Laden and Al Queda believe in martyrdom and he will either take his own life or have someone do it for him before he is captured. That being said, who has a better chance to put him in that situation? Obama because he is committed to finishing the job in the Afghanistan/Pakistan region with more than 10,000 troops where Al Queda and Bin Laden are suspected to be operating from. McCain has been hesitant to suggest any increase in troops to Afghanistan because he knows with his open commitment to Iraq he won’t be able to divert our resources where they’re needed.

Well Jack, Obama is younger , appears to be physically fit and can probably get up and down the mountains with out too much effort. And if I can get concurrence from the DNC that if elected Barack will go off into the Hindu Kush for four years, I’d probably vote for him.

Lets see Jack, the bush administration and the republicans have been looking for him for 6 years now and have not found or killed him. With John Mcsame the answer is obvious that Barack Obama would do a better job.Taking a worn link out of a chain and replacing it with the same link will not make the chain stronger.I know you feel the same .I watch you every day and I almost always share your views. KEEP TELLING IT HOW IT REALLY IS JACK!!

I think Senator Obama’s Administration will capture Osama Bin Laden “Period”.

Jack,

Capturing anything is difficult; didn’t you watch Rockie? Now Osama is no chicken, but he’s quick. I just don’t think McCain or Obama have the physical prowace to take down Osama. That’s why I’m in support of sending the good ‘ole chicken hawk, G Dubs, in there to take care of business. Instructions: Do not return until mission is accomplished… for real this time!

-Warren - Detroit, MI

I can’t see either one putting on war-fighter gear and humping into Pakistan to nab the perps. I think that ultimately, it’s going to be the military with a couple more brigades to go around — or maybe one of Osama’s trusted friends who could just use a little extra cash.

Jack: Senator Obama would be the better candidate to get Osama bien Laden, because he is viewed has weak on defense. Senator Obama would go flat out to get Bien Laden, where as McCain would not push to hard to get him. McCain believes his Bio speaks for itself. Obama will work harder to get Bien Laden.

John
Alabama

Jack,
Just take a look at the recent cover of The New Yorker. Your answer is there.

Jack, they’ll be looking for Bin Laden when they find your fossilized bones in the deep strata.

Ray Kinserlow
Lubbock, Texas

MCcain wouldnt even be in the race as his comments yesterday show that hes out of it…he sain he knew how to win wars..tell me,which war did he win, certainly not the Vietnam war. and he agreed to start the Iraq war, and look at the mess it is in !

At this point I’d say an Obama administration would be more likely because McCain would likely try to use the same alliances in Pakistan and there is no way that government would allow incursion into their country. Obama seems more willing to send an attack into Pakistan, as unpopular as that would be with the Pakistanis.

The question defies prediction. And experience will not be the difference. Big factors will be the strategists that are selected and what strategies they employ. McCain does not seem to be a critical thinker to the degree Obama is.

Sen. McCain took his eye off the ball when he co-sponsored the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq. In addition to weakening us militarily and economically, that decision helped Osama get away and proved that Sen Obama’s judgement is better.

Ed Reed
Port Aransas, TX

neither is going to caputure him - the strtegy for Afaghanstan is preety similar.

McSame stands no chance and Obama a slim chance. Meanwhile, we will be waiting with baited breath for Osamas’ next video tape. It should be released for our consumption around mid to late October.

Obama will catch him since Obama is focusing on Afghanistan like we should have. McCain hasn’t said a single word or revealed any plan to catch Bin Laden.

Neither has an advantage, but Obama seems to have a sixth sense when it comes to issues of war and terrorism. He’s been right about everything months . . . even years . . . before others have come around and realized what’s going on.

I don’t know, but after listening to Obama’s visionary foreign policy speech yesterday, I’d rather have him be the one trying.

Obama is the man most likely to at least TRY to capture/kill bin Laden! McCain can promise “dead or alive” BUT McCain has made it clear that he will not step on Pakistan’s sovereignty. As for Pakistan … it musn’t be permitted to harbor terrorists and the U.S. musn’t permit al Qaida to get its deadly hands on nuclear weapons! If Pakistan wishes to harbor terrorists, why should Pakistan be treated differently than Iran!?

A few minutes after the U.S. Air Force obtains the precise coordinates for bin Laden’s location his remains will be at the bottom of a deep crater. He will probably never be “captured” as such. I can’t imagine the next president, whoever it is, wanting an alive bin Laden martyr on their hands. In his case the wanted poster should be changed to read: “Wanted, Dead or Dead”.

It would be a major miracle if either of these two bozos catch Bin Laden!

Tony……………….Ky.

Obama would be better at capturing Osama because he’s smart and would check with those who have good knowledge of his whereabouts and would have a good plan before he went in. Bomb, bomb, bomb Iraq McCain would be too busy fighting wars to find Osama.

Do you really think capturing bin Laden will end terrorism? Too many lives have been lost in our attempt to “capture” this lunatic. It’s time to focus on the home front.

Considering McCain thinks Osama bin Laden is from Iraq, I’d say Obama has a much greater chance of catching him.

Boise, ID

Call me crazy, but when has Obama mentioned capturing bin Ladin? Know one will catch him he’s too much of a coward. Besides when are people gonna wake up and realize that not unlike Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Ladin shouldn’t be our main focus and that protecting this country and our interests abroad from terrorist attack should be?

Obama not only has the advantage on catching Bin Laden, but he also has the advantage on the entire foregin policy front. All John McCain cares about is staying in Iraq for 100 years and going to war with Iran…two things that shouldn’t even be considered at this point in time. I feel that Obama will not only catch Bin Laden, but will also make sure he quickly gives him his due for his part in 9/11

Jack,
Neither Obama or McCain will catch Bin Laden. The way i feel about most of our government is shameful. With Bush and Cheney, and this garbage of a congress we have, i truly fell like we are being run like a 3rd. world government. Obama or McCain, either one doesn’t have the brains to lead us out of this mess that Dumb and Dumber, or Bush and Cheney sold us into. In my opion, these two idiots are also criminals.
Carl in Illinois

John McCain… But the thing is who would be the most lenient with Osama….. Borack Obama. Who else..

It depends on which one really wants him, President Bush pulled our troops away from Bora Bora because he had no intention of killing the son of one of his best friends. Bush, also always has to have an official villain in order to keep his war on terror going. John McCain sounds more like he’s part of Bush’s war machine but who’s to say how deep in the ranks is.

I honestly, truly, seincerely do not see how Senator McCain could do a better job at anything. His lack of understanding regarding the economy, healthcare, the war in Iraq, world geography, Muslim sects, and even viagra, is just plain scary. I am not suggesting that he is too old to be president. I just don’t think he’s up to snuff.

Obama of course. He as been dead right from the start.

Sure Jack,

Either McCain or Obama wil take him out within the first year!
The only reason Bush didn’t press that hard to kill or capture Bin Laden, is that he needed a boogieman!
You can’t justify fighting two wars, stomping on civil right’s, setting up the oil companies for mega profit’s,and huge american contract’s in Iraq going to his buddy’s, without an enemy!
Whithout the war on terror, Bush would have been just another failed president with a few lines in the history book’s. Now he may get a few chapter’s written in blood.

Some of the greatest Countries with what we thought had the greatest technological advances in the world are searching for this man and have found nothing. It is sad and ridiculous that some of the greatest Countries in THE WORLD are after ONE MAN who walks with a cain and who is most likely wearing a foil helmet and they can’t even catch the guy. That’s how you know you’re pathetic. Don’t forget your helmet Jack.

With this question you are assuming Osama is still alive in the first place. How do you even know Osama is still alive? There may very well be nothing to catch at all. Either way Obama is just one of many. When and if he goes someone else will pick up his cause. Always has been that way always will be that way. Osama is out to destroy the entire Western world. His followers are many and growing. Don’t try and kid yourself that all is well when Osama is dead. That is a fools errand.

Sound a little bit scary? Sometimes the truth is scary……

Obama has the advantage here. He knows Bin Laden is in Pakistan or Afghanistan and will seek him out and capture or kill him. McCain, on the other hand, will be looking for him in Czechoslovakia.

Withdrawing our troops from Iraq would indeed mean we lost. So what? It isn’t as if we’ve never lost a war before, and it isn’t as if we cannot learn more from defeat than we could from victory.

Also; we should leave a few troops in Afghanistan, but give up the search on Bin Laden. He’s not in Afghanistan anymore, and plus, he’s nearly deathly ill, he’ll die within a year or two anyways (assuming he hasn’t died already, in some Pakistani cave).

I’d have to say Obama. McCain views a free Bin Laden as a bonus during elections.

Neither, he’ll be caught on the eve of the election. It’s all politics

Obama, he will focus on Binladen and stablish his credibility. GW focused on Sadam because he tried to kill his father (a personal war, not strategic). Obama is more competent, I think he will get other nations to assist because of the change in leadership and a new climate between Washington and the rest of the world.

Obama….he can run much faster than McCain

Jack,
Barack has always said the fight needs to be in Afghanisatn.. To
Barack it was never the “forgotten war”..

If John McCain knows where Bin Laden is then hs should go get him. That would garauntee the election for him.. But heck pander is pander when that is all you’ve got..

Maybe Bin Laden has John McCains Flag Pin because John has seem to forgotten to wear that as well.. !

Straigth-Talk-Express is the “Double-Standard shortbus..”

At 71 years old, I don’t think McCain is up to chasing around the rugged mountains of the Afghan-Pakistani border.

Well Bush & McCain have been looking for him in Iraq for the past 7 years with nothing to show for it other than massive amounts of death and destruction.

Everyone else in the world figures Osama is in the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan so just maybe Bush & McCain aren’t smarter than everyone else in the world.

Fact is neither Bush or McCain wants to capture or kill Bin Laden and Iraq is the proof so Obama is the only logical person to actually try and accomplish this feat but even then it likely borders on the impossible.

Neither one. It doesn’t matter how many troops you put in Afghanistan or even if you conduct illegal raids into Pakistan. These are Muslim countries and very few Americans speak their language. Bin Laden can elude us as long as he wants to and our chances of finding him are about as good as winning the lottery. Which brings up the question. Why are we in Afghanistan? It seem like a fool’s errand to me. Do we actually think we are going to eliminate all terrorists when our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan is creating more each day! Our so-called foreign policy is about as bright as a puzzled donkey.

To clarify, McCain said he knew how to win wars; granted the military experiences he’s had as a troop and as a public servant were not wars. Yes, in a broad perspective America did not win either of these military engagements, but they weren’t wars. I guess my point is, does McCain want Congress to declare war on Iraq? Osama Bin Laden?

I’m confused… is it really important that we catch the devil we know, isn’t it better that we know how Bin Laden will react rather than some [more] radical #2 behind him? Personally, he seems to be a non-issue now; not to mention we still don’t know if he’s still alive. He could just be a sound bite or video recording being manipulated on someone’s PC… you never really know for sure…

You forgot the “none of the above” option.

Jack, The Republicans had their shot at Bin Laden and it was deflected to Saddem Hussein. McCain talks a good talk but he didn”t even graduate in the top forty-nine percent of his class at Annapolis, so how can he say he knows how to win wars? Maybe he flunked that class or slept through it. Let’s give Obama a chance to show us what an intelligent president could do.

My friends, McCain will be looking all over Czechoslovachia…

Jack: I can’t believe that anyone thinks that Bin Laden is still hiding in caves in Afghanistan or Pakistan after all these years. He is living in style in Saudi Arabia or Syria or the like and is helping to direct his term goal of bankrupting us. We most likely will never get him.

Jim
Hoffman Estates, IL

John McCain has been saying for more than a year now that he would follow Osama bin Laden to the Gates of Hell. But apparently he won’t follow him into Pakistan. I trust Obama on this one.

Neither. After all these years isn’t it apparent they’re looking in the wrong place? My guess is that he’s “hiding” in one of those big old palaces in Saudi Arabia….and you know, we’d never look there.

Remember a guy they called Bondar Bush? He was a Saudi and top playmate for G.W. but seemed to vanish after 9/11 along with Osama Bin Laden and the rest of the Saudi elite.

Well Iraq took everyone’s mind off these issues and it’s obvious the Bush cronies, (McCain included) have no intentions of looking any where else lest they should happen to find him. What would the rest of the Saudis and Bin Ladens think of that.

Obviously Obama would at least be looking and if you don’t look you don’t have much of a chance.

Jack,

So now your saying that the president will get the credit for capturing this guy if it happens? What about the troops out there putting there lives on the line, shouldn’t they get some of the credit?

Jack,

It would have to be Obama. He knows that Bin Laden is along the Pakistan/Afghanistan border. McCain seems to think that the only war going on is taking place in Iraq and that Bin Laden is hiding out in Kirkuk or Baghadad.

It’s far too late to think about “capturing” bin Laden. If Bush had concentrated on that instead of his disastorous invasion of Iraq and it’s aftermath, bin Laden would now be a foot note in history.

Neither. The Grim Reaper will collect his soul long before anyone finds him.

Because I believe that the Bush Administration was never serious about capturing Osama bin Laden (911 was used as an excuse to go after Saddam…..not the actual perpetrator bin Laden)…

and I believe the Barack Obama is very intent of capturing/killing him (and therefore will make it a priority). I think that it will be Obama.

McCain is McSame….McBush…..McWar. His focus will be “winning” in Iraq (regardless of how many Troops we lose or how much money we spend).

We missed our chance when Bush started the war in Iraq and changed the focus from retaliating against those who attacked us to bringing democracy to the Middle East. Our only real hope is that he just happens to be in the wrong place at the right time. It will be dumb luck if we do.

Jack,

I believe that Barack Obama would be morely to catch him. McSame will do everything to dance around getting to him. Obama will go in and do what needs to be done to find him. As a former POW I believe that McCain has alot of hostility for alot of people which makes sense, but he can’t just try to take out everyone.

barack.he’s in much better shape for mountain climbing ,and cave spelunking ,in pakistan,than john is .mccain’s lack of geographical and cultural knowledge,as well as current events,may make it difficult for him to know which continent to begin his search.he probably thinks pakistan is just west of norway.

Jack ,

You will catch Bin Laden before two politicians do and I will bet the
ranch on that.

Joe
Tucson, Az

Dear Jack,

Forget it. Neither McCain nor Obama can catch Bin Laden…he’s as elusive as Big Foot and twice as smart. But suppose by some stroke of luck they were able to capture him, then what? Every prominent defense attorney in this great land of ours would be lining up for miles to take Osama’s case. They would argue that you could never find an unbiased jury, and that.the allegations against him are tenuous at best. There’s no DNA, no finger prints, and who in the world would testify against him. He would simply walk and countersue the U.S. government for libel and slander. And he would win, of course. Ah yes, what a great country we live in.

Osama bin Laden is probably dead. And if he’s still alive I don’t think it matters. I would be far more interested in recapturing the White House. It’s been in enemy hands for too long.

Niether one. Guys who make a whole lot less money, guys who live a whole lot less comfortably, guys who enjoy a whole lot less federal protection, guys who have little or no say in the way politics are conducted but have to clean up the messes war-prone egomaniacs tend to make will capture or kill Bin Laden, if he gets capture at all.

In other words, who would be more inclined to invade Saudi Arabia? That is where bin Laden really is.

Getting bin Laden would not solve the problems. There are many others like him. He is just the figurehead presented to the U.S. to keep us distracted.

I’m not sure capturing Osama bin Laden is what’s most important about the war in Afghanistan. The reason that the Taliban even exist is because refugees from the Soviet/Afghan war in the ‘tribal areas’ of Pakistan were educated in madrassas stocked with Wahabi (Saudi) teaching material.

Provide security for the towns who keep getting overran by Taliban and then reconquered by NATO. Abandoning towns to the Taliban and then coming back with force later creates a general mood of distrust and disillusionment.

Funnel in money for the building of new schools in Afghanistan and Pakistan with more traditional NON-Wahabi religious materials and our problems in the area will gradually subside. Of course these schools cannot be seen as agents of America, but it shouldn’t be too hard to dictate curriculum in a roundabout sort of way.

It would be Obama that would be more apt to capture him.

McCain would seach the mountains, cities and countryside all over the world.

Obama would just invite him to dinner.

Hands Down McCain….

Obama-Hands down. I don’t think John Mc Cain has proven himself very good at this war stuff. Does being a POW make you good at catching public enemy #1? I just don’t see the logic…..

Neither. Geraldo Rivera is the only choice for finding binLaden.

Neither, Bin Laden has out 4 presidents and he wont be takin alive…

I don’t care, he’s as irrelevant as Bush and Jessie Jackson. Al Queda has been fractured into hundreds of pieces and with or without OBL they will continue to destroy our economy unless we get a president who understands that we need to worry about our own country and our economy and stop depending on the people who hate us. Even Afghanistan has been so mishandled by shifting focus that it will turn into another Iraq.

I have no doubt Bush has had an eyeball on BinLaden’s location for years and I’ll bet a year’s salary that we’ll see John McBush standing outside BinLaden’s cell between now and the November elections.

October surprise? Shame of the century.

Hmmm.
Well, let’s see jack…
One candidate wants to send troops to the country where Bin Laden is reportedly hiding, the other wanted to stay in iraq for 1,000,000 years or whatever. Even george w. bush could figure out this no-brainer. Um, wait…nevermind.

We should be more concerned with why mccain is all of a sudden jumping on the afghan bandwagon and off the crooked-talk express.

Jack, I think that by the time McCain gets out of Iraq in 100 years, Osama bin Laden will be dead of old age. If that happens then McCain would be the one to catch bin Laden in the “After Life”.

McCain is an idiot! He couldn’t find his way out of a paper bag. He does sound like [my way or the highway]Bush doesn’t he. Capturing and prosecuting Bin Laden will be difficult, no matter who is in charge. Why does everything in this race have to be “I’m better than you are”? I will be so glad when this election is over!

I’m going with Barack Obama on this one, seeing how he’s the only one who says we need to put more pressure on Pakistan. You know, Pakistan, the country that we’re bretty sure Bin Laden is in?

As you probably know, the CIA, Bush Sr., al-Qaeda and the Taliban have worked together in the past, so, who knows who’s playing who, all I know is that thanks to Osama bin Laden, Bush and Norquist were able to carry out their agenda almost to completion. What agenda? Bankrupting America by giving tax giveaways in times of war while emptying our coffers at the same time Big Oil and the military industrial complex (Bush’s cohorts) rake in record profits. Brilliant but a crime against Humanity.

Dear Jack,

Forget it. Neither McCain nor Obama can catch Bin Laden…he’s as elusive as Big Foot and twice as smart. But suppose by some stroke of luck they were able to capture him, then what? Every prominent defense attorney in this great land of ours would be lining up for miles to take Osama’s case. They would argue that you could never find an unbiased jury, and that.the allegations against him are tenuous at best. There’s no DNA, no finger prints, and who in the world would testify against him. He would simply walk and countersue the U.S. government for libel and slander. And he would win, of course. Ah yes, what a wonderful country we live in.

McCain has the experience to do it, but Obama is smarter, so it must be Obama who can capture him. Bin Laden has outsmarted everyone so far, but then again they are republicans!!!!!!!!

Obama of course, war is good for business GOP 101. Osama is one of those people you put to sleep without alot of fan fair. Once the U.S. has it’s world wide cred’s back and Bush nor McCain are in office to do favors for Bush’s Saudi brothers. Someone will give Bin Laden up. Bush’s ties to the Saudis are to close people in the middle east would be stupid to snitch / give him up when the U.S. can not protect them from massive retaliations…

Obama / Powell 08

Jack,

This is a no brainer! If John McCain has admitted to not knowing how to use a computer - you know he can’t work a GPS!

I believe Obama would get the job done, since I don’t believe a Republican wants to capture Bin Laden, it to their advantage to keep him alive, that can make more money and give our money away.

The reality is that capturing bin Laden is a lot like controlling the economy. Presidents can’t directly do much about either situation, regardless of what they claim.

The only thing they can do is shift the allocation of resources and hope for the best. Less resources in Iraq means more potential resources dedicated to Al Qaeda and Bin Laden.

Obama will find him,maybe in one of the 57 states he campaigned in. Or maybe him might know a little about combat from the little green soilders he played with as a boy. Give me a break how can you trust you safety and that of your loved ones, to a 2year senator. Maybe he could invite him over for some tea. McCain, for peace of mind and our safet. McCain\ Clinton 08

Neither, but McCain will complete the bankruption of America trying to and Barack will just talk us all to death about it.

I say it would be any women. Tell them that Bin Laden has their money they are owed for child support & I bet you 10 bucks they would find Bin Laden in a half day. Women can find money any where

who gets Osama is not important,what is ,is that he is captured and brought to justice.But my fear is that he will probably be dead before we get to him.

McCain doesn’t know that Czechoslovakia no longer exists. How could he accomplish anything. He should loose the election in all fifty seven states.

OBAMA!!! … ‘08 and beyond!

Since neither man is on the ground and doing any personal fighting themselves, than I would have to say that neither one of them will capture Bin Laden. Politicians have an extremely ugly habit of taking credit for things that they don’t really do, then shafting the poor foot soldier who takes all the risk and suffers for his country. Besides, Bin Laden is probably walking down the street in Hollywood right this moment with a new face and a cheap fake ID card purchased in Mexico.

Jack,

If elected, Obama will begin looking for Osama in mystery states 51 - 57.

Brad
Tampa

I don’t know if McCain will or will not. What I do know is Obama won’t !He will be too busy invading Pakistan, talking to the troops for hours about “change and hope” while Bin Laden is slipping away to Irak where he will find no resistance since Obama took all the troups out !

Barack Obama will probably have the best chance of capturing Osama bin Ladin if he were President. At least he may be looking in the right country for him. Or then again as elusive as Osama bin Laden has been maybe he is hiding in Czechoslovakia and McCain will get him.

Jack - John McCain of course. Obama only experience I can figure out is being a community organizer. He started running for President as soon as his foot touch the Capital grounds or before. I was a community organizer in my younger days. Do I think that is enough to be President? No way.

Obama would concentrate on capturing bin Laden while McCain would continue Bush’s policy of “spreading democracy.” ‘Nuff said.

Neither one could catch Bin Laden since he is most likely back home in Saudi Arabia, hooked up to a primo dialysis machine, being catered to by the bin Laden family members who were escorted out of the United States by the Bush Administration just days after 9/11 when EVERY OTHER PLANE in the United States air space were grounded! You can’t catch him if you have no intention of finding him!

Maybe McCain, if he only had a brain. But he doesnt. So its Obama. Obama is a thinker and a visionary. He’s already been saying we need to redirect our war efforts to where they should have been all along …Afghanistan. I haven’t heard McCain or even Bush emphasize Afghanistan. But they will.

Obama.

It takes JUDGEMENT and INTELLEGENCE to lead not Military prowess.

Its will be much easer for the head of cow to pass through the hole of a nidle than to catch Bi laden.

Julius
Plano Tx

Jack,
There would really be nothing accomplished in the war or terror or any other war by capturing Bin Laden . A lot of spent effort for no return. Our time could be better spent getting the goods on Bush , Cheney and company

I think Obama has a better chance only because he has been saying we should concentrate on the war in Afghanistan for quite some. The Republicans kept us from fighting the real war on terror by going to Iraq, Mcsame finally realized yesterday we should send more troops to Afghanistan. We need to get out of Iraq and fight the war on terror in Afghanistan. What war did McCain win? I’ve always thought he is delusional and he proved it with that comment. Thanks, Jack I always agree with you and your opinion.

Both have no experience whatsoever about being comander in chief let alone comander. But whoever sounds sensible among them would do good. I think Obama.