CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HEADLINE NEWS



May 8, 2008
Posted: 02:07 PM ET
 Click the play button to see what Jack and our viewers had to say.

Click the play button to see what Jack and our viewers had to say.

FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:

Now that Barack Obama appears on the verge of becoming the Democratic nominee, the buzz about a so-called “dream team” is starting up again.

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos says that there are “intermediaries” discussing the possibility of an Obama-Clinton ticket. And he thinks Clinton “would be under some pressure and would like to accept.” Former congressman Harold Ford also says an Obama-Clinton ticket is something the Democratic Party is going to have to seriously consider in the next few weeks.

There’s even a group called “Vote Both” that’s trying to push for such a ticket. It’s seen as a way to unite the party after an often bitter campaign. A recent poll found a majority of both Clinton and Obama supporters like the idea.

But, not so fast. Obama’s campaign says the Illinois senator is still focusing on the upcoming races and undecided superdelegates, that it’s premature to talk about running mates.

The Clinton campaign says it hasn’t had any discussions with the Obama camp about the ticket, and spokesman Howard Wolfson says he hasn’t heard Clinton express any interest in such a ticket.

Some Democrats aren’t so sure it’s a good idea. One strategist who supports Clinton told Reuters if Obama picks her as his number two, it would counter his message of change. The same person said it might not be “all that useful” to Clinton’s political future to be vice president. Instead she could have “an enormous influence” in the Senate over a long period of time.

Here’s my question to you: Should Barack Obama offer Hillary Clinton the number two spot on the ticket as a way of getting her to quit the race now?

Interested to know which ones made it on air?

Mandy from California writes:
No. He is about “change”. She is about “experience” which is another word

Dan from East Lansing, Michigan writes:
Sen. Obama must select someone who complements the ticket. I think there are a large number of voters who would not support a black candidate, or a female candidate. (My mother is one of them)… It will be easier if the ticket has a governor, for example, who will reflect the change movement, yet has credentials as an effective executive.

Jerry writes:
Jack, Barack should offer her a one-way ticket back to Arkansas, Iowa, Pennsylvania, New York or wherever else she claims to be from. She burned this bridge herself with her pit bull attack. He would only lose my vote by picking her.

Felipe from Lisbon, Portugal writes:
Yes, he can’t win without her! He needs the working class, he needs Latinos, he needs seniors! And most important, he has to consider the millions of people who have voted for Hillary Clinton during the primaries.

Caitlin writes:
Two words: Kathleen Sebelius. She’s the perfect way to fill the constituencies that Obama is missing. She’s from Ohio, is the Gov. of Kansas, is older (59), from a more rural state, is white and a woman. With Sebelius, Obama would win Kansas and Ohio, and capture Clinton’s constituency. All without having to actually having to have the Clintons in the White House.

Joshua from North Carolina writes:
That makes no sense, Jack. Do you not remember her comments on him being elitist or his pastor being offensive? With every problem that Barack has had on the campaign trail, we could expect Clinton to make it worse. Why would anyone want to reward such behavior?

Terrance from Missouri writes:
No, not unless he is planning on employing a full-time food taster.

Filed under: 2008 Election • Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton


A Kraft Naples, FL   May 8th, 2008 2:10 pm ET

NO WAY….he stands for everything she does not…she is the old political style…Washington insiders….he is offering change from that…and that is why he has attracted so many young people…this white granny thinks he will at least improve some of our most pressing economical problems…perhaps Gov Richardson would be a good vice president for him.

Ann Marie in GA   May 8th, 2008 2:11 pm ET

He could offer it to her as long as he has his security beefed up and hires a cupbearer to test his food.

Pat in MIchigan   May 8th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

No way should Hillary be put on the ticket……I’m in favor of Joe Biden or John Edwards, of Bill Richardson even, but to reward Hillary for the way her and Bill “Pimp Daddy” Cinton have behaved the last several months would be a travesty…….I think she would look better on McCain’s ticket she seems to be leaning that way more and more

Rayshaun, Amityville N.Y   May 8th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

Jack, we want to make Obama’s fight against Mccain easier for him, not harder! That move would be a gift to the Republicans in the fall. And besides, it would be a cold day in hell before a Clinton would take any #2 spot you know that.

JD - NH   May 8th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

No. If she accepted he would have to hire a food taster.

proud army and navy mom from TN   May 8th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

jack,
hell no!
after those race-baiting comments that she just spewed, old girl better hope she will be re-elected in the senate. how very presidential of her. it just down right un-patriotic

Ron Kepics   May 8th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Hi Jack:

No, I think Hillary’s ego would be a problem.

Ron K. San Diego

Jenny   May 8th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

Jack,

Hillary does not want to be second chair again. She spent 8 years in that position. If for some inexplicable reason Obama takes leave of his senses and does offer the spot to her, I hope that he will ask for that flack jacket she wore in Bosnia. Two words, Vincw Foster.

sarah, Indiana   May 8th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

since he is unqualified and unelectable in the general, heres an idea, the supers who want the dems to win can vote for Hillary and give Obama the consolation prize as veep.

Anthony Smith   May 8th, 2008 2:14 pm ET

Absolutely! He will regret it if he doesn’t! The only possible replacement would be Edwards. He has an upside and as a ticket, they would dominate the south and he would bring some religious folk with him. With Hillary, he gets the backing and experience he is lacking. It is a no-brainer to pick one of them!

Wildwood Crest, NJ

gCs Gonzales LA   May 8th, 2008 2:14 pm ET

No!

Michelle, Baltimore   May 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

No I don’t think that he should offer it to her because she just might accept it. Their visions for the country are so parellel that it would contradict his message of change. You can’t run as a change candidate and then offer the VP spot to the establishment.

I do however, think that he should consider choosing a female running mate. In that scenario Americans can still have a “dream ticket”. We could have the first Black president and the first female VP in history. Once he’s done with his administration his VP could run for president and win.

Jon from Austin, TX   May 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Even though both candidates have similar stances on the issues, choosing Clinton to run on the Obama ticket would defeat everything Obama stands for. Hillary represents the same ‘ol politics as usual that has caused Washington D.C. to reach the stalemate its in. If Obama expects to help change this country he will need to pick someone with similar uplifting values.

Jenny   May 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Jack,

Hillary does not want to be second chair again. She spent 8 years in that position. If for some inexplicable reason Obama takes leave of his senses and does offer the spot to her, I hope that he will ask for that flack jacket she wore in Bosnia. Two words, Vincw Foster.
jenny Rome GA

Les from Coral Springs, Florida   May 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

Jack,

Obama would be foolish to let the Clintons in the “hen house”, OMG!

I strongly believe that the Clintons want to ruin Obama’s big chance so Hill can run in 2012.

oh, and BTW, I just finished your book and enjoyed it immensely..

Les

Ruthie, GA   May 8th, 2008 2:15 pm ET

HE?? NO! He can win without her. Hillary and Bill are joined at the hips. With her Type A personality, she will over step her boundaries and Bill will never go away. She has too much baggage.

ajks   May 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Absolutely not!!! The democratic party and the new President Obama would have to spend the whole four years worrying about where Bill would be and what he would be saying and doing. The new President needs a partner without all of the strings attached–someone who would appeal to the broad spectrum of Democrats.

Annie, Atlanta   May 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Yesterday, I thought it probably would be a politically wise move. Today, however, he may have to take a pass. Is she really playing the race card to try to stay in by accusing him of losing ground with white voters? When I think she can’t sink any further, there she goes.

Yve Fort Washington, MD   May 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

HELL to the NO!

Why should he have to share his historic moment with her?

In my opinion Hillary is continuing this race to pay down her campaign debts. I’m sure Obama can float her $11M+ if she agrees to get out now.

Angela   May 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

Jack - I may be wrong, but if you consider the electoral math - Clinton has WON the big states that Democrats need to carry in the General. She is ahead in electoral college votes, is she not???? That does factor in to the electability arguement.

Maybe she should offer Obama the VP spot. Not all democrats agree with you - many DON’T want her to quit. Besides, I am worried about you - what will you do with your day if she drops out?

Terry in Hanover County, VA   May 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

No way. If Hillary were the VP, President would constantly be told how to do things not only from her but also from Bill. Better to cut the cord now. He doesn’t need her and New York does. Besides, after June 3rd, it’s over.

John from CA   May 8th, 2008 2:16 pm ET

It would seem out of character for him to make such an important decision purely for political gain. If that were the case I would want to be convinced that he wasn’t just pandering to her loyalists.

Mark in Minnesota   May 8th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Absolutely not!!!! Hillary has shown herself to be too divisive. She loves being the center of attention, and who knows what shenanigans she (and hubby Bill) would pull to get into the spot-light. Hillary has proven that she cannot be trusted; as she has shown that, to her, the truth is defined as whatever may be politically/personally expedient at any given moment. Barrack has shown that he has the resilience to weather rough times; he is honest, and kept his integrity above reproach; and will tell you truth — no matter how unpallatable it may be. An Obama/Hillary ticket would be the ultimate contadiction of terms.

Otis Redmon   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Yeah, he should. I believe it’s the only way to completely unite the party. Enough already.

Terry in Hanover County, VA   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

No way. If Hillary were the VP, President Obama would constantly be told how to do things not only from her but also from Bill. Better to cut the cord now. He doesn’t need her and New York does. Besides, after June 3rd, it’s over.

Karen, Nashville Tn   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Get her to quit? Hillary Clinton has a vision of herself that she will never relinquish, and it’s not as VP of the United States. She is so deluded it’s frightening.

Shabazz, Houston   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

No. The most he should offer her is cab fare home to NYC. Her race-baiting (by referring to herself as the candidate most appealing to white americans) is so shameful, she should never have another opportunity to live in the White House. Furthermore, if she can’t keep her campaign out of debt, what makes her think she should have a crack at the nation’s finances?

Dave from Arlington, MA   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

If Obama offers Clinton the VP spot it should be on his terms. I have pretty negative feelings towards Hillary Clinton after seeing her conduct over the last few primaries, but I believe Obama should and will do whatever he thinks is best. I do not believe that should be the result of political bargaining, but rather the result of conventional wisdom.

lou from Iowa   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

No, his campaign was about turning the page of old politics and Clinton is the centerfold for that book. Once her base of women understand McCain’s position on selecting two supreme court justices to over rule women’s choice laws, they’ll come over. He could pick a running mate like Joe Biden to pull in those middle age men he needs. Clinton isn’t the only game in town.

Marie   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Terrible. He’d inherit all of her negatives. I’m more concerned that she’ll ask Obama to pay off her campaign’s debts in order to secure her endorsement. I doubt she wants to lose the $11 million she’s pumped into her campaign.

proud army and navy mom from TN   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

vote/both and hillaryclinton.org is one in the same. it’s hillary behind the curtain trying to get Sen Obama to ask her to run with him. she is so deceitful and dishonest, it takes my breath away.

Carol c.   May 8th, 2008 2:18 pm ET

Absolutely not! NO matter which candidate we are supporting, should that candidate not win, we know what the alternative is and this country cannot survive another term of BUSH politics.

We will do what all families do–we will grumble a little and pull up our chins if we are on the losing team and hold our head high because we will win the White House back for the American people!

Carol
Knoxville, TN

Judie   May 8th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Obama should not under any circumstances offer the number two spot on the ticket to Hillary. I think if he offered her the position he would lose a lot of his well earned voters. Her ticket has been canceled and all that is left is her rapidly depleting personal bank account and her memories of being the first failed woman to run for the White House. She should go into seclusion and get some well deserved rest and therapy. She has nothing positive to provide to Obama’s campaign and would be a painful thorn in his side as Vice President.

Judie
St. Augustine, Fl

Yolanda   May 8th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Absolutely not! He should offer the VP spot to Colin Powell.

James in Cape Coral, FL   May 8th, 2008 2:19 pm ET

Jack,
No! There’s no reason for Obama to offer Clinton the #2 spot. He’s winning, in fact he’s won and she can continue to lose if she want’s because as long as he’s winning she really isn’t in the way. Hillary has been caught in more than one lie and always brushes it off as if it doesn’t matter. I see honesty and integrety when I look at Obama and that shouldn’t be tainted by the likes of Clinton. I would trust the Obama administration more than ever if Hillary was a distant memory.

Kim   May 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

A loud and resounding NO! She and Bill will only be a distraction to Obama’s presidency.

Rochester, NY

NH-Independent   May 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Jack, I don’t see Hillary as the change that Obama is proposing. Obama needs VP that believes in the same change that he does. Obama needs a VP who can continue this movement in 8 years. Hillary is the same old politics and she has been acting like more and more like a republican. I think she has a better chance of being offered the VP spot by McCain.

Curtis   May 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Yes he should. Then MAYBE she would stop acting like she is still in the race.

Curtis
Roanoke Rapids, NC

JUTSON OERI   May 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Offering Hillary clinton the VP spot will negate the whole meaning of change and a clean break from the past. besides, this might entail coopting her incompetent campaign staff on his which in the outset is disastrous. Obama will be better served by a candidate undogged by division and double talk. At the end of the day she will be more of a liability than an asset. Remember what Reagan did in 1980 by opting to go with George Bush rather than Gerald Ford?

Philip Smith   May 8th, 2008 2:20 pm ET

Like everything else in life there’s good and bad.

Good: We get this eternal “process” over with and start to focus on the general election.

Bad: We still have Hillary.

Philip from South Africa
USA citizen planning to vote for Obama in November (with or without Hillary)

Valmontina   May 8th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Should Obama and Clinton double up? definately not!!I am A Brit currently residing in Portugal…Idoubt they could ever heal the rift which is obvious to all and sundry. And keep Al Gore out of it…I have too much respect for him to treat himself as a stalking horse. I thought politics were dirty in the UK.. you guys beat the rest!! there should be financial constraints on each candidates spending power, then you have a level playing field…

IFEANYI AZUBIKE Houston, Texas   May 8th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

NO, NO, NO. It will be political suicide for Obama to offer the second spot to someone who needs the number one spot as badly as Hillary does. The number two position should be reserved for someone who has by their predisposition earned that spot and from whom the president can expect unalloyed loyalty. Hillary does not fit that picture. Al Gore did, Dick cheney did, and theirs is the type of temperament that will ensure a successful tenure when and if Obama should be elected, not someone who will be waiting to pounce or will most likely challenge the next nominations. Hillary has exhibited and continues to exhibit traits that call for some caution. Above all, Obama has earned the right to freely nominate his running mate and should not be bound to people who are still working to trump his chances against McCain, or people who are making the arguement that he is unelectable or not ready to be president on day one.

Okla, .Senior   May 8th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

No, but maybe Senator Clinton could offer Senator Obama a VP spot.

Folks. the race ani’t over yet. Stop complaining, Obama supporters.

mark   May 8th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

Probably so. It heals the major rift in the party, that Clinton herself created. But Richardson would probably have been an equally good choice for the latino vote.

Clinton will bring the voting block of women who want a woman if office. I don’t believe for a second the joe 6 pack will follow Clinton over McCain. No matter how much that may be happening now in the primaries, it ain’t gonna happen in November if she is the nominee for president. Sorry HIllary.

Rosalynd Florida   May 8th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

No, Absolutely not! Clinton is devisive and her racially tinged comments yesterday about her white blue collar voters that will not support Obama (implicaations that is because of his race ) just adds to the tone her husband Bill started after South Carolina’s primary. This country needs to heal and come together to repair the 8 years Bush has spent tearing it down. There is no place in the next Administration for the Clintons mean spirited and polarizing politics. The Clinton era is done and it is of their own doing. Good riddens!

Jan From Boca Raton, Fl   May 8th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

You may please alot of people that way, but for myself I will not vote

for Obama if he is the Presidental canidate, I am going to vote for McCain, and I have voted democratic for over 40 years. I will not vote
for someone I do not believe in.

Mike S., New Orleans, Louisiana   May 8th, 2008 2:22 pm ET

Obama should offer Hillary the number two spot as a symbolic gesture, but only on the condition that she refuses it. And if she
did accept it, if I were Obama, I would keep a parakeet in every room to signal monoxide poisoning, and test all my food and drink on animals before eating or drinking.

lee Marietta   May 8th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

No, that is not a good reason enough. He needs to offer it to her only if he strongly feels that they can work together to bring about the change our country so desperately needs.

Connie   May 8th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Jack, I believe that would be a big mistake. Obama is tomorrow, Hillary is yesterday.As far as the pundits and Hillary saying that white woman voters for her , would not vote for Obama is bull. Of course there were some who voted for her because she is a women and there were those who voted for him because he is black, but they will come together in Nov.
As a white women making less than fifty thousand a year and did not complete college , did she call me stupid ? Did she infer that I am not smart enough to see the difference between Obama and McBush? Maybe if she plays her cards right McBush will offer her the V.P. spot.

Voted for Obama and proud of it. Connie from IN.

CS   May 8th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Senator Clinton has a lifetime of political prowess to contribute to the well-being of the American people, making her a VP will be the next best thing for the American people. A Clinton Vice Presidency will only propagate an Obama administration at the least.

That said, Senator Clinton remains undefeated and if her battle for the White House has shown us anything, then we should all keep in mind how she won the big, populous states and how strong-willed she is. I will only vote for Obama if there is the Clinton Vice Presidency, or I will not vote at all.

Clinton ‘08

Roger Cyr   May 8th, 2008 2:24 pm ET

At a press conference in West Virginia this afternoon Hillary Clinton said she “should be the the winning candidate because she is gaining more support among working , hard working Americans, white Americans. ” It is obvious that the black vote is a problem. That is the implication from her comments. I am curious to know if there are a lot of hard working black and brown blue collar/working class Americans that vote for the Democrats. After those comments it is ridiculous to suggest Clinton be part of the Obama team. She is a liability.

Rich   May 8th, 2008 2:25 pm ET

It’s gotten, really too, ugly out there.

Susan   May 8th, 2008 2:29 pm ET

Doesn’t matter if he does it now or later, but he’s going to have to do it eventually if he wants to win.

Susan
Ohio

Terry, Chandler AZ   May 8th, 2008 2:30 pm ET

Jack,
Barak should not offer Hillary the VP spot as a way of getting her to drop out, he should do it to produce a winning ticket.

Roger, AR   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

I don’t think he should offer the V.P. to Hillary. If he did it would help him be the next president because that would be the only way a lot of Hillary supporters would vote for him.

june   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

No he shouldn’t. I couldn’t possibly support Hilary Clinton for vice president. It would seem that her compulsion for winning is impair-
ing her judgement. She seems to be unable to recognize that the light she is seeing at the end of her tunnel is a train. It would frighten me to sense that lack of discernment in someone who might have to take over the presidency.

Yetunde Babajide   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Jack
Hell no,she is very very vindictive,I dont trust her, she would distract Obama from doing what God had sent hm to do.Again, you guys always make Clinton believe that they are so important to this election.but forgetting that presidential position is a public position for everyone.who are they anyway?tell Hilly-Billy its time to go ,Live and Let Live.

Phillip Shakespeare   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

If Obama offered VP to HRC it would be cynical almost to the point of suicidal in terms of what he has said he stands for.
Cannot even see this being possible. I’d reconsider my vote going to McCain if it happened.

Phillip Shakespeare

Frank, Sarasota   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Jack, big mistake. If Senator Obama picks Hillary for vice President he
would surely have to sleep with toothpicks in his eyes to keep them
propped open during the night to make sure that Hillary “the monster”
Clinton doesn’t pay him a visit around 3 a.m. from some secret
passage way in the white house that Senator Obama doesn’t know about yet.

Ben   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Well, that sounds like a great idea, since Hillary is determine to pull down the democratic party unless she gets what she want;She wouldn’t stop unless they offer her some type of consolation price.

john, nc   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Since Obama probably won’t win the general election, it would weaken her political standing as having accepted a VP spot. Also, Obama would feel uncomfortable having someone smarter than he under him.

ccooper   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

He shoud be vise president. The DNC should not be building up as
winning the nomination as President. He wan’t get to be either if he
don’t take second place as vice president. There ae millions that say
they will not vote for him. You just mark my word he will not be president. Hillary will be president before he will. The media and blacks have made this the worst racist thing that i have ever see.

Camille   May 8th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Obama needs to pick someone like John Edwards. A southern white gentleman who cares about the issues that he does. Not a two faced northerner who would work behind the scenes to impeach him so she can be president…..!

Brian in Puyallup, WA   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

The ‘Dream Ticket’ is nothing more then a hypothetical bumper sticker. Hillary has a bright future ahead of her in the Senate and Obama’s change message may come under scrutiny by some of his supporters if she was chosen. Personally it would be nice to see these two come together, but they can unite the party if Hillary pushes hard for Obama to become president as opposed to the Clinton Machine pulling another John Kerry move by not going all out for the nominee. If the Clinton’s decided to go the 2004 route again, it may damage their brand irrevocably.

Ted, Beaverton, OR   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Under no circumstances. For the women’s vote, ANY woman would do that if based simply on the reason of voting for a woman because she’s a woman. Many women feel that way. Remember, Hillary carries far too much special interest/lobbyist baggage, and I am certain that Senator Obama wants to be just as far from Bill as he can get. This country needs to shed as much of that kind of old style politicking as we can. Obama is dedicated to that princial, Hillary sees it exactly opposite.

Gord   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

No. I personally would prefer Clinton over Obama, but both of the candidates have very high negatives that will weaken their chances. Besides, if Clinton is on the ticket, the Obama camp will just blame her for losing the election in November. If Obama wins the nomination, he should choose someone else who may attract the “lunchbucket democrat” vote that seems quite averse to his candidacy. Maybe John Edwards. I can’t imagine Hillary would want to be VP.

koomson ferguson   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

No way, it will be a shame for clinton to accept that position.Bcos she was the one offering that post to Obama, and now she is going to bent back and accept that position, that will be a shame and a suprise.

Rehards,
koomson ,

CANADA.

roberto   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

No, Hillary Clinton represents the same old way of doing things in Washington that Barack Obama wants to change.

Linda. Boston, MA   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Absolutely not. While they share many of the same views with respect to policy, her brand of politics - her set of values (such as they are) - go against everything he stands for. She is combative, dishonest, and divisive. She will make his goal of reaching across the isle and working with Republicans and very difficult one to achieve. Nor is she someone we want as an ambassador to other nations; she’s already pissed off Canada, insulted Putin, and threatened to “obliterate” an entire nation. That is NOT the Obama way.

Vic, Toledo, Ohio   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

ABSOLUTELY NOT…That would cost him more votes than it would gain. I have to ask if this keeps coming up because she is a woman? Does America just hate seeing a woman have to walk away? Has any other presidential nominees been pressured to take the loser onto thier ticket before?

Bud Curtis   May 8th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

Since Obama is just like any other politician, he will probably offer it to her. I hope she does not accept it because I do not want her to be on a losing ticket.

She will do just fine, thank you, without getting the nomination. And maybe, if the Democratic party is lucky, she will agree to run next time.

Bud Curtis
Miami, OK

George S., New York   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

He may have no choice if he wants to win in November.

Cesar   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Obama will lose without her period.

Dave in Astoria   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

NO!… She should be offered the chairmanship of the World Bank or Secretary of Defense. Maybe Ambassador to Iran or even The Statue of Liberty maintenance contract. She wants money and/or power and her ego won’t allow for a graceful retreat so I think the President has to be creative and keep her busy.

Joel King   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Hillary is dead on the national political scene now. She was to selfish to help the party and to stupid to help her future she will never be president or vice president no matter what the year or what the circumstances.

David - South Carolina   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Not just no, but hell no! The Clinton machine is resorting to the only thing that has worked so far, the race card. This woman is so hell-bent on being president that she’s willing to throw the entire party in the ditch to do so, and the country too. Their subliminal message since S.C. has been, “Remember, HE’S BLACK!” Unfortunately the Ameican electorate is not sophisticated enough to know the difference. The U.S. is never going to see change until we stop letting people tell us what to think. If she cared about the Democratic Party, even if she just has to stay in the race, the rhetoric, starting Wednesday morning, should have been geared toward recociliation. She is depending on a racial divide, and depending on the poor uneducated , blue collar, white folk to do the dirty work for her. I know, I are one. WAKE UP PEOPLE, and smell the B.S.!!!

Eileen at Lagnua Beach CA   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

No. And he darn well better not use any of my hard-earned contributions to his campaign to retire her “loans” to bankrupt campaign.. Let the Clintons learn the hard way that their doubling down gamble for more power and the White House lost some of their wealth. They thought it was in investment in their future profits.
She is morally bankrupt. Her “vote whte” message is derisive.
Barack is better than that and deserves a VP who supports him and shares OUR values.

Dylan   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Jack,

Obama should pay off Senator Clinton’s campaign debt in full - under the stipulation that she return to the Senate and stay completely away from the Executive Branch. Obama’s best chances lie with a moderate Democrat with fewer negatives than positives; Evan Bayh of Indiana and Virginia’s Jim Webb come to mind.

Dylan
Indiana

CL Chasing Hawk   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Dear Jack:
I believe “Obama Girl” would garner more votes than ‘middle of the road’ former 1st Lady Hillary.
Thanks but no thanks, CL.

Cyndi from Lancaster, Pa   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Absolutely NOT !!!!!

Obama has earned the right to choose who will fill that spot and I would make bets that she doesn’t even make his list of possibilities.

James, Los Angeles   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

No! No! No! No! He would be forever looking over his sholders,
One thing he should have learned thoughout this process is
how can you trust the Clinton’s.

Terry from North Carolina   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Jack
Are you kidding with this question, I hope Barack Obama doesnt see this question he will need oxygen. Lets hope that Hillary will see that the end has come, and her and Bill take a long vacation. Let her concentrate on something else, how about the Governor of New York ?

Elisa   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Jack,

The president of the USA is “one person”; if Hillary was vice-president - we might have a co-president before re-election in 2012.

BW CINCINNATI   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

I am very weary of the Clinton bashers. There is NO evidence that they are responsible for anything but 8 years of relative peace, and prosperity.
Hilary Clinton is a great choice for VP, and she still has about 50% of the Democratic electorate behind her.
The Obama campaign should get over it’s disdain for the Clintons, and realize that their brains, and tenacity, and voting base might be useful to a person who technically does not yet have 2025 delegates.

Mike Oradell, NJ   May 8th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Jack

Sen Obama should offer you his gratitude for your undying support. You have done as much as anyone to help him get to where he is now.

Kristen St Louis, MO   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

No, no, no, no, no. The opposite of yes. Obama stands for principles…Hillary stands for nothing but Hillary.

CP   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

In a perfect world, it would be a dream ticket, but because its not, then HELL NO!!!!! Hillary is damaged goods and comes with way too much baggage which baffles me has to why she feels she is more electable than Barack. She may think she is fully vetted but the truth is she is not. She and her supporters may feels that all her and Bill’s scandals are old news, but its not to all the new young voters that have come out in waves this election.

Karen in Maryland   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Jack Hillary feels such an entitlement to this nomination that she will not settle for the VP spot. She claims that if this nomination process ran according to the Republican rules she would already be the nominee. Inspite of using Republicanlike tactics and aligning herself with FOX News she is still losing. She should not be allowed to hold the Democratic party hostage. Obama is beating her fairly according to the rules of their party that she claims to love so much. But she wants things changed for her favor. She has cried she complained, and her hubby claimed that they are beating up on a girl. We have seen her tantrums in the ads and nasty attitude while Obama has maintained his same position and keep moving forward

Dina - Philadelphia, PA   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Hi Jack,

All I have to say about this question is H_LL NO! I know that Hillary and Barack are battling for the nomination, but I truly believe that Hillary has forgotten that she is in the same Democratic Party as her opposition. If she ended up being the nominee, I would get drunk and then go to the polls and vote for her. Why, because I want to barley remember that she would be the next president, but for the small part of what I would remember is that I didn’t vote for John McCain!

Lisa W. Midland, MI   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Before today I would have considered it an interesting possibility. However, after her comments about hard working whites - ones who did not go to college, being the votes she after… I am furious! We are one nation with a very multi-culturally rich and diverse country. I want a President and Vice President that will represent us all. So, to answer your question, no. Hillary just lost any respect I had for her.

a white woman from middle America!

Bobe Jua, Nashville   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

No. She is too ambitious and it can be pretty uncomfortable if someone like her is going to be the one waiting to take over just in case… If I were her I’ll seek the leadership of the Senate. That way, she will have more of the control she so desperately wants.

Len   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

No, most of the American people don’t trust her and neither should he. Besides, where’s “the change” in doing that?

simple yes   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Jack:
The party is half and half… The way I see it she got the eye on the VP spot and she has earn the backing of millions of Americans. She can help Obama get the Whitehouse if he ever gets the nomination. The problem we have is that Obama backers in general have vomited so much hate for a Woman that has worked so hard for Americans and she is loved by many of us. I for one as a democrat all my life and pains me horribly to say I will not back Obama without Hillary on the ticket. NO WAY… NO HOW. I am mixed and part African descendant like Barrack and I am not a racist.

Brenda from Indiana   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

While Hillary appeals to some people in America, there are a lot of people who she does not appeal to and a lot of those are independents and Republicans. Barack has run this race on his own terms, always stepping up on the side of truth and change. To do this would be pandering to a group of folks just to get their vote. Moreover, a lot of those people would not vote for Barack anyway because of their belief system. Let’s let Barack make his own choice.

Steve from California   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Hilliary Clinton would never give up her Senate seat to be Vice-President. Although it’ll be difficult to deafeat an incumbent she’ll wait the four years and run against President McCain.

John   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

If he does, he’ll have to find a desk for Hillary’s “VP” (aka Bill) as well.

Craig Brazier   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

Mr. Obama should NOT offer the vice-presidency to Mrs. Clinton.

Though Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton agree on many of the substantive issues, I feel anything BUT the full glare of the spotlight for the Clintons would not be enough for them. This can only detract from an Obama For President campaign, let alone an Obama presidency.

I think the tone of Mr. Edward’s campaign, and his fresh thought on so many of the issues affecting Americans is much more in keeping with Mr. Obama’s vision.

Obama & Edwards ‘08.

David - New York   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

No, he should not. He shouldn’t be as gracious as she was and offer the number two spot. Like Rev. Wright, she’s antithetical to his campaign and the change from “Washington” we long for. If they ran together, she would have to recant every negative comment she has made about him; and this would make her appear even more hypocritical — if that’s even possible. The media will quote every comment she’s ever made and run every video clip — i.e. “shame on you Obama”. Off course, she will say she misspoke or has been taken out of context. But, we won’t believe her because 60% of us don’t trust her. She can find solace in knowing that she will convince the same dim-witts who bought her gas tax idea.

Michelle   May 8th, 2008 3:12 pm ET

No. I would not vote for any ticket with Hillary on it. The irony is, I began this campaign squarely in her corner. She was who I thought the Democratic nominee should be. However, over time, I could not ignore her lies. The latest that she raised 10 million dollars after her PA win..when she herself donated that money to the campaign. That’s another baldface lie and I know we’ve had liars as President’s before but I will not knowingly vote for her. No thank you. I would never vote for a ticket with Ms. Clinton on it at this point but had you asked me a year ago I would have been one of her biggest supporters. Her negative campaign, the lies, the machinations, have really opened my eyes to who she is. And more than anything she’s hellbent on destroying the Democratic Party if she does not get the nomination and no one person is bigger than the party and it’s time SOMEONE stood up to the Clinton machine and imparted that little piece of information to them. They don’t seem to have gotten the memo.

Michael, Canada   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

How can Barack have Hillary as his VP when she has made it abundantly clear that Barack is unelectable, his health care plan won’t cover all Americans, he is losing the white vote, that he is not fully vetted and that he lacks experience?

The other key issue for Barack in considering Hillary as VP is: how does Barack keep Bill away from the White House?

Sean   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

As an ardent Obama supporter, I am strongly opposed to this idea. Sen. Clinton has proven repeatedly in this election that she cares more about winning than serving the needs of the people. Also, to me, the whole reason Obama is a more electable candidate than Clinton is that even though some Republicans aren’t thrilled with McCain, they would probably vote for him to keep the Clintons from having a third term in office. Because let’s face it, the way Bill has been acting during this campaign makes it pretty clear that it would be a co-presidency if Hillary won. Obama would be foolish to take on that kind of baggage, and Clinton would do better by staying in the Senate. I’d love Bill Richardson as a VP personally.

John Q   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

i am beginning to wonder what Clinton realy wants it appears that the majority of voters have spoken and prefer Obama . why is she disregarding the public she is claiming to care about. unless she is trying to help undermine Obama’s chance against McCain. if she is so determined to help the people why not take a vice Pres. position to Obama. My neighbors and I used to like her , but this has convinced us its more abouot her Ego than making things better for the American people.

Gen   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

No! No! No!

An old white bitter soccer mom from suburban area.

OBAMA 08

Fred (Ft Worth)   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

No he needs to choose Lou Dobbs.

danny in atlanta   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Hell no, the way she has behaved the most he should do for her is buy her another pants suit. It is time for this country to rid itself of the Bush Clinton dynasty and bring new blood and thinking to America. Obama is a fresh breath of air. If she were VP Obama would have to create a new cabinet position for someone to watch Bill.

Kevin in Atlanta   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

NO!

FG   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

We are heading to a new era - not business as usual.
No definitely not!

shirley   May 8th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

No, Hillary lacks the good judgement and personal integrity to be President so she is not Vice Presidential material either.

Amy R.   May 8th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

Jack, are you kidding me? Let’s just say this, Obama is about uniting the nation. Based on Hillary’s divisive comments today about Obama and white voters, Hillary only seems about dividing both the democratic party and the entire nation. A joint ticket for Change can’t represent the negativity that Hillary is selling.

deec   May 8th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

Well If he does decide to do that I think they could win, But I think he should ask Wesley Clark , Hillary supporter’s are funny She Lost already Except it and lets Move on

Ray, Minneapolis MN   May 8th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

Absolutely! How else are you going to heal the party after such a costly and emotionally charged campaign! Both have their passionate supporters and the only real solution to win the White House is to have both great minds on the ‘Dream Ticket.’ I’m a staunch Hillary supporter, I’m 29 years old, and in the Obama demographic. I really enjoyed his speeches, but really, the Republicans are going to eat him alive! You can’t live the rock star live forever. One October day in the near future the buzz wil die out, and he will have to prove he has what it takes. With Hillary on the ticket, he can’t loose.

cj-delhi ny   May 8th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

Absolutely not!! He shouldn’t pay her debt in exchange for her to quit either. She just needs to go away.

Melanie   May 8th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

Absolutely NOT!!! Obama should give Senator Clinton enough room to come to peace with the fact that she has a legacy that she can be proud of: She has been the First Lady of Arkansas twice, she has been the First Lady of the United States for 2 consecutive terms. She has been the only Former First Lady to make elected History by becoming Senator. She has paved the way and opened doors for more female governors and for those First Wives who would like to run for an elected office. For America’s sake, give her space to let it sink in and that is all that she should be given.

Susan   May 8th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

Absolutely not! Talk about putting a fox in the chickenhouse. The very essence of Hillary Clinton goes against everything Barack Obama stands for. People equate Hillary Clinton with terms such as arrogant, obsessed with power, corrupt, cold, calculating, old school politics, etc. Obama’s entire campaign is premised on changing the image of Washington politics. No way that will happen if Hillary Clinton is his VP or even in his Administration. He needs to pick a running mate from one of the large swing states who can help him carry that State. The Democrat will naturally win New York as well as Illinois.

Albert   May 8th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

Only he can decide. His choice needs to reflect his vision of leadership for the nation. Anything else would be the same kind of pandering the Clinton-McCain gas tax holiday is.

58 white old ladies   May 8th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

No She conducted herself the same way she & Bill
did in the White House. That was more than enough for us.
President Obama has better things to do for us, than to deal
with those two. She not only showed poor judgment by voting
for the Iraq war, but showed even poorer judgment, & continued
lack of character in the way she conducted her campaign.
This was an interview for the job with us, the US voter, not her
cronies & lobbyists.

Mary Ann - Denver   May 8th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

No thanks!!! Billary is TOAST.

Gene, NY   May 8th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

He does not need to offer her the VP spot as it would give too much ammunition to the Republicans. I know that many of Senator Clinton’s female supports say they will not vote for Senator Obama. However, what they fail to realize, if McCain wins there is a likelihood that he may replace some of the liberal Justice on the U.S. Supreme court during his Presidency. Which means turning back the clock on Roe v Wade.

Linda from Prescott AZ   May 8th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

Jack,
No way! I’ve never considered it a good idea, but after her racially charged comments he would be crazy to offer her anything but a boot out the door. She has proven repeatedly in this campaign that she will say or do anything to win, the poor guy could never close his eyes or eat a morsal without fear of poisoning or worse.

Go home Hillary!
Mr. Obama start sending in postal change of address orders to 1600 Pennyslvania Avenue.

JR Veteran from New York City   May 8th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

Jack, an Obama-Clinton ticket would have been an ideal ticket in a perfect world however: The amount of excess baggages that the Clintons would bring back to Washington, DC will make the Obama Message of Change turned to Politic as Usual.

Therefore, as an old Democratic Supporter, I strongly suggest that the Obama Camp starts searching for an ideal Honest and Trustworthy VP and together with Obama, they can restore the image of this Great Nation that we called the United States of America.

Arin   May 8th, 2008 3:20 pm ET

Offer her a supreme court justice position…. that’s pretty good, and that should be all.

Stephen McGuire   May 8th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

I would have to laugh I don’t even think he’ll think about it unfortunately in the USA we still have many racis people all the older people the ones that come november actually vote and vote in huge numbers if he doesn’t pick her he will lose huge not just small but I think he’d be luck to win his own state. Just remember on general elections you need to win the big states which are your liberal states fortunately a democrat can win without winning the south but Obama will lose the big states like new york and california if a republican wins those states it is over for a democrat along with the northeast which he will lose look at the states she has won and add up the electoral college then add his up what do you get??

andy   May 8th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

I also find it interesting that Hilary makes a racial comment and no one says anything…Obama wears jeans on a plane and this is headline news.

Bias in the media perhaps?!?!

ralph butler   May 8th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Jack,
Absolutlely Not. That would be the most idiodic thing Barack could ever do. She would probably accept, only to get her foot in the door to bolster her argument that she should be crowned the Commander in Chief. If she’s the VP, ……….there goes his whole campaign message of change right out the window. And who wants ex-president Bill Clinton walking the wings of the white house again……..Scary thought. That would not be a dream ticket by any stretch of the imagination. It would be more like a nightmare! Think about it.. She already has this sense that she’s entitled to her turn no matter what. She does not want to win anything through fair play. She wants to win by changing the goal post in the middle of the game.

Ralph in Miami, Fl.

Aldo   May 8th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

No, Should the Pope be Jewish?

Dawn Martin   May 8th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Jack hearing people say they will vote for McCain if Obama or Hillary wins the nomination depending on whom they are backing is a joke.
Talk about arrogance.
Dawn
Brampton, Canada

Sujata   May 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

If he does, I hope she refuses. She has run the race and completed it and has opened the doors for future women to run. She should not be his VP.

Elaine   May 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

I am a middle aged white female republican who has been supporting Obama all this time. If Hillary is chosen as his running mate, there is NO WAY that I will even consider voting for him. He would be compromising all of his principles by running with her. I’d probably just sit the whole thing out. How offensive! After the way she has fanned the fires of racism in this campaign? Are you kidding me?

Gabe-TX   May 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

Very rarely do I agree with Obama-Radicals but here I go. Clinton should not be his number two. There’s no way they could tolerate eachother in those roles for 4-8 yrs. And yes, it does contradict his message of change so it would make him appear even more hypocrytical. I could see a Clinton-Obama ticket….maybe. She has the years and connections that he’ll need to influence the kind of change he’s after. It’s possible that version of the “Dream Ticket” could work.

Debbie in Seattle   May 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

Yuck. Talk about the odd couple. Bill Richardson, yes. Hillary Clinton nohow, noway.

Carol, Illinois   May 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

HI Jack……

NO…..NO…..NO NOT EVER,,,,,,Please…..

Ed   May 8th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

No. It would just give the Republicans to many ads running back all the insults she blasted Obama with. He should choose someone who has the same ideas of bringing the country together with commonalities, not fighting with everyone. Fighting is so old school not the future.

Susan   May 8th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Obama absolutely needs Hillary on the ticket. I’m one of those Florida voters who will not vote in the general unless Hillary is on the ticket. Note to Howard Dean: Florida voters did not break any rules. Why are WE being punished? And how’s it working for you so far?

Susan MO   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Clinton should be the president.

She is experienced, for all race of people, and a fighter.

She is a very strong person.

We need her for our president.

Mitchell Miller   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Hilary is doing all she can to not only derail Obama but actually change the rules (Michigan and Florida) and go against everything our country stands for which is majority rules. Obama has the popular vote and he has the delagates but that is meaningless to Hilary. She needs to go away quickly and should never be a part of the Obama ticket. He needs to pick someone who is young, progressive, a change agent, and compliments him. If he does that he will win. She is clearly not that person.

Dan (Kirkland, WA)   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

No. I am an Obama supporter however, I feel that Hillary Clinton’s strengths are far better served in another role. Perhaps Senate Majority Leader or something along those lines.

I would much rather see an Obama/Sebelius ticket in the fall.

Donna A   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

‘A House Divided Cannot Stand’ - so keep these Titans together to
go up against John McCain……just imagine the Thunder and Lightning
that this Dynamic Duo can muster to win the General Election….both will bring varied strenghts needed to put the Dems back into the White House - afterall isn’t that what the Dems truly want???

Keith   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

The dream ticket of Obama-Clinton could only work if Hilary takes some time to rally behind Senator Obama after all the votes are counted in his favor. The contradiction to “change” is more of a red herring at this point. If Obama wins the general election and becomes a two-term president, then he and Senator Clinton might build a solid Administration together. If she is actively involved as a Vice President, she would still be the leader of the Senate. She would have an influence on the Senate and the Presidency.

Aaron, ATL   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

He needs Hillary as VP like he needs to be eating dinner at Rev Wright’s house. If she were VP she would be making the 3am call that the President has been poisoned!!! LOL But seriously I really don’t think he should offer her the spot, he should instead offer the position to someone who appeals to the older whites in rural/working class areas to supplement his “perceived weakness”.

Michelle   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

No. There are too many wounds.

larry from minnesota   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

After Hillary’s comment that Obama is losing the support of White America, I think she just disqualified herself. What is so very good about the Obama candidacy is that it shows that we Americans can finally rise above our long history of racism and contempt for people of color.

Ron E.   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Why not. Jack Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson ran a successful although close campaign in 1960 and they were political enemies. An Obama and Clinton ticket would be a historic ticket especially if they win and I think together they could. He is not going to let her tell him what to do. Hillary has proven in the Senate that she can work with the Republicans. Let;s be honest what VP in the past has had any influence on the president except for the possible exception of Cheney. Hillary is very smart and will work for the party no matter what.. Besides she would help win the big states that she has won in the primaries. Lastly, she should stay in the race so that the 8 million people who haven’t had a chance to vote for Hillary or Obama can place their votes for the candidate of their choice.

Brandon Rowe   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

I think it’s funny that people are taking such strong stances with Obama and Hillary. Their political ideas are nearly identical. The only difference they seem to repeat is that Obama is the fresh blood that’s needed in the white house, and Hillary has the experience that’s needed in the White House.

For me the issues are a lot more important than the slogans, and their stances on the issues are nearly identical, so I don’t see why a joint ticket would be so crazy.

Although, after this campaign, in terms of getting the most votes a joint ticket wouldn’t work because of their harsh criticisms of each other, although they’re only criticizing each other to win, not because they actually think there’s something work criticizing.

Richardson would also be a good VP pick for Obama I think. A lot of foreign policy experience for the win.

Jon Glaser   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

This option would definately bridge the divide among democrats in November. However; each camp would somehow have to address the negatives that each had for another… ie, Rev. Wright, experience, ie, change in Washington, honesty (sniperfire). They would have to be more prepared as a team, than if they were individual Nominees to go against McCain.

Rick in Detroit   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Who are these “intermediaries” that George is referring to? It would help to know names so we atleast know which politicians have half a brain and which ones don’t. Letting a Clinton near the White House again to “do their thing” would be a disgrace. By the way, having George, former White House spokesman for the Clinton’s, be the mediator of a debate among democratic candidates, smooth move - that was the worst debate I’ve ever seen - thanks George. Obama should distance himself from the former First Lady as best he can - if she ever concedes!

Msljgrady   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

If Senator Obama thinks he can win without the block of Clinton supporters who would either stay home or vote for MCCain as I will, I say by the time November 3rd. rolls around he won’t even come as close as McCain. By this will definitely be an amusing spectacle to observe. By the way Senator Clinton don’t accept, when Senator Obama looses handlily the whining of the Democrats will be at an all time high. Newly Republican

Ronald   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

If he is to have even a slight hope of winning in November, then yes, he should beg her to be his VP. It seems like a no-brainer that he should offer it to someone who has over 1600 delagates, millions of supporters, and who one many large primary states. It would be a waste to give to a weakling like Richardson who won nothing and impressed nobody.

Ronald D.
Bloomingdale, Georgia

Jeff, NY, NY   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

The “dream ticket” is a dud. Once Barack secures the nomination, he needs to select a VP candidate that furthers his argument for CHANGE. He does not need to pick a pol like Clinton or Edwards or Dodd. More importantly, he MUST NOT pick a white male governor like pawlenty or even a white female governor like sebelius. Whatever “executive” experience such a choice would bring to the ticket, Barack would immediately look as if he were pandering to the white electorate by subordinating himself to a white “handler,” no matter how ridiculous or false that would be. Barach should run with someone fresh, someone energetic, and someone with an equal depth of intelligence. Someone outside the washington fol de rol would be fantastic. Shirley Tilghman or Drew Gilpin Faust (presidents of Princeton and Harvard) would be fabulous. Or a CEO-type from outside the financial services and petroleum sectors.

Berta   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

I say abolutely not!!! Let him find out how great he will be as president otherwise Hillary would be doing all the work. Hopefully he will not be the nominee….what a shame!!!

Silly Liberals!   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

YeS hE sHoUlD!! aCtUaLly It DoEsN’yt MaTtEr As McCaIn WiLl DoMiNaTe!
SoCiAlIzEd HeAlThCaRe Is a JoKe!

Ron Reinknecht   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Hillary will never play second fiddle and Obama would be foolish to accept her if he wants take the government in a new direction.
However, what both Clinton and Obama are forgetting or deliberately omitting, is that the Congress makes the laws, not the Executive Branch. They better concentrate on changing the members of Congress.

Annette   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Jack…please!!

Even you know the answer to that. Having Hillary Clinton as Senator Obama’s VP is like letting the snakes come out of the grass into your house.

He would spend more time answering 3AM calls to clear up all the underminding she would have done the day before.

She has proven without a shadow of a doubt that she cannot be trusted.

NO WAY.

Meg in NH   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Yes, Yes, Yes,

This is the only solution to unite the party. I know the Obama supporters aren’t crazy about it, but it is a political race and he has to win the constituancies that she is strong with. She will bring out the older voters and women…. These are the votes that McCain can get.

Be practical here folks, we have to win!

atypical white person   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

No, Obama needs to pick his own VP.

Let the HRC supporters go on and vote for McCain.

Seems like there are a lot of dissatisfied Republicans who are switching over to Obama anyway, not to mention Independents.

Robert   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

As a Canadian watching it from the “True North”. It appears that both want the control the “destiny” of being President. But if they both took a step back for one moment. They would relaize that the two of them can “Change” the world! and “Will” change the world if they were both on the ticket.

Good Luck America! Your future is bright! with these two.

Robert
Winnipeg, Manitoba ,Canada

Bob in JAX FL   May 8th, 2008 3:39 pm ET

Yes, that’s the only way he will get my vote.

Todd in Las Cruces, NM   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Terrible, terrible idea. The Democratic Party needs to acknowledge the Clintons, but they are no longer in charge. Party members have elected a new course for the Fall, and harkening back to the old days will not be a winning theme in the coming election.

Anne, Houston TX   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

I say no to a Clinton and Obama ticket. It would not be fair to have Clinton, who has the ability to lead and implement change continuously and simultaneously, settle for second. She would be doing all the work, while Obama would get the credit. Nor would Obama make a good vice president for Clinton; he would not keep pace with her visions; he would coast in his role.

Jill from Minneapolis   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Jack,

No!!! LBJ, anyone? She’d kill him. He encompasses his message of change in many ways…to put her on the ticket would endanger his life and his vision for change.

I say no to the so-called “dream” ticket. As far as myself and many of my “stupid white” friends and coherts feel, Obama is that on his own!!

Go Obama ‘08

Leona Dawson   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Hillary doesn’t need on Obama ticket. She should be the one on the ticket and Obama out of there period.

Alicia   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

No! the longer she stays in the race the more foolish she looks. As far as I’m concerned she needs to work on her judgement and math skills about winning the nomination. Please Hillary, step down with some dignity left.

Karl E.Schneider   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

The perfect fit for Obama would be Wesley Clark. Hillary is just to divisive and would drive voters away from him. Having Clark would help his national security credentials.

Karl
Cambridge, Ma

George   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

When President Clinton was in office this country was well respected around the world. Today not even US smallest enemy scares because of this administration. This the most important issue here along with economy etc. Senator Obama does not have such capacity to restore this image again because he is not well known to the world. What don`t you get all of you?

Drea   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

As a lifelong Democrat - it makes me sick with the negativity flowing between supporters of both candidates. I’m a Clinton supporter and chose her because of her views on Healthcare.

For Obama supporters to spew the venom they do against her is just sad. Don’t they realize that they need some of her supporters if he gets the nomination? Both these candidates have played negative - there is no way you can say Obama hasn’t!!! He is not the messiah and has made many mistakes in this campaign and has admitted that. If he does it in his campaign - how can I believe he won’t make qualified decisions running our country?

As it stands right now - as I read all the above comments - I will vote for McCain before I vote for Obama.

Peter from CA   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

Jack-VP trumps senator. She’ll graciously accept. Team Obama is saavy enough to know what she brings to the table; that which he lacks. We’ll soon have Michelle and Chelsea trading make-up secrets. “Ebony and Ivory” will be played at the convention, just you wait!

Bob C   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

No. Bill Richardson would be a much better choice. But he could offer her a seat on the Supreme Court.

Jessica   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

I really am blindsided by all the support that Obama is getting?How many people have heard about him before this? I never have, and we are suppost to trust the man to run our country after his great fellow friend of a pastor on national tv said all the bad things about the government and the USA, remember folks this pastor befriended Obama for 20 years, and you don’t think that his views rubbed off on Obama?just a little? I mean Obama supported this mans hate for 2o YEARS! Alot of you have forgotten what Hilary has done and we have heard of her. When her husband was president our economy soared! If it weren’t for Oprah then where would Obama be? Broke, and never heard of? I think that we are desperate for a change, and who wouldn’t be after Bush? But all these red Flags are going up with Obama I mean come on why are we ignoring them, arent we smarter than that? Thank you Hilary for Standing up for what alot of us believe Half of the USA, we will not worry if you are not the next president of the united states, the house will make sure Mccain WINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yes we will!!

ForJoshua   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

If Hillary wasn’t so polarizing and had so much baggage with her it would be a good idea…However she has a lot of baggage and his name is William Jefferson Clinton. I think it would be a grave mistake for Obama to invite her on his ticket. He should not be pressured to put him on her ticket…he should be allowed to choose his own running mate with confidence and integrity just like he has run his campaign, A-1.

Jim   May 8th, 2008 3:40 pm ET

No. If Hillary wants the vp slot she should publicy campaign for it. She needs to be on board with Obama’s message of real change.

<