CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HLN



April 14, 2008
Posted: 04:55 PM ET

FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:

The tsunami of voters to the polls looks like it will continue to sweep through states like Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Indiana.

In fact, more than a half a million people are either newly registered or have switched their registrations so they can weigh in on the Democratic primaries in those 3 states.

This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise when you consider the tremendous interest generated by the race between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Record voter registration and turnouts – particularly on the Democratic side – are what we’ve been seeing all along since the Iowa caucuses.

In Pennsylvania, where only registered Democrats can vote next Tuesday, more than 300,000 people have completed new registrations or switched to vote Democrat since the first of the year.

North Carolina, whose May 6th primary is open to Democrats and unaffiliated voters, has at least 122,000 people who are newly registered. And there could be even more new voters since a “same-day registration” law there lets people register and vote early between April 17th and May 3rd.

As for Indiana, its primary also on May 6th is open to all voters, and about 150,000 new ones have signed up since January 1st.

One expert on voting trends tells The Boston Globe that all this interest in the primary season quote “is an indication that we’re going to see a very high turnout rate in the general election, perhaps as high as we haven’t seen in a century in American politics.”

But others question whether all the excitement will last and if new voters will remain engaged in politics after this presidential election.

Here’s my question to you: How does your interest in the 2008 elections compare to past elections?
Interested to know which ones made it on air?


Olga from Ontario writes:
This race between the Democrats is so exciting and it’s good to see the young people getting involved. Obama has instilled this and I think it’s a good thing for the country. My husband and I can’t wait to get home to click on CNN to watch what has taken place all day. I agree with the other Canadian comments: if Obma doesn’t win, we would love to have him in our county.

Mabel from Georgia writes:
This is the most interesting election in my lifetime. The non-issue becomes an issue and the graft that is done goes away with the next news headline. We never visit the storyline for any length of time. We have people making excuses for why they do not like the black guy. Saturday Night Live makes fun of them all. There is never a dull moment.

Nancy writes:
Jack, Your question makes me think about one of my favorite bumper stickers: “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention!” I would hope everyone’s engaged! I’m an ardent Obama supporter … “bitter” about what the Bush administration has done to our country and “clinging” to the ideals of this nation. I have to believe that there are better days ahead!

R.C. from Philadelphia writes:
At the age of 28, this is only the third presidential election I have had the privilege to vote in. After the blunder in 2000 and the weak Democratic presidential candidate in 2004, this is a very important election to me, so I have been paying close attention.

Joe from St. Louis, Missouri writes:
I am in this to stop the lunatic Republicans. I hope to see jobs for Americans again. That is how your parents were able to raise you.

Tim writes:
I hope my vote will keep the whiskey-drinking, bullet-dodging and pantsuit-wearing princess out of the most important office in the world. Things are bad enough as it is.

Filed under: Elections


Carol c.   April 14th, 2008 2:04 pm ET

NEVER have I been so interested in politics–we never had a candidate that was not Washington establishment before! For the first time I feel like our candidate “gets it”.

I actually have CNN eyestrain and even record your blog when I am going to be away from the TV. Does that answer your question?

Carol
Knoxville, TN

Taj   April 14th, 2008 2:12 pm ET

My interest in this election is top notch. I understand the process of primaries & the election much better. Very much interested to vote to get rid of the Republicans. This country needs to slip into prosperity.
Ca

Mark - Asheville, NC   April 14th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

It’s more a matter of deja vu. In some elections (1964, 1976, 1992, 1996) I knew without a doubt that Dems would win, and my interest level was at a peak. In others (1972, 1980, 1984) it was plain that Dems could not win under any circumstances, so I was detached. In the third group (1968, 1988, 2004) it was sheer frustration because Dems were clearly nominating someone who could NOT win, and we are about to do it again! Yet I am interested but in a different way: we are going to lose, and it will be morbidly fascinating to see how it plays out.

Terry from California   April 14th, 2008 2:13 pm ET

The same. I have always been involved with past elections as well. However, I feel that this election is destroying the strength of the Democratic Party, which really concerns me.

I wish Senator Clinton would drop out so we can move forward.

sandy in Ohio   April 14th, 2008 2:14 pm ET

Jack, I have always been interested in the elections starting with the election of Jack Kennedy in which I was not old enough to vote. I am more interested this year because I think the voters have some tough decisions to make. They let themselves be led around by the Republicans with the talk of gay marriage and abortion and lost sight of the real issues facing this country and look where we are today. I want to believe that the U.S. citizens will wake up before we all are standing in bread lines and sleeping on the streets. How can we continue to tell the rest of the world how they should govern themselves when we have made such a mess at home and abroad.

Tom from Boston, Mass.   April 14th, 2008 2:17 pm ET

How does my interest in the 2008 elections compare to past elections? That’s simple, Jack. I never heard of you before, and now I find myself posting comments on your blog on almost a daily basis. If I were you, I’d thank God that this is an exciting race because your ratings, popularity, and book sales have probably never been higher. I just hope you appreciate that!

Don Blue Springs, Missouri   April 14th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Its is a lot more interesting that elections I have voted in since 1972. I think the main reason is retired and really have time to listen to everyone speak out. I finally have the time to compare it to the other elections and just as they were before you can see the canidates change as the primarys go from state to state. Its funny how they start out saying one thing and end up saying something totally different. But what I have learned from it all is the realization that no matter what race, gender or political preference; they are only politicians and their goal is to get elected, and that will never change.

Larry from Georgetown, Tx   April 14th, 2008 2:24 pm ET

On a scale of 1 to 10; 2004 was about a 5 and this one is a 10. We need a true leader that can bring us out of the abyss of the past 20 years of Bush’s and Clinton’s tactics and decency. NAFTA, IRAQ, scandals in the White House, global warming issues, immigration, lies and more lies, Bosnia sniper fire, housing issues, credit card interest rates, China is buying us, Social Security; these things must change if we expect to leave this country to our kids and grandkids in decent shape.

Patricia   April 14th, 2008 2:27 pm ET

While I’ve always been interested in elections and have campaigned for Nixon (blame my parents–I was 10 yrs. old!) LBJ, Frank Church, McGovern, etc., this tops them all.
Also, as a high school teacher, I have never in 25 years of teaching seen so much interest–not ever.
We’re all for Obama, of course. And we will not be denied :)

Boise, ID

Rick Medina,OH   April 14th, 2008 2:28 pm ET

Jack,

I’ve put heavy man-hours into every election since I turned 18 … 36 years ago. That includes the mid-term elections many voters conveniently forget about. The candidates change … the issues evolve. My interest level does not.

Ed Reed   April 14th, 2008 2:32 pm ET

I had more interest in the 2004 election, since I felt the decision to invade Iraq was a huge mistake; however, I think the rest of the country now agrees we need to take our country back from this cabal.

Ed Reed
Port Aransas, TX

Colleen Brooks, North Carolina   April 14th, 2008 2:35 pm ET

Always Interested. Always vote. I have often voted for the loser-not this time. The democrats need and will win in November.

It DOES seem that the 18 year olds are highly motivated to vote this year. I haven’t noticed that in the past.

Rosalynd Orlando Florida   April 14th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

I was plugged in in 2004 and was so angry when Bush was reelected. Now I am so plugged in that not only do I follow the election daily because of Candidate Obama , but this Independent voter has actually donated money to a presidential campaign for the first time in my life . I will volunteer in Florida to work for the general campaign if Obama is the Democratic nominee.

Yes We Can
Obama 08!

Jerry, Fayetteville Tennessee   April 14th, 2008 2:37 pm ET

This is the first primary election I’ve participated in after over 30 years of voting for President, as it’s the first primary election that has the chance of providing a candidate from both parties that I would consider voting for in the general election. Competition is good, Jack!

Adrienne M New York   April 14th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

There were elections before this year?

Seriously,I’ve always been interested, but you wouldn’t be able to tell by my voting record… I registered to vote this year for the first time.

Obama gets some credit, but he’s right to say Bush gets some too; the past 7 years have showed me that it really does matter whose in the White House.

Sandy   April 14th, 2008 2:44 pm ET

I think I might be ‘addicted’. Does that answer your question?

Seriously, in the beginning, I thought we had three candidates of integrity. Now, I think there is one candidate - Obama.

McSameDrain - I am really losing any respect for him and actually, getting downright frightened with all of his slip ups. I worry about his age. He is an American hero, just not presidential material at this age.

Don’t even get me started with Hillary. I fume anymore. What a chameleon. Listen to what Obama is saying. A few weeks ago, SHE campaigned on the premise people were losing hope and becoming angry.

And now she calls him elitest. Unreal.

Her and Bill have cost taxpayers almost as much of the other two living ex-presidents in presidential retirement benefits.

The retirement allowance through the end of this year will be nearly $8 million, compared to $5.5 million for George H. W. Bush’s and $4 million for Jimmy Carter’s during the same period.

As taxpayers, when are we going to wake up and realize the Clintons could almost be downright evil - and we just let them get by with it.

Sandy in NE

Michael Lorton, Virginia   April 14th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

I was never really interested in past elections, however, this election is history in the making. I have never been this excited about an election before. Hillary, with her old style politicis and her flowery rhetoric, and Obama, and individual who can provide this nation with a firm and new sense of direction. There is no excitement anywhere in the world, short of war, to match the excitement of the the 2008 American presidential campaign……..and to think we are engaged in both.

Laura in Muncie, Indiana   April 14th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

I’m much more interested in the primaries this time around than I’ve ever been but I’ve always been highly interested in the general election.

Gigi in Alabama   April 14th, 2008 2:45 pm ET

No more nor no less than in elections past. I have always been politically active since I could first vote.
I believe people might be more apt to vote if we would abolish the electoral college and rely solely on the popular vote. Even though I have voted in every election since I turned 21 in 1968, my vote for president has only counted once. I lived in Michigan at the time and that state went for Lyndon Johnson.

Peter Pan Fairview, Texas   April 14th, 2008 2:46 pm ET

I never have voted in 45 years until this year. This was the first year I ever registered to vote. So far I have been called for Jury Duty ( That has never happened before) and I have been disillusioned by the rotten candidates. There is no up side to voting. Half of the people will be delighted with the candidate that wins and the other half will not be so happy. In about 3 years all the voters will be forming a lynch mob because of their disappointment in the one that got elected. Anyone that votes and expects change is a wasting their time. They are all politicians. They all make promises they can’t possibly keep and are spending our money trying to keep those promises. They are just setting us all up for failure with their lofty ideas and no way to achieve them.

Patricia -Lexington, Ky..   April 14th, 2008 2:48 pm ET

Hi Jack - I’ve always been interested in politics but never like this. I’m absolutely fired up - actually, I have been since W. was re-elected in 2004. I am so sick of him and just haven’t been able to wait till we had some choices. So I guess I have to credit Bush with some of my enthusiasm cause I know he won’t be back!! YAY!!

Don from Ontario Canada   April 14th, 2008 2:49 pm ET

Interest is more now than ever and all due to Barack Obama. I know one thing if for some unknown reason the United States doesn’t want Barack for President he should run for office in Canada we could use a person like him here for a refreshing change.

G Riverside, nj   April 14th, 2008 2:52 pm ET

This is a watershed election, the future truely is now. If you are a citizen of this country and you are not inerested in this election you have either been living under a rock for the last 8 years or you are a Bush apologists and are happy with the status quo. Or economy is failing, are troops are fighting in the middle of a civil war, our climate is changing faster then anyone anticipated, we are losing quaity jobs to overseas sweatshops, Millions upon millions can’t afford health care and thats just for starters. Do I have a higher than normal interest in this election, your damn right I do.

Les Young Oklahoma   April 14th, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I think people are tired of having a government that does as it likes such as the Bush administration and want a saying in this country future. They don’t want policies shoved down their throats. A change is coming.

Ms MN   April 14th, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I am a 67 year old woman who has voted in every presidential election since I was 21. This year is probably the most important election in our history since we have a candidate who has connections with pure evil. I shudder to think what will happen if Barack Obama gets elected. Just Can’t Happen.

This election is crucial to our survival as a free nation. I hope everyone is paying attention to the underlying spirit of this man and will cast their vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Jan Davis, Knoxville, TN   April 14th, 2008 2:58 pm ET

As a Yellow Dog Democrat, I have been interested in politics from high school and college on. However, I can say that this is the most exciting and unusual election since 1960 when John F. Kennedy won. Maybe this year’s one is even more exciting than the 1960 one. I watch CNN every night and appreciate your excellent coverage of Politics ‘08. Thanks Jack (and I believe you are for my candidate Barack Obama).

Juanita   April 14th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

I was somewhat interested in the 2000-2004 elections. I became interested in this election in February 2008 while listening to Sen. Obama give a victory speech after winning one of the primaries.

I searched the web for his site and began reading everthing about him. I thought to myself, finally! Someone with integrity. Since that time, I have witnessed him admit to being wrong, humble himself and get back on focus.

Admission of being wrong is something politicians do not do.
There is something very genuine, very special about Barack Obama.
This country needs him more than they know.

Velle In Halifax   April 14th, 2008 3:00 pm ET

In past elections, one theiving, coniving, disingenious, self-interested grifter was pretty much the same as the other. My interest, my ONLY interest in this election is founded on hope. For the first time probably 4 decades, I’m seeing ONE who may have the courage, undaunting energy, stalwart integrity, and vision to attempt to stem the escalating spiral corruption betrayal by insensitive, self-promoting, greedy, lying, cowardly, and downright stupid egomaniacs that attempt to “govern” what was once the greatest Democracy in the World!
Barack Obama will have his hands full, but any other choice will continue the ever-increasing spiral of destruction that has the US circling the drain.

Mae   April 14th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

The interest in this election has served to educate the American public about the brokenness of our government, our political process but more importantly, about the “quality” of individuals we elect. The longer this Democratic primary goes on, the more we discover about the candidates, the deeper the worry becomes about the future of America. Please, isn’t there a SUPER, SUPER delegate out there with the courage to stop this self-serving drama.

Karen - Branson, MO   April 14th, 2008 3:02 pm ET

My interest is much higher now than ever before and I’m 58. However, should Hillary steal the nomination and run against McCain, you’ll probably see a drastic drop in your numbers…so don’t count the ducks yet.

Hillary didn’t create the new jobs for New York that she promised as senator, she voted for the war in Iraq instead of carefully thinking about it, everyone around her is for free-trade deals which makes her opposition very suspicious…I see not much difference of Hillary or McCain. The same old politician stuff that’s gotten us into the wrong war and tearing up our economy. The same old lobbying and big business payouts. Hillary and McCain are more alike than most think.

Glenn; Bakersville, NC.   April 14th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

Jack,

Never in my life have I been more involved in the election process than I am right now. I’m a 43 year old white male who is a veteran and former Republican. I am now an independent who for the 1st time may actually be helping elect a presidential candidate I not only support, but believe in due to his message, not his party! I’ve become actively involved in blogs, newsgroups, campaign websites, and all things CNN. Thanks to you and the best damn political team on TV and the web.

Glenn

Go Obama!

Mike   April 14th, 2008 3:05 pm ET

The same…

Jack,

Your question should be asked to the media… it seems this year the media coverage has been 5 times the usual… I think politcs is getting more buzz because of the writer’s strike and the lack of nightly TV shows… Americans have to get their fix of drama!!!

Daniel   April 14th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

My interest in this election season has increased 10 fold for elections past. I wonder why?

`Bitter in Ga and voting for Obama`

lou from Iowa   April 14th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

There was a writer’s strike on tv this year…there was nothing else to watch but these two going at it. Funny thing is that the race for the nomination has turned out to be a pretty entertaining show. At the very least, they have saved us from reruns!

Tamar, Philadelphia   April 14th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

What an opportunity! A once in a lifetime opportunity to vote for a person like Barack Obama. I’m as fired up as I have ever been. After living 19 years in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), 19 years in Israel, and now 20 years in the United States - and after being a politically active citizen in each country, this is the first time in my life that I am this fired up. I wrote on “twitter” this morning: “I go to sleep hoping for an Obama Presidency, and wake up thinking about it. I guess it’s my way of praying.”

I am as excited as I can be and have the audacity to hope!

Sandra   April 14th, 2008 3:07 pm ET

The same. I always look at the resume, which few people do including the media. Then I make my decision. I’m proud to say that I never voted for George W. Bush or his father.

Harry   April 14th, 2008 3:07 pm ET

I probably haven’t been this interested in decades, as I want to see change. Maintaining the status quo, does not bring out new voters either.

Change is what is driving this election and the incumbents need to be very wary of their total constituencies. While everyone is watching the presidential race, another big section of our government is up for grabs, as well.

I get the sense that Hillary and McCain represent the status quo.

Harry
Ky.

Sara from Gary, Indiana   April 14th, 2008 3:08 pm ET

As a college student on the verge of graduating, I have taken a great interest in the 2008 election. I met Sen. Obama at a town hall event in Gary and he is passionate about every single person in this country. I can’t say the same for Hillary who has been to every city in Northwest Indiana except for Gary and John McCain who won’t even send a lock of hair to the city limits. If the two actually came to Gary, they would understand where the “bitter” comments came from.

Sue, Bloomington, IN   April 14th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

This is the first election where I’ve put my money where my mouth is. I’ve donated to Obama and I’ve donated my time. Times are too uncertain and scary to not care about this election. I guess I’m just to ‘bitter’ to risk Clinton or McCain winning the white house this time.

April in texas   April 14th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Well this is the first year ever I have done more than vote for the lesser of the choices. This year I finally felt good that I was actually voting FOR a canidate. Its also the first time I ever donated to a campaign and I will admit I never check the box on my tax return for the presidental election simply because I cant afford it. If Obama doesnt win, I will crawl back in my hole like the groundhog and wait until this election is over.

Obama 08
April in Austin Texas

James   April 14th, 2008 3:09 pm ET

Jack ,

I am 51 years old and have always voted , but i have never been excited about it until now. Obama has brought millions of new voters into the process , young , old , and even hardcore Republicans like my 73 year old sister that stated with tears rolling down her face ; for the second time in my life i will be voting Democrat , and i will proudly cast my vote for a great American ” Barck Obama”.

He is the real deal.

James
Eugene Oregon

Tim from Toledo, Ohio   April 14th, 2008 3:10 pm ET

In the early part of the campaign my interest was far higher than it has ever been - but as the campaign has turned into a mud slinging contest, my interest has waned. I’m tired of hearing about preachers and snipers, I want to hear what the candidates are going to do about the economy and the war.

I think I will become interested again after Hillary finally bows out and we get the opportunity to hear McCain and Obama debate the issues.

Aaron B.; Champaign, IL   April 14th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

I’m very interested in the 2008 election… to a point. There’s a sand bar out there in presidential politics that still exists, where egos muscle in and discussions of common sense issues take a back seat to what’s hot or what’s popular. This election may have the largest turnout in decades for our country, but in the end, it’s still just politics.

Alonzo Demetrius, FL (USA)   April 14th, 2008 3:11 pm ET

Too bad the democrats have selected two real losers who are about to kill each other off, having forsaken all the proven statesmen who were in the race earlier. Shame on you!!

Just imagine what this country will be like in a couple of years with either of them in the White House. This country will be totally divided where the government can’t get any support from either side. They are both very negative about the US (bad judgment) and have already divided the democrat party.

Jeremy, MA.   April 14th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Sorry to burst the enthusiasm bubble, but when was the last time a political candidate lived up to the hype?

I feel desperately sorry for all these Obama supporters, especially the young first time voters, who’ve been duped into believing that he’s some kind of Messiah who’s going to solve all our problems.

His message of hope is a cruel and false panacea. We’re being exploited by just another opportunist politician.

Tony,.......Lou, Ky.   April 14th, 2008 3:13 pm ET

Jack……….Ive always been interested in voting. My problem has been that I cant tell the difference in any of the candidates, except McCain will let more troops die to secure Iraq instead of his own country. Then again, none of the candidates will secure our country regardless of the war! Fortunately for the president, the congress makes and passes laws in this country. Since they cant agree on anything vital to our security, healthcare, or anything else, what difference does it make who’s the next bafoon, I mean President?

Realistic   April 14th, 2008 3:14 pm ET

The vast majority of the new voters are coming in because of Obama — neither Clinton nor McCain have attracted a new voter under age 35 within the last decade.

McCain and Clinton are simply different sides of the same coin, and nothing will change under either of them. Hillary will flounder around with healthcare and achieve no results, just like she did with HillaryCare in the 1990s, and McCain will run the war just as before.

Only Obama offers Americans the chance for real change, which is why he has electrified the electorate.

Alfie --- Palmdale, Cal.   April 14th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

I have been casting my vote since Ronald Reagan, and have always been intensly interested in the choices for the highest office. I think the real reason voters are turning out in record numbers, is much like the reason U.S. flags sold out everywhere shortly after 9-11. Too many people nowdays need a kick in the pants to be patriotic. Some want to make sure Republicans lose the White house. Some just want to make history by voting in a black or female. Too many people in the past have complained about our nation, without casting a single vote to change it. Coffee was brewed, and alot of people have finally waken up to smell it. Hopefully the trend will continue.

Alan, Buxton, Maine   April 14th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

I am one who would have voted for ‘none of the above’ in most of the previous elections. This one will be different. I hope Obama gets the nomination but will vote for the Democrat in any event. If John McSame gets elected I will seriously consider moving to Canada.

Chuck in Eugene Oregon   April 14th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

Jack,

This is election is an addiction to me. I spend more time watching news and following the candidates than I have in my life. I am one of those that want to see a new direction and a breath of fresh air away from the old politics of the past. I would love to see this presidential campaign transend into a new house and senate also.

Barbara Hazleton, PA   April 14th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

Jack,
Never before in history has race, gender, and age been a factor in a
Presidental election. It’s sort of like playing the Trifecta in horse racing. This campaign keeps you on the edge of your seat , especially when you can’t believe what spills out of their mouths. Watching these candidates is 100% better than the soap operas.

Lynn from Tennessee   April 14th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

I would call this election season the most interesting one I have ever seen in my 59 years. I have always followed the elections closely, but I have never had a candidate inspire me like Barack Obama. I hope that the news I’m hearing that Carter and Gore are trying to encourage Hillary to go ahead and drop out now is true. Nothing could make me happier!

Larry - Fulton, Ill.   April 14th, 2008 3:18 pm ET

I’ve been highly interested this year because of the economy,war, Social Security, Veterans Benefits, education , high gasoline prices, and the knowledge that if another Republican gets into office, the whole country will certainly disintegrate just like the Soviet Union. Common Sense and change are what are needed in D.C. and I can only see one candidate who has the “audacity and hope” to do it.

Kevin, Punxsutawney, PA   April 14th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

I’m very interested in this election, but only as much as the previous Presidential campaign. Just as then, I am VERY concerned about the course for this country. If we must suffer another four years of the Bushie legacy, it may take decades for us to recover.

Please, America, vote with a heart and a mind to make this better for ALL of us…and not only for the ultra-rich and “military-industrial complex/” (Not my words…there Ike’s.)

Candi South Carolina   April 14th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

This is the first time in my life that I am glued to the tube and monitor at work. This election is the first time I can really appreciate the views and why I voted for whom. I think that Obama brings about a great deal of electricty for change and I am hoping that he will be the President. Hillary would have been good but after really and carelully looking at her views, Bill in still in the White House and we don’t need that kind of Presidency. Bill has done his term and share of bad for the goods so let Hillary and Bill go enjoy themselves while Obama make this a better country.

Obama 08

JW - Georgia   April 14th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

This election is of particular importance to me because we will be getting rid of the biggest fool that ever hit the big time.

Janel, St. Paul, MN   April 14th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

I’ve always been very interested in the presidential races, but this year is unlike no other in my memory. It is like a live reality TV soap opera, with memorable actors.

Hillary is by far the most dramatic. She adds some levity because the viewers never know for sure which mood she will portray: an angry lady who feels that she alone can right all the wrongs in the world; a tearful, lady seeking sympathy; or a teller of dramatic “tall tales” hoping to sway viewers because of her bravery. She’ll never win an Emmy because she simply is not a good actress.

Her husband and our former president is the most passionate, especially when he shows great indignation that someone else might win the nomination, and he and his wife may have to retreat.

Barrack to many viewers is the hero because he strives to tell it “like it is” and “how it was.” He’s a cinch for some award.

Finally, there is McCain, who shouldn’t have been cast. He is simply too boring and repetitive.

Hopefully, this soap opera will have a happy ending!

Carl from Pa   April 14th, 2008 3:19 pm ET

Jack,
I am a farily young voter and so this is really the first primary I remember. That being said, it’s been very exciting and has gotten me interested in politics although with that comes much frustration. I hope that with whatever happens, the standard types of politics moves towards honesty and policy and not double talk.

Obama ‘08 - A new face in washington

Brian, Cincinnati   April 14th, 2008 3:20 pm ET

I’ve never followed politics before this year. The closest thing to following politics for me was watching the series “The West Wing” or the movie “Dave”. This year I’ve followed cable news and blogs every day. I can name every CNN reporter and anchor. I’ve even had a comment read on air by Jack Cafferty! I’ve watched online videos of speeches. I’ve even donated to a campaign…. Barack Obama’s.

So my interest in 2008 Elections is infinitely higher than prior elections. And if the nomination is stolen from Obama, it will be my last.

Brian, Cincinnati

Mary from Ky.   April 14th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

I wasn’t old enough to vote when JFK was running, but he made me wish I could. I watched his press conferences and really became interested in politics. This is the first election since then that has reignited that passion.

Andrew   April 14th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Some are new voters and some are mischievous republicans planning to vote in a way to perpetuate the race. I hope that most are new voters and will vote for Obama so that we can get on with the election.

Hillary needs to drop out for the good of us all.

Ken Mihalik   April 14th, 2008 3:22 pm ET

Jack, you and Jeffrey Toobin were being interviewed when the story broke about Barack Obama’s ill-chosen remarks in California concerning the “bitterness” of small-town residents in PA and similar areas. You both dismissed his comments as not only inconsequential but essentially correct. Nice call. You guys need to get out more, instead of having FEMA’s reaction after Katrina. Polls show Obama went from a dead heat with Hillary in PA then to her now having a 20-point lead. I am interested in this campaign largely because of the pandering and arrogance by both the candidates and the media. By the way, another network or two sized up the damage, something you by now hopefully have recognized, more accurately and promptly.

Renee L   April 14th, 2008 3:23 pm ET

I have not really been as engaged as I have in any previous election. For the first time I feel hope that we can move away from the divisiveness in Washington and across the country.

I am 46 and have voted in every Presidential election since 1980. This is the first election where I have actively donated and volunteered for a candidate. I do feel that if the right candidate is elected we can get rid of some of the partisan politics. I get so sick of the Red vs. Blue states and don’t think we are accomplishing anything. I am also very sick of this war of which I was never in favor of. As the Democratic election for the nominee wanes on, I do find that I am getting fatigued at some of the tactics but look forward to June 3.

Hopeful in GA!

JoAnn in Iowa   April 14th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

I have always been involved in politics, but this time is very different. This time I am not voting for the least worst of the bad choices available. This time I am voting FOR the best candidate and with enthusiasm and I’m donating money and my volunteer time. I am supporting Barack Obama. This time we have a candidate we can get behind and who will to tell us the truth and who wants to bring us along to do the hard work to come to bring this nation we love back to greatness. Bush has made an incredible mess. We have to have a president who can inspire us all to help with the cleanup. I want my country back. I am fired up!!

kenny cole   April 14th, 2008 3:24 pm ET

Lets us be realistic 90% of new voters want to vote because of OBAMA, this time around is the people chance they want CHANGE tired of the same old politics in washington they want to CHANGE the business

Alex H   April 14th, 2008 3:25 pm ET

This is the first election I’ve been able to vote in and I never thought I’d be this interested in politics. The election has captured my interest and as demonstrated by so many people on this and many other blogs, people have an emotional investment in the candidates.

Alex Herzog
Waterbury, CT

Dave, Chicago   April 14th, 2008 3:25 pm ET

I’m more interested in the 2008 elections than any previous elections. Af first it was because I was excited about the Democrats taking the White House. Then I was excited about having two strong candidates. Now, unfortunately, my interest has become like a morbid fascination with a highway accident, tuning in every day to see what sort of nasty comments have been made and who has been bloodied the most today.

Ralph at NYC   April 14th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

Jack, I’m used to one party blaming the other for our problems, and here the GOP is supposed to be taking a beating for Bush’s blunders — not unusual from past elections, such as 1968 when the Democrats were blamed for our problems in Vietnam. What does interest me is watching an African-American and a woman vie for the highest position in our country.

Ilona Proud Canadian   April 14th, 2008 3:27 pm ET

You said it Don from Ontario!!!!!!!!

Sen. Obama is really an inspiration. I have never seen so many young people, so inspired and hyped up to cast their vote. He is responsible for their “YES WE CAN” attitude. I have watched some of the videos in schools in America, and I am amazed at the way Sen. Obama has been able to get these young people to accept responsibility!

Sandy I agree with you, I too have become “addicted” I watch CNN almost all day now, except when they keep milking Sen Obama’s misrepresentations for all they are worth. When this happens I just switch to another channel.

I read these blogs daily and even leave some comments. Americans this man “Barack Obama” will turn things around for ALL Americans.
“YES HE CAN”

Travis, Los Angeles CA   April 14th, 2008 3:29 pm ET

I’m more interested in the current elections because I think Americans are ready to do what’s best for the country despite ideology. We’ve tired of red state/ blue state nonsense.

Martha Lynne -- Los Angeles, CA   April 14th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

Barack Obama has kept this election from being business as usual and a choice between two insiders who won’t change a thing in our national govt. I’ve been more excited than I’ve been since 40 years ago, when Bobby Kennedy gave me the same kind of hope for change.

Glenn - Michigan   April 14th, 2008 3:30 pm ET

My interest is very high, but for an unusual reasons. I usually angst over which candidate to vote for - I’m an independent and have voted for every presidential winner since Nixon. My streak ended when I voted for Kerry. I have no angst this time because I will not vote for either Dem candidate. But my interest is high because it’s like watching a train wreck in slow motion - fascinating stuff!

IFEANYI AZUBIKE Houston, Texas   April 14th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

My interest in the elections this year is electrifying. Barack Obama has generated a wave that is threatening to sweep through the country like the tsunami that you aptly titled it. His message does not just sound refreshing but gives hope to every body that America is still a land of dreams and that your dreams can carry you as far as you are willing to believe. Since I qualified to vote, I have never missed voting out of duty, but this time, I am excited and can’t wait for November and that is because of the effect that Baracks message and personality has had this election year. He is like a breath of fresh air in a tainted, lack-luster, and unfaithful polity. Also important is the fact that the current state of the Union has raised awareness to what is at stake and defeated complacency. People are eager to take back our collective destiny rubbished by politicians who cling unto politics as usual to the detriment of our welfare.

Dori in AZ   April 14th, 2008 3:31 pm ET

Hola, Jack!

I’m a lifelong Democrat who votes not for party but for the individual candidate. Most of the time, that means mostly Democrats.

More people are interested and more people are registered and will vote because we are feeling a desperate need to heal our country. So much has gone wrong. So much of what is happening in our country and in our world is tearing us apart. So much is at stake for us, our children, our grandchildren, and all the others yet to be….

We need a change, a better direction than the course we are on. McCain doesn’t offer it. Clinton doesn’t offer it. My hope is riding with Obama. And, if something really bad comes to light about him that impacts my willingness to continue to support him, my vote will be for “None of the Above.”

Pamela   April 14th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

Jack,

My interest in the upcoming election for a new President of the United States has never been greater. The reason for this new found interest is two fold. First, never has our country been in such dire straits and in need for substantial change: Veterans being denied healthcare and homeless, millions of people losing their homes, gas prices so high soon we will not be able to afford to get to work, etc. etc. Secondly, we have never had a candidate who truly wants to serve for the good of ALL Americans, i.e. Barack Obama. Despite Hillary’s, McCain’s, and the spin Doctors’ unwillingness to admit Barack’s words simply did not come across as articulately as they normally do, I believe in hope and I believe that hope brings change. This is the first election I have ever been able to take part in where my vote will not be against a candidate, but a vote for a candidate.

St Johnsbury, Vermont

Anne/Seattle   April 14th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

Jack I’ve been watching elections on tv since the early 50’s when I was a little kid and over the years my interest in politics deepened. But as I’ve followed this election, I realize I’ve never been drawn in to such a degree as I am with this one. I feel it’s because of the lack of leardership and the demagoguery over the last eight years and that we have a black American and a woman as candidates this time. It’s fascinating to watch it unforld in spite of the fact that rit eally is running on far too long. My dearest hope is that all the new voters will remain involved in elections to come.

James in Cape Coral, FL   April 14th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

Jack,
That’s as simple as asking how George Bush compares to past Presidents. When thing’s are going well in America people have a tendency to let the cards fall where they may. But when our lives are being directly affected by the strategic blunders of our elected officials we tend to come out in masses to let our frustrations be known. So bring on November cause I’m ready to start firing some of these greedy, no good, do-nothings. This time a single vote can change everything.

Ed   April 14th, 2008 3:32 pm ET

I’ve been a news junkie for 30 years and enjoy the political years. What’s new this time around is it’s a real hoot! Don’t drop out Hillary, we’re having too much fun!

Rebecca   April 14th, 2008 3:33 pm ET

This year is by far much more more important as this fine nation has been in the bowels of politics for far too long. This is the first year since Kennedy that I believe that we actually have someone who not only wants change, but will succeed in getting the job done. We the people need Obama to take over and undo the damage done over the last 24 years of the Clinton/Bush era. McCain would be a mistake and we all know we cant trust Hillary with even the smallest task without some back-biting deal to go along with it.

The only one we can trust with the future of this country is Obama. God help us if we get anything less.

Dan, Chantilly Va   April 14th, 2008 3:34 pm ET

This will be the second time I will be able to vote in a national election. I wanted very badly to vote in 2000, but was just shy of 18. In 2004, I wasn’t interested at all, but voted for Kerry just because I didn’t want Bush coming back. This time around, I find myself checking these blogs several times a day and watching the news at night keeping up with what is happening. Although my interest has waned in the last couple of weeks because of information overload (9+ month primary season is just too long), I’m still devoting a lot more time to following this election than any other I’ve voted in.

Carol Martin   April 14th, 2008 3:35 pm ET

I find campaign the 2008 fascinating.
I am riveted, nay, addicted to cable,web,
and XM radio election coverage.
I contributed to a campaign for the first time ever!
It’s Obama or bust!

Cynthia   April 14th, 2008 3:35 pm ET

Previous elections do not even compare. I normally go in and vote for the lesser of two evils in the Democratic election and am done with it. But, this year I have watched the whole process unfold and must say I excited that we have someone running who is not a part of the old Washington set.

Jo Ann - HOUSTON,Tx   April 14th, 2008 3:35 pm ET

Jack, not since John F Kennedy, have I been more interested in the
comming election as I am now. The fact that Obama and possibily Clinton and the fact that our country is less respected than ever. The Dollar has gone down the tubes and all Bush can think of is getting more of our men and women killed which is easy for him since he has none over there. McCain is great veteran but I have not seen or heard of any of his son being over there so it’s easy to see why he would want to stay. Thats why we need him and Hillary at home.

G Chapman   April 14th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

I am a regular CNN watcher now becuase of this race.

Obama first caught my attention because he tells the truth as much as he is able under the circumstances compared to his rival. Even at his most negative he doesn’t come close to the vicousness of her campaign’s attacks from which he recovers for the most part.
She might have made it if she hadn’t gone so negative because she’s so strong. America needs an Obama right now.

G. Chapman
Toronto On

Karen DiVirgilio   April 14th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Jack: I am so tired of hearing your same old sour whine. You take everything negative about “your man” Obama and spin it to the positive. Barak Obama is only what the media has made him out to be. Look alittle closer and I don’t think you’ll like what you see - a reverse racist and a snob. Other than Lou Dobbs, you all at CNN are “Hillary Bashers”. What’s your problem - can’t stand to see a strong woman without becoming intimidated and thinking she’s a (b)witch?! I hope you read this - all you seem to read are positive comments about Obama and negative comments about my girl Hillary. What’s this, the “boys club”?

pat moore   April 14th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

I have been on the Obama party everysince he first ran for office in Illinois and then for
senator from Illinois and now I am hopeful he will be our next president. He and his family are average people like me and my family and friends and I am sure he will look out for us. Hillary is old time politics and withall their ewalth theydo not know how the rest of us struggle to just live,eat and pay our medical bills and pills. Lets have a new face in Washington, one who looks out for we average people. Pat Moore,Harvard, Illinois

David Abdalla   April 14th, 2008 3:36 pm ET

Jack:

I am finally captivated, interested and filled with hope. I find myself listening to you and other commentators or your caliber and I find myself rising of my couch clapping, and shouting yes!
It is like a good thriller with a bright and hopeful ending.

David Abdalla, Washington DC

R. Norton   April 14th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

. . . .If the republicans’ “Operation Chaos” is in play, I can’t wait for it
to backfire on them so that they can bow to Hillary Clinton as president.

Joe from New Jersey   April 14th, 2008 3:37 pm ET

It’s an addiction.

Dina - Philadelphia, PA   April 14th, 2008 3:44 pm ET

I have never been this excited about an election in my life. It is a historical event, that I can’t contain my enthusiasm! I eat and sleep politics. I can’t wait to have my chance to vote!

I talk politics everyday, I watch CNN everyday, I’m on CNN’s website everyday. I’m addicted!!

Anna, SW Missouri   April 14th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

I remember watching the conventions as a child in the 50’s and 60’s and I have always voted, but this is the first election since JFK that has stirred my heart. I am so proud of the younger generations and I pray that those over 60 do not forget that when they were that age they made the right decision and they should now let the younger generations take the lead for the future of this country.

Richard Sternagel   April 14th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Jack, my interest is increasing because of Sen. Barack Obama! Finally we have a politician who is not afraid to “tell it like it is.” We may not like what Obama has to say;but he has the Strength OF HIS COVICTIONS!

Jackie in Indiana   April 14th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Although I’ve voted I hadn’t volunteered to work for an election for many years until this year. Throughout my life I’ve heard people lament “Why vote? Nothing ever changes.” And even though people are angry and frustrated, they feel hopeless that their government will ever do anything for them.

We have a huge difference in the candidates this year: two candidates who say “Vote for me and I’ll work hard for you in Washington” and one bright voice who says “I can’t do this on my own, I need your help: When you help me win this election you and I can change Washington together.” It’s a new message, new era.

from a white over-50 woman from a small town in Indiana

Arnold,WV   April 14th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Hey Jack
I have voted in every election since 1975.I have shown more interest in this election than any other.I think that people are “Bitter” and looking for change ,hence the record turnouts.If any kind of poll was done I would bet the vast majority of these democrats are Obama backers.As a registered Republican I will probably vote for him in Nov,but never a Clinton…

Diane Jones   April 14th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

This election , finally has one candidate that truly cares about the people. (Barack Obama). As for the comments he made on last friday, he was right on. Hillary act as if the blue- collar workers in Pa is the only people that is suffering. If all the candidates down through the years had the guts Obama had ,we may not would have a president now, that should be brought up on treason. As for Hillary , I am so glad she was put in her place this morning by the steel workers.It was all a political trick anyway

dennis north carolina   April 14th, 2008 3:46 pm ET

I care about every election and have voted in every election from 1960. this election is more important because if we do not change the direction that our country is going we will become a failed nation or be over taken by another country.please don’t say that this connot happen because the roman empire was the greatest of ther time but they failed and were taken over.Question for Jack — Why before each primary the media comes up with some bitter news about obama or sheds a tear for HILLARY(the water is still flowing from New Hampshire). Oh, Hillary Shot a duck but In don’t hear fowl words about her. I know that is where she heard the snipper fire???

Hardy Takhar   April 14th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Jack…….This elitist garbage that Billary is spuing. How can someone making in excess of 100million be possibly in touch with common man. How can she possibly feel the pain of no house, no home, no job and no food. Yes we are damned bitter.A perfect example of “let them eat cake”

Chicago, IL   April 14th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

My interest has quadrupled! We cannot have another 8 years as we have already had with Bush. We need CHANGE, a new START. And that is not going to happen with another Republican in office.
United we stand, divided we fall

Peter-TX   April 14th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Jack, i just have one sentence for you, i don’t go to the movies anymore as i use to, i just stay home and watch cnn.

Peter

Dallas, TX

naknudson   April 14th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

This is the most consuming election since I have been voting because of the fact that our country is in the worst condition ever. Most Americans are really hurting and desperate to make changes as quickly as possible. I have never had it so hard financially so it is of vital importance to elect someone who will be best qualified to clean up all the mess Bush has made of our economy.

Joe in DE   April 14th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

Three things are responsible: 1. The great dissatisfaction with Bush. 2. The close Democratc primary race. 3. Obama generating some response from theyoung and other who do not usually vote.

Pamela   April 14th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

One rather insignificant pollster has shown a 20% lead of Clinton over Obama in PA. Two other more well known pollsters are showing a six point spread. Nationwide Obama is carrying his highest lead over Clinton - 10%. Obama’s remarks about “Bitter” Americans and what he clearly meant by those remarks are much more in touch with real America then his opponents and their supporters care to admit.

cali   April 14th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

Obama has brought something to politics that has not been seen in awhile!

Hope for change in a country in dire need of a saviour!

Obama 08!

Charles in Florida   April 14th, 2008 3:50 pm ET

Mr. Cafferty, I have voted by absentee ballot my entire military career. This election is the first election in that I’m totally engaged and very much interested in its outcome. I watch every news channel most of the day and contribute to the blogs on anything Obama! They will without a doubt have two new medical addictions to treat when this election is over, one for Obamamania and one Obamapobia.

Chris, Baltimore, MD   April 14th, 2008 3:52 pm ET

I think over the last few elections, many have not participated or made a true educated decision in the voting process. Those many now realize that poor voting decisions (or lack there of) will have a dynamic effect on all Americans and now see that on a personal level. In Maryland, our governor entered his first term with a 60% approval rating and that now hovers in the 30s. Buyers’ remorse or the regret in not voting drives the public’s awareness and involvemnt in the political arena both locally and nationally.

Allan   April 14th, 2008 3:53 pm ET

The voter registration numbers are very impressive, but what’s even more impressive is the actual voter turnout.

The Clinton/McCain crowds don’t understand that the game has changed. They’re still campaigning like it’s the 90s and you don’t have to appeal to the general public, just 50% + 1 of the people you are not able to discourage from voting with your negative campaigning.

These are the people who say Obama can’t win. And will still be saying it as he is sworn in on Jan. 20, 2009.

Allan
Folsom, CA

tim   April 14th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

to get g. bush out and to keep another clinton from disgracing the office is very important.

Ted, Beaverton, OR   April 14th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

Compared to elections back to 1959 when I first could vote, they are about the same. The biggest difference is that dirt can now flow at cyber speeds. Accusations and denials of wrong word choices can now be sent out via the internet in nano seconds. I bet Al Gore is mad as hell for electioneers using his invention for such chicanery.

BTW, If Hillary wins PA by only 1% she will consider it a “Huckadate” (Huckabee style mandate) to take a further beating in NC.

L.M.,Arizona   April 14th, 2008 3:59 pm ET

I think if your an American you could’nt help but have more interest in this election then any other. It could be the year for the first women,first black,or a young person as president everyone should be excited about that.

Neil K, Lake Forest CA   April 14th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

Jack,

When I was a graduate student at Arizona State, Walter Cronkite came to my school to speak. This was shortly before we headed into the war in Afghanistan, and he said something that has stuck with me. He said, “It’s not that Americans have a right to know what’s going on; we have a duty to know.” In other words, our system of government is dependent upon the awareness of the citizens of this country.

Before then, I didn’t much care about voting. I had before, but my choices weren’t as informed as they should have been. Since then, my level of attention has been raised.

John from Tennessee   April 14th, 2008 4:01 pm ET

Jack, I just can’t understand why the Obama supporters don’t want the very best person for president. Do you? Obama has already shown his true colors. They are yellow.He won’t admit to his lies,instead blames others, mostly the great Hillary, who is the very best choice to lead the country. We have already had a president that
doesn’t know what he is doing. Surely they don’t want another one.

MajR Killeen, Texas   April 14th, 2008 4:01 pm ET

Well, Jack, it’s interesting reading the usual airhead comments on this election. The voters who are coming into the process because of Obama are the worst of all. They bad-mouth Hillary and the country like this is the brink of the dark ages and we are destined for disaster. There have been other difficult times in our nation’s history and we made it through without the whining you hear on these blogs. I hope all these new voters stay involved, but, when their guy doesn’t win, or he falls short of their expectations in office, they’ll probably just drop out again.

bob pozsony   April 14th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

from Florida
People don’t take the time to register and vote in a primary unless they are motivated. It will be a record turnout especially if Obama is nominated. Unless the dem candidate shoots him/herself in the head, the GOP is toast this year. I think John McCain is a decent, honorable guy who will be crushed under his choice to align himself with Bush’s policies and continued “lets make it up as we go” stratagies in Iraq. We Americans may have been sleeping for the last few years but given the economy, the war and corruption only the most die-hard neo-cons will want to stay this course.

Ron Russell from SF   April 14th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Watching everyone get excited now, after Bush has screwed everything up, is like watching a Rancher close the gate after the horse is gone. Where were you folks when we could have prevented this damage from happening? Was it the Iraq War, the endless lies, the giveaway of the treasury to the Rich, the environmental destruction, the Massive Deficits or the Shredding of the Constitution that woke you up? I guess I should be grateful that you have an interest in prevent a 3rd Bush term, but I wonder if we can recover from your indifference.

Jim Barton   April 14th, 2008 4:02 pm ET

Jack, I’m excited about these elections. When it is all over, we’ll have to make sure we start candidates running in 2009 for the 2012 elections, so americans don’t go through the terrible political withdraw of not having candidates run…. - Jim Barton Malta, NY

Mota Nginya   April 14th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

Interested, are you kidding me? Jack, permit me to consider your question the biggest mistatement since Hilary Clinton’s Bonia sniper saga. This is the only country in the world where people preach about things they clearly know is non sense but do so all the same just for heck of it.

It about time we do everything within our reach to rollback the craziness of the Bushed - Cheneyed policies and the only way we can do that is by electing Senator Obama as our president. Lets’ quit this crapy snipering among fellow Dems and start thinking about inovative ways to put this derailed America back on track.

Bruce St Paul MN   April 14th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

I have always voted, but I have been complacent. I thought that no president could really hurt us too badly. After all, we have three branches of goverment. Checks and balances.A free press. What happened? U.S. attorneys were ordered to influence elections, congress caved in on every issue because they couldn’t handle being called unpatriotic, The president turned out to be part of a larger movement that has its own secret agenda. And the voters? We voted against our own interests for people that we don’t agree with. Again. This time I hope everyone votes. Twice.

Heather, Austin, TX   April 14th, 2008 4:04 pm ET

This is the first time since I have been old enough to vote that George Bush isn’t on the ballot. Although I voted in the last two presidential elections, I was very detached from the process because I knew, as a Texan, my vote didn’t exactly mean alot. This year, though, I really feel like every vote counts, and I have thrown my support so whole-heartedly behind my candidate that I can’t wait to cast a vote for him in November!

Karl in CA   April 14th, 2008 4:05 pm ET

I didn’t realize until last weekend that I really am bitter with the McCain/Clinton Beltway system. We need to start over, so to speak, and the best way is to replace the current Washington mind set with a government that really is of the people, by the people and for the people, not of the lobbyists, by corporate America and for the wealthy.

mitchell martin ark.   April 14th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

the only time i ever voted was for ross perot,because of his message of change.with obama,i have a reason to vote again.i think the new and first-time voters,have mostly come out for obama ,because we’re bitter,bitter,bitter….

W B in Las Vegas   April 14th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

nothing like totally incompetent government at all levels to get the voters attention, Jack.

time to throw out every incumbent in every office at every level in November. as for those elections that have no incumbent running, like this years Presidental race, we can at least switch parties as that will have a greater chance of change.

Amanda   April 14th, 2008 4:06 pm ET

This very well may be the first election in my lifetime that does not have a Bush or a Clinton on the ticket, so yes there is more excitement for this election than I have felt for others, but the excitement is for change; change this country very desperately needs.

Valparaiso, IN

Olga   April 14th, 2008 4:07 pm ET

This race between the Democrats is so exciting - and good to see the young people getting involved. Obama has instilled this and I think its a good thing for the country. My husband and I can’t wait to get home to click on CNN to watch what has taken place all day. I agree with the other Canadian comments - if Obma doesn’t win - we would love to have him in our county.

Olga
Ontario

Annie, Atlanta   April 14th, 2008 4:07 pm ET

Jack,

My interest is intense. The first time I saw Ralph Reed on tv years ago, the hair on the back of my neck stood up. If these people got powerful enough, we were in trouble. Now, for the first time since then, I have hope that “we the people” finally came to our senses.

Mabel Georgia   April 14th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

This is the most interesting Election in my lifetime. The non issue becomes an issue and the graft that is done goes away with the next news headline. We never visit the storyline for any length of time.
We have people making excuses for why they do not like the Black guy. Saturday Night Live makes fun of them all.
There is never a dull moment. I read a guy’s comment that Obama is an elitist, not because of money but because of a state of mind he has!
I guess I better change my state of mind.For the first time a once poor single parent mixed black/white child is considered an Elitist? This is really interesting. It has become somewhat hilarious! I wonder will he be able to get a cab in New York?

JeninTexas   April 14th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

I have voted since I became of age. I always vote but this year it seems to be really important. We need a change. We have had men and we have seen what they do and sometimes what they failed to do. There have been some great presidents and there have been a few that weren’t so great. But we have never had a women. We need a change in the way Washington is handle. Go Hill

RC Lendz Philadelphia, PA   April 14th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

At the age of 28, this is only the third Presidential election I have had the privilege to vote in. After the blunder in 2000 and the weak democratic Presidential candidate in 2004, this is a very important election to me, so I have been paying close attention.

Edna, Sugarland, Tx   April 14th, 2008 4:09 pm ET

Jack, for a person born outside of the US, I was proud to vote for the first time in my life in the primaries. I’ve been so addicted to the election news so much so that as soon as I get home from work, my kids turn their games off and flip the channel to CNN. I’m dying to watch a debate between Obama and McCain. I bet Sen McCain will not measure up. Apart from the war in Iraq, he’ll not be able to debate on any other issues facing Americans.

tim   April 14th, 2008 4:10 pm ET

i hope my vote will keep the beer drinking, bullet dodging and pantsuit wearing princess out of the most important office in the world.things are bad enough as it is.

Geri Britt   April 14th, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Well Jack, I am fascinated by the 2007-2008 campaign because Obama is a new face in town, he adds a new twist to the same old rhetoric, which is rather refreshing in itself. Plus I enjoy CNN’s coverage of this election, including you Jack. But! The only thing I can tell that’s different from these Senators standing on the steps of the Capitol building and the Senators standing on the steps of the Forum in Rome 2000 years ago, is the microphone and TV cameras in front of their faces. You would have thought that after two millineums they would have burned the same old speeches, or at least fired or hung the speech writer by now. As far as I can tell there isn’t much difference between Nero and our last three presidents, or whomever becomes the president elect.

Ed   April 14th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

Now we are see Obama in a true light. 1st was his wifes comments, and then came Rev Wright, now this. When is America going to open thier eyes to this person and tell him to go to hell?

clinton   April 14th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

I have protested the clinton’s since i was 12 years old so i don’t think we will not separate ourselves from polotics.

roger dowdle lockhart, tx   April 14th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

I am a baby boomer, was raised in a democratic family (who would have chosen charles mansion over mother Theresa if he ran as a dem.), and I could never understand why they chose any party. I started paying attention to politics in the Kennedy/Nixon campaigns. Since then, this is the first election, with the possible exception of Perot, where I haven’t heard “I voted for X because he was the lesser of two evils. McCzin is thee typical Rep., Hrc is the typical Dem. and Obama represents a change to change politics aswe know it. McCain is clueless as far as foreign affairs and the economy are considered, and HC has lied so many times you can’t believe anything she says. As far as the question of “are voters bitter”, the answer would have to be found in the record turnouts that Obama has triggered. If it was just McCain and HRC, the turn out would probably not even be as high as the last two elections.

Martha Brooks   April 14th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Like night from day, Jack! This time we have a real voice and a real choice. In the bad old days, it was two white guys cut from the same time-honored political cloth toting the same baggage. What’s happening now we just LOVE!
Martha
Rew, PA

Ted   April 14th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

Jack, Obama made an estute observation that there are people who are frustrated and feel abandoded by their government. Hillary’s (and McCain’s) ingnorantly equating all gun ownership to responsible hunters is, at best, absurd. If she really believes that only responsible hunters own guns, she might want to ask Bill exactly what the FBI was doing at Ruby Ridge, Idaho.
If Hillary (and McCain) can’t see that just because these “bitter” people exist does not mean that Obama feels that all gun owners, or all people in small towns, are bitter, then maybe they are unable to recognize the complexities in a way we need a president to be able to do.

diane (mississippi   April 14th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

I always said my vote did not count, but for the first time in my 38years of voting I feel my vote counts and I will be able to reach my country’s leader and get a real answer from someone who has not yet been “Washington corrupted”. Change God knows is what we need right.

Will   April 14th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

I’m down here in Texas and I’m bitter. I’m bitter over the fact that we have a notorious liar runner for president who chronically misspeaks with impunity. But when the other tells us the truth we castigate him. Old Jack is right, ‘we can’t handle the truth.’

Ken, yes bitter in Ohio   April 14th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Jack, after enduring and witnessing the past 7 1/2 years of Bush’s systematic demolition of this country, always voting the best qualifed candidate, but never actively engaged in any candidate’s campaign. This country needs the blunt trama force of Barack Obama’s “uncomfortable” truths about our country’s general health. Yes, I am “bitter”, but more importantly I am engaged, and feeling much better knowing we have a candidate that “gets” it. Oh, by the way, thanks for asking Jack.

BJL   April 14th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

I would like to know? what did Clinton mean when she was saying
the big speaches and the big crowds about Obama.
She was talking about some of the American People that attended
his ralley. so she can’t talk about Obama making a mistake and if
I am not mistakeing I though I herd her say the REAL Mens will vote
for her. in one of her speaches.

Brenda from Mass.   April 14th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

This one is far more important. We stand on the edge of something big or someone who feels she is entitled to be the next leader. I only hope that the b**ch loses PA. so she will GO AWAY!!

Jordan, Karla   April 14th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

No, the poeple who want to vote for Obama will vote for him anyway and the same for Clinton. Its the media who keeps blowing these stories up over and over again. Clinton needs to let it go as well and have the faith that she say she has to win…or did she Miss speak that too!

Karla
Mansfield, Ohio

James Huffman   April 14th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Hi Jack,
Although I’ve always been interested in elections, this is the one that has made my whole family want to talk about politics. They are tired of hypocrisy - it is time for walk and talk to match. So far, Obama has our trust more than the others. He admits his mistakes and doesn’t try to continually tear down his opponents. In other words, he doesn’t “bear false witness”!
You’re doing great, Jack. Maybe it won’t stay ugly out there!
Jim

Sonia From Georgia   April 14th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

This is the first time in my adult life that I have been so excited about politics. The only thing that so disappointing this time around is how the media is blowing up and making everything the candidates say such a big deal. I do not find what Obama said offensive - I am from a small town in Georgia & yes, we are frustrated and feel that the gov. have forgot about us & only care about themselves. What Obama has said is a good thing because it’s finally getting the attention of the big dogs in Washington. Go Obama - we love you and deserve to be the demo. nominee.

Ruby Coria, LA. CA.   April 14th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Jack, after Bush who would be ready to vote?., four years ago everyone just gave up (we had Kerry) oh lord., this year we have ??? no one, but it’s better then Bush.

Patricia Robledo   April 14th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Jack, it doesn’t compare. I had never even heard of a Super delagate until this election. I didn’t watch CNN 24/7 like I do now. I mean, it’s changed my lifestyle, at least temporarily. The garden will just have to wait.
If Obama doesn’t win, at least I can thank him for getting me interested in the political process of picking a President.
God Bless him!

Mary Janssen   April 14th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

I woke up when the Supreme Court stopped the count in Florida in 2000. I watch news reports, read newspapers, online blogs, etc. to educate myself. No longer will I trust what our president or congressmen/women say.

And just to let you know, I was not offended by what Senator Obama said. He was right. He was being honest. Good lord, I am so sick and tired of the way our government officials treat us like we’re morons. I use to be a Hillary supporter, but am disappointed and angered by her “Karl Rove” tactics. I hope Senator Obama