<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama under scrutiny?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/</link>
	<description>Tell Jack how you really feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Hussein , Houston,TX</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120344</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hussein , Houston,TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120344</guid>
		<description>Obama on Scrutiny , For What?  Bill Maher showed Obama with his hands on his Crouth, waving his Genitals at the American Flag!  Big deal, &quot;Take This Gringos&quot;; Blacks were not included in the Constitution; Don&#039;t need ot apply! But, VOTE for ME and see the changes. Fried Chicken and Shu Fly Pie in every Household. Guaranteed !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama on Scrutiny , For What?  Bill Maher showed Obama with his hands on his Crouth, waving his Genitals at the American Flag!  Big deal, &#034;Take This Gringos&#034;; Blacks were not included in the Constitution; Don&#039;t need ot apply! But, VOTE for ME and see the changes. Fried Chicken and Shu Fly Pie in every Household. Guaranteed !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayman</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120345</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120345</guid>
		<description>It is so sad to see hope die out becuase of personal issues, Let us be frank with eachother no one in washington IS CLEAN but you know what we need the hope we need to know that our commander is well beyound hope and Barak presents that hope that keeps people going and let us not forget everyone voted for regan based on his message of hope. If barak Obama drops out i will be voting for Mccain at least he does not decive people as much as the Clintons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so sad to see hope die out becuase of personal issues, Let us be frank with eachother no one in washington IS CLEAN but you know what we need the hope we need to know that our commander is well beyound hope and Barak presents that hope that keeps people going and let us not forget everyone voted for regan based on his message of hope. If barak Obama drops out i will be voting for Mccain at least he does not decive people as much as the Clintons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan H. in columbus</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120333</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan H. in columbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120333</guid>
		<description>This one is a softball.  It is a combination of 2 things.  The first is 8 years of Bush / Cheney incompetency.  The second is the youth surge for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is a softball.  It is a combination of 2 things.  The first is 8 years of Bush / Cheney incompetency.  The second is the youth surge for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie, GA</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120332</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120332</guid>
		<description>No effect.  Obama is true to his words.  Please America give the man some credit for being an ivey league graduate.  Isn&#039;t it suspicious that Hillary Clinton&#039;s team is providing all of this information at the last minute.  Give him the benefit of the doubt.  What if Obama&#039;s team decided to play dirty and contact Monica Lewinsky.  I&#039;m sure there&#039;s more to her story as to why she just disappeared. Then Hillary would be beaten at  her own game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No effect.  Obama is true to his words.  Please America give the man some credit for being an ivey league graduate.  Isn&#039;t it suspicious that Hillary Clinton&#039;s team is providing all of this information at the last minute.  Give him the benefit of the doubt.  What if Obama&#039;s team decided to play dirty and contact Monica Lewinsky.  I&#039;m sure there&#039;s more to her story as to why she just disappeared. Then Hillary would be beaten at  her own game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TO</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120316</link>
		<dc:creator>TO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120316</guid>
		<description>How much will this hurt his chance? Better ask Kerry, Richardson, or Dean. Ask them why they want Hillary out that early?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much will this hurt his chance? Better ask Kerry, Richardson, or Dean. Ask them why they want Hillary out that early?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan, Champaign IL</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120313</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan, Champaign IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120313</guid>
		<description>More than it should have, Jack.  Unfortunately, the news has obsessed over involvement that is not even suggested by the case.  It&#039;s irresponsible journalism if you ask me, and undermines real issues at a critical time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than it should have, Jack.  Unfortunately, the news has obsessed over involvement that is not even suggested by the case.  It&#039;s irresponsible journalism if you ask me, and undermines real issues at a critical time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Smith</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120295</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120295</guid>
		<description>Rough &amp; tumble Chicago have determined there&#039;s nothing there, but Hillary keeps trying.Hopefully it won&#039;t do as much damage as she hopes in the primary, but will give republicans fuel in the general.

Canada has apoligised about nafta. Sad part not everyone bothers to check facts. Can only hope her kitchen sink strategy helps sink her!

BJ     Seminole, FL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rough &amp; tumble Chicago have determined there&#039;s nothing there, but Hillary keeps trying.Hopefully it won&#039;t do as much damage as she hopes in the primary, but will give republicans fuel in the general.</p>
<p>Canada has apoligised about nafta. Sad part not everyone bothers to check facts. Can only hope her kitchen sink strategy helps sink her!</p>
<p>BJ     Seminole, FL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigi in Alabama</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigi in Alabama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120288</guid>
		<description>It probably won&#039;t hurt him too much in today&#039;s primaries but if he cannot answer it to suit the Republicans, they&#039;ll have a hayday with him IF he is the democratic nominee in the general election.  He won&#039;t be able to grin and say the Clinton&#039;s are at it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably won&#039;t hurt him too much in today&#039;s primaries but if he cannot answer it to suit the Republicans, they&#039;ll have a hayday with him IF he is the democratic nominee in the general election.  He won&#039;t be able to grin and say the Clinton&#039;s are at it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn W., New York</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120270</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn W., New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120270</guid>
		<description>I think that it will hurt him very much because he runs on a theme of:
transperity and new style politics. 
when this kind of stuff comes up it shows that he cannot run on that platform so if we have to choose between the 2, Hillary will be a lot better. I think the Nafta issue will hurt him even more because they denied the meeting and in fact it did happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it will hurt him very much because he runs on a theme of:<br />
transperity and new style politics.<br />
when this kind of stuff comes up it shows that he cannot run on that platform so if we have to choose between the 2, Hillary will be a lot better. I think the Nafta issue will hurt him even more because they denied the meeting and in fact it did happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion</title>
		<link>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120244</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/obama-under-scrutiny/#comment-120244</guid>
		<description>Jack,
    Yes, buying property from Rezco&#039;s wife was a bone-headed mistake given that Rezco was under a cloud of suspicion at the time.  It raised doubts in the publics&#039; mind only because of its inappropriateness.  In no way has Obama been accused of ILLEGAL dealings, however.  Also, he rightly gave the thousands from Rezco to charity.   Of course, we should see through the Clintons&#039; rabid desire to cast doubt on Obama&#039;s honesty. But I see no reason we should believe this was anything other than the bone-headed mistake Obama admitted.  
     As far as the Canadian meeting about NAFTA with an Obama campaign person is concerned, as long as the Canadian official contends the meeting was truly as Obama characterized it, I believe him.  It certainly seems to me, it would n&#039;t be in this Canadian official&#039;s best interest to lie.       Marion from Iowa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,<br />
    Yes, buying property from Rezco&#039;s wife was a bone-headed mistake given that Rezco was under a cloud of suspicion at the time.  It raised doubts in the publics&#039; mind only because of its inappropriateness.  In no way has Obama been accused of ILLEGAL dealings, however.  Also, he rightly gave the thousands from Rezco to charity.   Of course, we should see through the Clintons&#039; rabid desire to cast doubt on Obama&#039;s honesty. But I see no reason we should believe this was anything other than the bone-headed mistake Obama admitted.<br />
     As far as the Canadian meeting about NAFTA with an Obama campaign person is concerned, as long as the Canadian official contends the meeting was truly as Obama characterized it, I believe him.  It certainly seems to me, it would n&#039;t be in this Canadian official&#039;s best interest to lie.       Marion from Iowa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
