Of course not! To the contrary, in fact–it's among the media's most important jobs to keep the candidates honest, something few if any of them would do otherwise.

But it's also among the media's most important jobs to remain honest itself and to report the new fairly–something Fox News, and possibly other organisations including CNN, is obviously not doing in its efforts to ignore Ron Paul into oblivion.

While I respect the former president and the accomplishments of his years in the White House I sincerely believe that voters are somewhat confused on who the real candidate is and who,,s record of experience and accomplishment are being evaluated. Is this campaign being run on the success and experince of the Senator or the success and experience of the former President,s years in the White House.

All due respect to the Senator and her candidacy I do think that each and every voter needs to ask this question before going to the ballot box.

Think twice about how what you say because you're no different than them. You're human too and would want to win. If you can find someone that wouldn't be corrupted by politics within the first week of running, you better make them run for president.

It's all a game and the ones who have gotten this far are the ones who play dirty. They aren't going to stop.

Rather than providing accurate, realistic reporting the includes all candidates running for the presidency they provide disparate reporting many time trashing candidates on either sides, providing onesided views and unrealistic one liner healines to reach audiences giving a false or wrong impression of candidates.

The media needs to do a better job and provide the real news not the one that they want to public to hear or the one that is going to win more readership for them.

It should not be a corporate or stockholder earnings issue but reporting the "real" news with out exageration for the sake of information. The public deserves that and that alone.