CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HEADLINE NEWS



January 7, 2008
Posted: 05:57 PM ET

ALT TEXT

Barack Obama addressing citizens of New Hampshire (Photo Credit: AP)

FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:
Barack Obama told cheering supporters in New Hampshire today, “You’re the wave and I’m riding it.” Boy, is he ever. Polls now show him with a commanding lead over Hillary Clinton ahead of tomorrow’s primary.

Whether or not Obama ends up riding this wave all the way to the White House, it seems he will accomplish something extraordinary, and that is to leave an indelible mark on the age-old dialogue about race relations in this country.

Obama is black, but experts believe his win in Iowa, which is almost all white and rural, shattered what many people think about black Americans in national politics.

Conservative commentator George Will suggested that the two big losers are Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who Will says have an investment in the “traditional and… utterly exhausted narrative about race relations in the United States.” He says Americans are tired of so-called “identity politics”, where people are defined by things like their ethnicity and gender.

Another sign that Obama’s candidacy is something more: Fox News reports a lot of big-time black celebrities haven’t announced their support of Obama yeT, people like Spike Lee, Denzel Washington, Quincy Jones, BET Chairman and founder Robert Johnson, Motown founder Berry Gordy Jr., authors Maya Angelou and Toni Morrison, and rappers “Diddy” and “Jay Z.”

Here’s my question to you: How does Barack Obama’s success so far in the campaign change the debate about race in this country?

Interested to know which ones made it on air?

Ruby writes:
I’m a 61-year old African American woman who has seen the worst of America’s race relations. I did not support Obama at first because I thought his candidacy was sheer folly. But, after Iowa and maybe New Hampshire, I’m beginning to believe the America I learned about in school is finally here.

Essie from North Carolina writes:
I don’t think Obama’s race has been an issue at all. Color is not what comes to my mind when I see him. What I see is hope, change and opportunity.

Janice writes:
Great question! Finally someone talking about what Barack’s success really means! Yes, this is America and people of ALL races, religions, and gender have equal opportunity! The “Jesse Jackson” race card group needs to find something else to fuss about or maybe get a real job! Uncle Tom died a long time ago, good riddance and may he Rest In Peace!

C. writes:
People would like to believe race is no longer an issue in America but sadly, it still is. That said, I think the support for Obama from all races and both genders is promising! I think the support for Obama is telling of how much the country is in trouble and the fact that people are willing to put personal prejudices aside and vote for a candidate that they believe will do what’s best for the majority of middle class America.

Steven writes:
I haven’t really thought much about race, as it relates to the Obama candidacy. I’m a Clinton supporter. However, if getting him elected would mean pushing a racist rabble rouser like Al Sharpton deep into the oblivion he deserves, I might be persuaded to vote for him. It is refreshing to have a black man (okay, 1/2 black) on the national stage without blaming the rest of the world for all of black society’s problems.

Joanne in Boston writes:
Barack Obama has changed the debate about race this way: We are judging him by the content of his character, not the color of his skin.

Filed under: Barack Obama


D-Dog   January 7th, 2008 2:28 pm ET

I cannot believe race is still an issue in the 21st century, I thought we were past that, isn’t the major issue right now is World War 3 going on in the Middle East. Talk about are priorities being out of wack.

Brian Nancoo - Trinidad   January 7th, 2008 2:30 pm ET

He’s not going to improve race relations now,people will think the same thoughts about race that they now have.He can have a profound impact on future race relations based on his level of success in two phases.The first phase will be to win the presidency.If he gets the nomination,which it seems likely now,and loses to the Republicans,it will be blamed on race and will damage race relations.If he wins the presidency and does not deliver on his promises,this will also be blamed on race and also damage race relations.This will be Jackie Robinson all over again,with one exception,Senator Obama will have every available hand ready to help him succeed - Congress,Wall Street etc.Jackie Robinson had the opposite.Time will tell,time always tells….

Terry   January 7th, 2008 3:01 pm ET

Jack
I believe we are beyond the race card, there are more important issues in this election to deal with we dont need to be looking at race or religion, lets pick the best person who can get us out of this mess.

Rich, Fairview Texas   January 7th, 2008 3:06 pm ET

I don’t think it has changed anything one way or the other. This election is not about race or sex and never was. People that were and are racists and sexists will still be racists and sexists after it is over. America has come a long way since March 1866 when everyone but the American Indian got the right to vote and August of 1920 when Women were given that same right. When people vote in the 2008 election they will not be looking at skin color or sex they will be looking at capability and believability and knowledge and skill. This is no different then a patient being operated on by a doctor. It does not matter that the doctor wears a dress or what color they are they only need to be able to perform the operation successfully while preserving the dignity and the health of the patient. The candidate that possesses those skills will be the next president.

Jonathan   January 7th, 2008 3:07 pm ET

The debate is disappearing because most young people have grown up being taught that there really is no fundamental differences between people that have different amounts of skin pigmentation.

Scott   January 7th, 2008 3:15 pm ET

can you believe it jack? finally the nation relizes there is but one race,
the human race. we all bleed red. the sun tone of our skin dosen’t matter any more. were one AMERICA, and were mad as hell, we will make a statement
in this election. by the way, a woman at the helm isn’t a bad idea either.
bowling green, mo.

Larry from MO.   January 7th, 2008 3:16 pm ET

Jack,

Barack Obama does not know what the word race means. He does not know what a Republican or Democrat is. He does know what an American is. He will unite all Americans and solve the domestic and international problems by words like unity, peace, diplomacy. Race is not a word in the heart of Americans. Health care, gas prices, jobs, housing and peace are things that Barack Obama will address as President of the United States.

Patricia   January 7th, 2008 3:21 pm ET

Sen. Obama’s success is due to the fact that he took his education & made it work for him. He used what our system offered him & with that he brought hope to those who believe the system won’t work for them. Did race have anything to do with that? Yes.

Adekunle Oladide   January 7th, 2008 3:43 pm ET

I does serve as an indicator of better things to come, at least on the surface. The landscape is progress and Barrack is wheeling it. However it ain’t over yet, only day-dreamers will think that!

vicki   January 7th, 2008 3:47 pm ET

Jack,
Why does Barrack Obama claim to be black, when he is half white and half black. Isn’t he denying the white part of himself when he calls himself a black man?

Vicki Hopkins
Queen Creek, Arizona

Linda   January 7th, 2008 3:54 pm ET

I grew up in NY, in the 60s, so my feelings about race are probably much more broad minded than those of someone who is older. I personally don’t care what color someone is as long as he or she can get the job done. Senator Obama’s success, so far, is a very good indication of the fact that most people in the US are sick and tired of the status quo and of this country being governed by politicians whose only interests are in themselves and the special interest groups. And, I am thrilled to see the younger Americans showing up in droves to express their opinions! We have to take our country back!

C. Farrell, Houston, Tx   January 7th, 2008 4:00 pm ET

I believe Barack’s success so far in this campaign doesn’t change the debate about race it’s the young people of all races who are making the change.

Guy   January 7th, 2008 4:03 pm ET

I am on the same page as George Will. I’m sure that Revs’ Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton would be dissapointed to see Mr Obama succeed…….Perhaps that is why they have not publicly endorsed him yet. Back to [a real job] the church pulpit fellas!

Richard Sternagel   January 7th, 2008 4:07 pm ET

Jack, I think Senator Obama success indicates that race is not the sole factor in running for President and that stereotypes be they black or white are moderating in the country. Thank God for that!

Marie K. Pollick   January 7th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Right on Jack. I gree with you and think Obama is just what this faltering country needs at this moment. “maire” pollick.

Clara Hipp   January 7th, 2008 4:18 pm ET

You really do hate Hillary don’t you, Jack? It is truly a diffucult decision we have to make. What you saw as an angry outburst I saw as real passion and commitment. Yes, Obama MIGHT really bring some kind of change, but that was the reasoning of many when George Bush promised to “change Washington”.

As sincere as I believe both Obama and Edwards are, I do not think either of them realize just how diffucult (if not impossible) REAL change will be. At least in Hillary we know what we’re getting.

John   January 7th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

Hillary’s anger is probably going to help her - she is angry like many Americans that we’re stuck with a useless executive branch. Unlike most Americans she’s qualified, ready, and able to fix it - so letting some anger show when that opportunity starts slipping away is justified.

Rob   January 7th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

I believe Barack Obama could be the next JFK of today. JFK was a young president & a breath of fresh air who opposed a very unpopular war (sound familiar?) He brought about change, connected with the people & turned the status-quo of Washington on it’s ear. Americans loved JFK & it didn’t matter if his skin was white, black, purple or green. It’s the person inside that counts & the same goes for Obama.

Greg from PA   January 7th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

Barack’s success is a sign that Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream is within our reach. It means that hope for a better tomorrow is shared by all Americans. It means that America is ready to set aside our differences and work together to see this great nation through the troubled times we now face and to make the world a better place for all.

Susan Norris   January 7th, 2008 4:21 pm ET

Jack, Why does the media continue to insist that the Clinton campaign is on the rocks and yet you never mention a word about Rudy?
Before the Iowa Caucus, both Clinton and Rudy were the national front runners and yet Rudy didn’t even come close to winning in Iowa and he is not expected to place in the top tier in New Hampshire. So why isn’t he being talked about at all? Good or bad.
You continously prove to me by helping the Obama campaign that you are either a member of the Republican oil machine or just a plain old fashioned sexist. We all know the Republicans cannot wait to nuke this man of Muslim Heritage.
And by the way, why are all the top anchors on CNN men?
I will continue to support the best candidate in the race that is not a member of the status quo which consists entirely of men.
I will vote for Hillary. I want real change.
America consists of 52 percent women—–we do count and we are rooting for Hillary.
I’d bet good money that in your very own newsroom, the women are paid tremendously less than the men.
Go Hillary.

-30-   January 7th, 2008 4:22 pm ET

No one has played the race card faster or more often than Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. I, for one, am fed up with the gesticulating, self-destructive “angry black man” persona. Obama is showing America a better way forward.

Jenny from New York   January 7th, 2008 4:23 pm ET

The beautiful thing about Obama’s candidacy is that it transcends race and race isn’t an issue. He’s not running as a “Black candidate.” He’s running as the BEST candidate to unite the country.

BR-New York City   January 7th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

Jack,

I guess we are finally seeing the fruits of desegregation. As the old saying goes, “For the young shall lead us.”

Tim from PA   January 7th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

It changes it greatly. Despite being a registered Republican, I truly think he is probably the closest we will come to a candidate who is well educated, well spoken and does really care about all Americans in this group of Candidates. What he lacks in experience he makes up in with his education and his common sense thought process.

Eric from Memphis, TN   January 7th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

This is a man who everyone can get behind, regardless of race. Without the rhetoric that Sharpton and Jackson often tout, Sen. Obama is getting his message through to everyone. As a life-long republican, I look forward to supporting this man of change who will make a long-term difference for the United States.

Susan Norris   January 7th, 2008 4:25 pm ET

It’s clear from the attacks against Hillary that sexism abounds in this country.
The fact that people would prefer to support Obama, a man of Muslim heritage, as opposed to Hillary just shows me that women are still embryos, with a long, long way to go unless they wake up and stop voting for the status quo—-men.
Hillary has forgotten more about how to run this country than all the boys know today.

Christine from California   January 7th, 2008 4:27 pm ET

It shows that at least some of America is color blind, as it should be. But, hopefully, the Democrats can round up Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and put duct tape over their mouths so they don’t ruin things for Obama.

Stephen D. from IA   January 7th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Being an Iowan Democrat I feel the Caucus last week made a statement about the wave of change going through the country. Obama is the fresh breathe that the government needs and the country sees that they see that here is finally a politician we can trust and nothing can be more exciting.

Mark   January 7th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

it’s shown what most of us have already known - that what matters more than race is answers and he’s got them. No blame, no rhetoric, no “schtick”, just a clear vision that is easily relatable by any American and a positive message of hope and inclusiveness that doesn’t “blame” anyone but simply asks that we all pitch in to get something done. Too many previous public black leaders have been too heavy on blame, lectures, and empty rhetoric regarding white america’s perception of black america and how to best react to that. Obama has turned the page and made it clear not just to blacks but to America that it’s up to us to decide the future - all of us. And his job, one he’s doing well so far, is giving us the courage to make it happen.

Gino   January 7th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Is Senator Obama changing the debate about race in the United States? By race, I mean the biological differentiation of colours of the people who make up the United States, something that is a scientific fact, as a matter of fact on the Today Show this morning; a man whose skin is blue was interviewed! Yep, a “blue skinned” American! To me it does not matter whether you are of one colour or another, you still are a human being, what matters if whether you are a member of the society we have and do function in our society for the good of our country, and eventually the world. I know there has been and there still is a lot of differentiation between the various people in our society, actually not only between black, Native Americans, whites, Orientals… it is unfortunate… but all members of this society of ours have a brain, and they can think for themselves when it comes to voting and other important things in life. Hopefully voters will not be influenced by the biological race they fall into, but will vote for the person they think will do best for our society as a whole, somebody who will kick all the special interests out of the political circle… and when the present Senators and Congress members are up for election and reelection, voters will look at their record and see whom these people represent before electing or reelecting them! American need to clean house and this can only be done by voters who put aside race differentiation, and do not think that they belong to one party or another, but that think that they are part of an American society! Race should not play any part in politics and in other places, are we human beings or not, are we Americans or not? That is the question! Vote for the good of the country, not for the good of a segment of our society!

Gayle Cates   January 7th, 2008 4:28 pm ET

Obama and all of the candidates talk in generalities. “Lift the people up”. What does that mean?

Watch the press conference of the Oklahoma University and see all of the problems and how severe they are. Your reporters are just having a good time. .Ask them specific questions about specific problems and get specific answers.

I have never heard so much talk with so little substance.

Julienne   January 7th, 2008 4:29 pm ET

The advantage Barack Obama has is that he doesn’t “look” black, He is young and slim and tall and charismatic. I hope he can change race relations, but I look at what he’s done so far, and am not impressed. He is too much sound and ego, and not enough substance yet.

Pat   January 7th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

Get behind him or get out of the way. From an old white female Democrat in Wyoming.

Frank Cavestani   January 7th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

I heard about a debate on race in the country, mostly it came from the news and media pundits like yourself. Personally I never heard any, at work or in my life. I would always have voted for the person and what he stood for not his race or religion. So I feel Obama being a contender is not even so surprising. I do feel he is not ready to be president at this early point in his career. It is bad enough we have an arrogant youthful foolish President now.

Ken KS   January 7th, 2008 4:32 pm ET

Barak Obama is ahead and it appears that everyone projects him and possibly John McCain in the Election of 2008. Clinton, Edwards, Romney and Thompson aren’t out of it yet. As for Obama being black (half black, half white), I hope the O.j. Simpson Trial and Johnny Cochran’s race card strategy doesn’t raise its ugly head in this election. Reserve that for the likes of Karl Rove. Just like my gereration, JFK was a candidate and president who gave us hope. After his death, this nation hasn’t been the same. Maybe Obama, if he actually does win the presidency, he’ll bring back that hope we lost in 1963. We will have to wait and see.

Monica in CA   January 7th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

What about his race,It’s the issues that matter. He could be purple for all I care. When I go to the grocery store and spend $2 for a loaf of bread , $ 3.99 for a gallon of milk and $3.26 for a gallon of gas, the only color that matters is GREEN. He has my support based on those issues not his color. By the way I can hardly buy anything to go along with my bread and gas, any suggestions?

Barbara   January 7th, 2008 4:34 pm ET

I think Barack Obama represents HOPE to a lot of disenfranchised Americans. I have not felt this way since - dare I say it - John F. Kennedy was running for President. Barack is young, true, but so was Kennedy when he ran for president. They both have that illusive charisma, that msyterious appeal that when they start speaking, you have to ignore everything else around you and listen attentively. I find myself thinking the perhaps under his leadership, America can regain the optimism and respect from the rest of the world, like it used to have. I used to be proud to be an American, but recently, I am ashamed for what America has stood for. We have lost our way, and have been led into the Dark Side. Obama has The Force with him, and I hope the rest of America realizes it.

Kingwood, Texas

pam graves   January 7th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

It doesn’t change America’s idea regarding race. We have been ready for a black or female for quite some time. My question back to you is, why is the media so “easy” on Senator Obama? We voters have real questions for him. Is it true he does not salute the flag? Is it true if elected he will be sworn in on the Koran? Is it true he just recently converted and joined a Christian church? This stuff is all over the internet and being sent to millions, and yet not one of you has asked these questions. If they are not true, that needs to be know by all voters. If it is true, we also deserve to know that. Do you r jobs. Stop pandering and ask the hard questions.

dan   January 7th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

BULL-PUDD”N as long as theres a planet nothing going to change race relations.but if you’re white your alright, [if your brown you get to stick around.]here that illegals. [if you're black get back.] come on lets get real.and i’am black.and i don’t see it jack.

Marc Lichtenstein   January 7th, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Jack–the reason why Obama can change race relations is not because he is black. It is because he is also white. Everyone forgets that his mother was white because of his skin color, which is at the heart of why race is such a polarizing and destructive issue in America. Barack Obama can change race relations because he is the living embodiment (literally) of what is possible when race ceases to be a divisive issue.

mike mcgonigle   January 7th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

Jack, I am a 65 year old irish american, who used to have vehement arguments with my dad, about wilt chamberlain and oscar robertson being the best basketball players; i thought so, he disagreed. it wasn’t til i was much older that i realized that we weren’t talking about the same thing. who knows yet whether most americans will go into the booth, and vote for the best candidate, regardless
of color or gender? i hope they will, but, as with my dad, i’m not sure.
p.s. swap places with blitzer, please!

Tom Bulger   January 7th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

What change? WE Irish have always been up against it. That’s why God made us lucky. For instance, the date of the New Hampshire primary is a new moon It’s also the first eight of 2008, a lucky number according to the Chinese (can a billion people be wrong?)

Obama’s astrological sign is the lion. His Kearney Irish ancestry coat of arms is three standing lions. Kearney (Victorious), are Dalcassian clan, famous for the leaders Brian Boru, Conn of the Hundred Battles, and Finn MacCool. Young Fulmuth Kearney left County Clare to bequeath his descendant Barack the audacity of Hope and his Irish luck.

Irish eyes are smilin’, Jack, for good reason .

Robert   January 7th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

It’s simple Jack! Barack Obama doesn’t beat the world over the head over his race. He presents himself as a human being who cares about his country and its people - All of its people. The anger and hostility of black presidential candidates before him such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton no longer permeates the discussion of the issues. With Mr. Obama we get a reasoned airing of his positions. I don’t agree with him on everything, and I’m still planning on voting for Hillary Clinton, but Mr. Obama is truly a breath of fresh air.

Robert

Shirley Ross   January 7th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

I am a woman and there are times when tears will work for us, and there are times when they won’t. People (men) expect us to fold and get angry/emotional when we face obstacles, rejection, a bad day, etc. This is NOT what we need in a president. Can you imagine the horror if a male candidate, however passionate about the issue or whatever the circumstances, breaks down and resorts to tears? Wouldn’t the international community have a field day with this? (Can’t remember his name at the moment, but there was a guy sometime ago who let the tears flow, and he was almost railroaded out of town.)

Hillary is old school, status quo, and, despite her cool demeanor most of the time, does not demonstrate all the qualities needed to be effective.

jamie   January 7th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Did Oboma put his hand on the

bible when he took office.

Anonymous   January 7th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

I am currently deployed to the Middle East, as my fellow Sailors and I watch the campaign we seem to be confused on what America is standing for. How can someone as Obama be running for the Presidencies of the United States Of America and refuse to wear the flag of our nation on his shoulder, and give proper respect to the flag as to placing his hand over his heart during the pledge of Allegiance? The United States flag is the cloth of our nation and is who we are, and what we represent as our country. Our flag is what we the Arm Force die under, and fight for. Is there a reason as to why he refuses respect something so saccade?? What message is that sending to us over seas giving our life’s for freedom, when America’s own Presidencies campaign Obama refuses to wear what we represent?

Dave   January 7th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Jack Cafferty should get his facts straight. Obama is not black, nor does he claim to be. Yes, his father is from Kenya, but his mother is white. Obama is related to Dick Cheney.

So Obama has something in common with both sides of the race relations issue.

john   January 7th, 2008 4:41 pm ET

It doesn’t change a thing. Obama is a traditional black supremacist and racist. Obama is nothing more than a black David Duke. Listen and compare his speeches to black audiences and then to general public audiences. To general audiences he preaches passivity synonymous with the words of MLK and other like Rev Jackson, however to black only audiences he spreads an activist radical Huey Newton, Bobby Seale, Black Panther type message. Make no mistake Obama has been a black activist organizer since his youth and if anything else very accomplished at it. It is time to change the debate about race in this country but first we must remove race from politics. Compare and contrast Obama’s message with that of Alan Keyes and decide for yourself

fabooj   January 7th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

Man, I can’t wait for you boomers to be put out to pasture so my generation (I’m 35) and the ones beyond me can get on with the business of talking about anything but the color of someone’s skin.

donna mclaughlin   January 7th, 2008 4:43 pm ET

Of course race is still an issue
The beauty of Barak is he is transcending it

jack76   January 7th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

jacki, you ask if barack is denying his white heritage. you do know of course, that most black americans have white blood in them, right? and though obama is not a descendant of american slavery (and rape by white masters) he does share a similar biracial heritage.

i wonder if you question shaquile o’neal for denying his irish heritage.

jack76   January 7th, 2008 4:46 pm ET

also, maya angelou has already endorsed hillary clinton.

Mark in Iowa   January 7th, 2008 4:49 pm ET

A debate assumes at least two sides presenting evidence and trying to persuade the others of the ‘rightness’ of its position. Debate diminishes the role of listening while enhancing the role of speaking. In that, race relations in the US are so problematic in part, because there is little heard but strident voices asserting “Racism!” at every turn, or “Reverse racism!” at every advance. Obama has brought forward the opportunity for the diverse communities of the US to talk about race without it being about ‘my gain’ or ‘my loss’, and instead is about ‘our path.’

He doesn’t suggest there are not racial issues lingering here in the US. He rather calls the country to task to come forward together, regardless of identity - political, religious, or ethnicity - and work to build the 21st century America. No white person could do this, because they would speak from a position of historical privilege, and to look forward without addressing imbalance is disingenuous from the community of privilege, no matter how sincere. But to have a voice of color lift a redemptive political message, gives permission to us all to focus foremost on the future and its needs, as a means of addressing the past. His redemptive call is to an inclusive ‘us’…not to a ‘we or they’.

Thursday night, on a frigid night in Iowa, one could hear across these frozen fields of corn and bean…history being made.

robert   January 7th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Opra no go girl
Opra open a school for young select women for the pupuse of empowering them to make change in their country because she think that women with more power and knowledge will bring change for them . But back home she support a men so I think that deep down its more about gender then race. So no go girl

Mati   January 7th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

I never thought race or gender should be considered issues in 21st century. However, what I see now in this campaign is:

1. An African American candidate who acts as a left-wing politician and uses big words (kind of socialist demagogy) to attract the crowds, who didn’t offer much substance to the presidential race but diverted the focus from content to form in a time when America needs desperately action. I don’t trust his approach.

2. A White American woman who speaks of hard work, shows realism in understanding the issues, has a clear sense about what action means and has centrist positions that are very helpful in having things done. This is a pragmatic woman who already delivered change and solutions to many problems. I resonate with her.

I don’t want to be stereotyping here, but what does the above description tell us about ‘race in this country’? Hillary Clinton is promoting an ethics of work that is rooted in the American culture and speaks to the American Dream, while Obama has embraced some failing ideology that many countries in Europe and across the world have already repudiated. None is coming with anything new honestly, but I kind of prefer Clinton’s. So I am talking about the values promoted by candidates, and race, color, gender shouldn’t matter. What do Americans choose?

Sushma   January 7th, 2008 4:52 pm ET

I believe it’s has little to do with race and more with quality of the candidate. Given, Iowa is a white, rural state but, it boils down to integrity. Obama’s success in Iowa just goes to show that substance is more important than color and race. People are finally realizing that we’re all human beings and segregation is not the way towards progress.

Brian   January 7th, 2008 4:53 pm ET

I’m from the deep south and in my youth could never have imagined a non-caucasian president. However, Obama has a refreshing honesty about him and I would definitely support Obama IF Ron Paul is not in the general election. The reason? Change–REAL change! Change from the same old Washington Change from the ‘establishment’ candidate ideas! If Hillary is elected, change is probably all we will have left in our pocket.

Greg H   January 7th, 2008 4:54 pm ET

While you make good points about race in this election. I think you folks are missing the real story here. Which is everyone is sick and tired of our elected officials representing the special (coporate) interest at the expense of the American People. The so called Obama phoenomenom is simply voter backlash (we want the bums out!)
As far as Hillary Clinton is concerned, she would have a better chance if she divorced Bill. No one wants to give him another opportunity to defile the Oval Office again. When she speaks of her 35 years experience and hitting the ground running. She offers no evidence of this so called experience and we can only assume that that it is Bill and his team that will be hitting the ground running.

Keep up the great work.

jane stockton   January 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Look Jack, maybe you’ve missed something glaringly obvious to many women from the onset of this Democratic campaign for President and that are the misogynists having a field day when it comes to Hillary. From the political pundits to her opponents, and even her own party members, there has been a subtle to now an all out assault on this woman Obama has yet to detail one of his so called changes and perhaps it would be wise for those frothing at the mouth with such accolades for this vague political figure to actually ASK him for details and then Americans might actually be able to distinguish fact from fantasy. THIS is not the time for dreamers…this is the moment our nation must begin to grow up and face reality. Hillary may not be fuzzy and warm but she has the experience, intelligence and and insights to lead our nation back to greatness.. A pragmatist may never warm our hearts, but a dreamer in a time that demands a complete grasp of reality, will inject our hearts and minds with false hope. Our nation needs to grow up and I hope it’s not too late.

Justin from Grand Rapids, MI   January 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

Barack Obama has done and will do a lot in terms of breaking down racial barriers as his candidacy and career continues, but the fact that you are even having this discussion shows just how far we stil have to go. I for one, am very excited to see where he takes us.

Justin Godley

Roberta   January 7th, 2008 4:56 pm ET

George Will is right. The era is long past when overt segregation and discrimination were the norm anywhere in this country, including the south. Most white Americans grew up without a sense of race-based entitlement, so they react favorably to persons who display intelligence and ambition regardless of skin color. Obama demonstrates that Sharpton and Jackson’s claim that things haven’t changed, and persons of color cannot succeed because “whitie” holds them back is nothing more than self-serving hogwash.

DAK   January 7th, 2008 4:57 pm ET

I believe race was NEVER an issue for most of us, Jack, just as the religion of Romney never was. But what is an issue is the use of the “change” slogan when many are offering the “same old”. Many of these candidates have been the Washington establishment (and some even sound like George Bush), have voted on issues not in the best interest of America, have made many promises not kept, and most of all, still believe that illegal immigrants should be given AMNESTY. Change?? Come on, Jack! Why should we believe them now??

Mary   January 7th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

It doesn’t change the debate, race is, and always will be an issue for those who need a crutch.

Barrack is highly educated, eloquent, and has seized the moment. The younger generation does not judge by race, we judge on merit. Barrack speaks to those of us who have a more global view and need a leader to help us navigate into the 21st century, we can’t use passe 19th century ideologies to suceed in the 21st.

Move with the times.

Ardith   January 7th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

I was not going to vote for Hillary, as I am a liberal Democrat but after watching the no ethics press critisize her every move…I think I need to give her more serious consideration. Cafferty? What a jerk off!

suzie from atlanta, GA   January 7th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

Being black is no reason to vote for him or against him. He must be MORE than his color, and he is not. Of course we should be able to elect a President who is black, aisan, jewish, female, muslim, what ever, because the SOLE crietria for getting the job should be qualifications to lead. PERIOD. Nothing else should matter. But has he changed “race relations”?? No. The people who support him because he is black and for no other reason are doing a diservice to ALL OF US. And certainly this whole thing is a media invention. First Hillary was crowned the leader, by the media, then the race was turned into a 2 year test, by CNN first with all those debates, and all the others that followed, then Oprah got involved and suddenly Obama was THE one. HEY! This is not a ratings race. This is about our future!
Ok, so let’s get real here. WHO IS OBAMA? Well, as someone who worked for Bobby Kennedy, I can tell you who he is NOT: He is not Bobby.
Obama supported every funding bill for Iraq. He wants to nuke Iran or Pakistan if he thinks he “should”. He voted FOR the budget bill that EVERYONE else voted against. He was a “trial lawyer” for 9 years. For a Black man in a prominant law firm, earning a lot of money, he did very little for the poor, or the sick or elderly. Black, white, orange, who cares. He is NOT the one. Obama says his NH campaign chair is not a lobbyist for the GOV or for him, so he’s “fully vetted”? No Barack, he is a lobbyist for BIG PHARMA, and YOUR health plan leaves out 15 MILLION PEOPLE. Who is this guy? What do we even know about him? If you don’t like Hillary then vote for Edwards. But PLEASE do not support Obama. Start asking questions.

I fail to understand why he is so popular, and the only thing I can think of is the media. This is a great story for them, at our expense. Once again, the media will choose for us, and we will LOOSE. Why are they NOT following the Big Pharma link, or his real record? I WANT an experienced person in the top job. I am scared to death of Obama. And frankly, a woman is a huge change. She is not divisive in the Senate. Far from it.

Jessica L Westphalen   January 7th, 2008 5:00 pm ET

First of all it depends which poll you are looking at as to whose ahead. It is obovius that you favor Obama. Quit being so Bias. I think that it threatens your male egos to have a woman run for president. In the debate she had very right the to repley the Edwards and Obama and she Did Not come across as being angry that is your male interuprtations. She is a very sincere and she does want change and she knows how to get it.. I am sick and tried of hearing how great Obama is and the press treating him with kidd gloves he is not a rock star and certainly is no John F Kennedy or Bobby Kennedy. Also I haven’t made up my mind who I am going to vote for in our primary I just went all canidates to have a fair chance and for the press to refrain from snide remarks. Give all the candates.a fair chance.
Jessica L. Westphalen

Abm Habibullah   January 7th, 2008 5:01 pm ET

Senator Obama is a great man, a uniter, a deep thinker, a rational human being with deep knowledge, compassion and intelligent. We clearly need a change is Washington and all the people who have been talking about change, have not done a thing to make changes. I have not seen JFK, but I am proud to say that I have seen Barak Obama. We would like to see him as commander-in-chief who will rebuild the burned bridges across the world. Long live Sir Obama, may God continue to bless you and family.

Len Albuq New Mexico   January 7th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Jack I don’t think it will help race relations one ounce. If anything it will further divide the Country. Republicans do not like Black’s. Especially Black Democrats. That’s a FACT. They did’nt even like their own Black Republican , Collin Powell. They made him their PATSY. Barrack is a very educated, well spoken, well versed statesman and in my opinion would make a great President. Unfortunately, even in this day and age there is prejudice in race , gender, and religion.

Jack K., Fort Myers, FL   January 7th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

Mr. Obama seems to have a magicians knack for the elements of communication. Why is it then, I have misgivings about his sincerity? Could be he’s too perfect.

I don’t look at him as black. He seems to have transcended race and defies all ethnic stereotypes–which is probably why he has so little support from the blacks I know. I do wonder why I don’t observe more support from the black community at large–particularly the educational elite of the time (well except the Harvard Lawyers).

It seems since most don’t have all the resume for President (like Guliani and McCAin)–they are focusing attention away from their lessor abilities.

All the candidates have to use “change” as their mantra–even the GOP (except for Guliani and McCain).

I like to kick the tires and test drive–I wouldn’t by a car over the internet–and I’m sure not going to elect a President because of the polls and television commentary and especially due to the opinions of voters in Iowa or New Hampshire.

So I went to all the candidates agendas on their websites. Next, I read the heartfelt endorsements–and spoke to other Democrats about their thoughts on each candidate. After this exercise, I cannot say I really support Mr. Obama any more than I did before. He still seems too perfect–particularly compared to the opinions of some notable economists and other government leaders–whom I respect. So here’s how I rack-up my choices based on “genuine change agenda”, tracible track record supporting change, and legitamacy of the endorsements:

#1 Edwards (He’s on the record since 2000–no waffling ever)–comes across as most genuine and sincere. Tenancious and scruffy. But when if you think about the qualities necessary to go up against negative blitz (socialism, communism, unamericanism, and all the other isms) big business and the GOP will be shooting his way–that begins to look like a pretty good quality. We do seem to need John Wayne–not Gandhi to make the kind of change everyone expects to see coming.

#2 Obama (his record is sketchy on change) he avoided some tough votes in the senate by not showing up, which really smells of campaign strategy. He is a fence straddler–not a leader when it comes to change–at least by his record. His words seem sincere–but his avoidance of Iraq, Iran, and his comments on Pakistan deeply concern me. I’m a little puzzled why so many people I would expect to support him, particularly from the black community–do not.

#3 Clinton (She’s on the record–but ideas are canned and some aren’t wholly practical…too sweeping for someone with her experience to pull off). She has Bill Clinton’s endorsement–which to me is poison. I believe he should have resigned after Lewisnky. He was a bad example for other federal employees and the military–nobody would have been lenient with them. He’s baggage–we don’t need no matter how good her ideas are.

Andrew Scott   January 7th, 2008 5:09 pm ET

The only people who talk about these issues in terms of race, are those that want to keep us in the past in terms of thinking about race; al sharpton and jesse jackson included. I think alot of people have moved far beyond making everything about race, and Obama’s victory will finally put an end to the fanatical views that people on both sides of the issue wish to promote.

john   January 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Do you censor all the comments you don’t agree with

bene   January 7th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

where is carl rove? obama rapid ascension smells ‘rovish’. get hillary out of the way and the republican will be ‘roving’ into the white house jan ‘09. put obama up against mc cain or any of the other white males. is this not america? did you see the cnn story on obama’s grandma and relatives in kenya. america is sure ready to send air force one and secret service down to the kenyan farm. forget his stump speech of blue and red america, have we had any opinion on the violence of the other half of his family ancestral homeland.

Ray Mendoza   January 7th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

Are “we voting for Obama” because he’s black or because he’s the best candidate???

“Change that we can believe in” is a PR invention, where is the trail of changes that we can bite into…

Ray

stephanie   January 7th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

once again you got your facts wrong…Maya Angelou has endorsed Hillary Clinton and cut a radio ad for her…

No fool here   January 7th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

I saw on CNN a few minutes ago a report that said Obama is getting support from people who don’t know (or care) about his views on the issues. I can’t believe people are this stupid, apparently including YOU. Jimmy Carter was “nice”, but most people now say he wasn’t a good president. I love Jimmy Carter. I’m not particularly a Hillary fan, but she’s more qualified than Obama. I like Obama as a preacher, but not as president. It will be a terrible mistake we’ll have to live with for years! Well, the Bible says that Satan will appear in a charming manner. Lord help us!!!!!

No Fool Here

Vanessa A   January 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Obama has done a wonderful job of keeping the black vote yet handling the delicate balance of reminding white voters that he is in it for them too. Not only is he uniting red and blue states but also our longest struggle in American history. I admire the way he stays above it; while we get constant reminders from Hilary that she is change embodied as a ‘woman’. She’s pulling at straws.

Masu, from Fayetteville, North Carolina   January 7th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

Jack:

This ‘PROMISE’, meaning Senator Obama’s win in New Hampshire comes Tuesday, January 8th, and onward to the White House, will resonate throughout the world, that ‘Race Relations in America is about to enter a new season. A season of “Change’-where a true dialogue on ‘Black-on -Black Crime will take center stage in our community, to end this atmosphere of madness and despair.

Moreover, that Africa-Americans view [PREJUDICES] of others, primarily native Africans and other minorities coming in this country, will perhaps changed for the better. And that all of us will have a deeper sense of responsibility to citizenship and the tremendous opportunity to the ‘American Dream’.

Ken   January 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Yes changes the debate about race in this country. He’s not a racial Partisan like Sharpton or Jackson. I see both those men as RASCISTS. Remember Himey-town? Obama isn’t trying to advance black interests at the expense of other people. He wants positive change for everyone!!!

Hunter   January 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

I cant believe anyone would even CONSIDER Barack Obama as president! It just makes me sick. He wount even wear a us flag pin or put his hand on his heart during the pledge, This is usa if you dont like it DONT run for president. I cant even stand Barack Obama, We need Hillary People Wake up, Barack wouldnt even know where to start with the problems we have now!

Tawny   January 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

The only debate concerning “race” that Obama is concerned with is the “race” to the finish line!! HOW REFRESHING!!

Hamish Todd   January 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

I think it shows us something about how far down the wrong road America has driven. As to race relations, it’s my hope that Obama goes all the way, and I think then, we would begin to see a great deal of racial healing/equalization going on.

DP, Jacksonville, FL   January 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

Obama isn’t my candidate of choice, but a part of me hopes he gets the Democratic nomination just to silence all those ignorant fools who accuse middle-class whites of discrimination against African Americans everytime they fail to may eye contact in the supermarket. Sending Jackson and Sharpton to the unemployment line will simply be a nice bonus.

Ruby Elmore   January 7th, 2008 5:15 pm ET

I’m a 61-year old African American woman who has seen the worst of America’s race relations. I did not support Obama at first because I thought his candidacy was sheer folly. But, after Iowa and maybe New Hampshire, I’m beginning to believe the America I learned about in school is finally here. Maybe it’s time for we African-Americans to shift the “race narrative” somewhat. There are still problems and we as individuals may still suffer (ergo the man released from a Texas prison after spending 26-years in prison on false charges). But, maybe America is the place I truly love in my heart and desires.

AJ in Boulder   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

One of the many reasons that I’m supporting Barack Obama is because of the opportunity for him to inspire young blacks across this country to greatness. He will show them the way, but in a decent manner that is rarely seen in our politicians these days.

Cafferty's racist comments   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Why is Cafferty naming a few black individuals and asking why aren’t they endorsing Obama? Has he listed white individuals and asked them why haven’t they endorsed one of the white candidates? This is ridiculous and an insult to people’s intelligence, regardless of their color. Let’s get beyond this.

Joanne Kelley   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Barack Obama has changed the debate about race this way: We are judging him by the content of his character, not the color of his skin.

Joanne Kelley
Boston, Massachusetts

Chinyere   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

People would like to believe race is no longer an issue in America but sadly, it still is. That said, I think the support for Obama from all races and both genders is promising! I think the support for Obama is telling of how much the country is in trouble and the fact that people are willing to put personal prejudices aside and vote for a candidate that they believe will do what’s best for the majority of middle class America.

brandon   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Jack, as an obama supporter, and faithful viewer of cnn. it has dawned on me that no matter what obama does, or how much he brings race relations closer. Politicians and the media will always bring up the race card. So in a way it sort of diminishes the point he is trying to make, because once you put it out there the difference in race it does nothing but divide this country

Essie in NC   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

I don’t think Obama’s race has been an issue at all. Color is not what comes to my mind when i see him. What I see is hope, change and opportunity.

silver18   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Jesse Jackson and the Rev. Al Sharpton are deeply invested in keeping America divided on racial issues. This is the only thing keeping their names in the spotlight. Without such tension, they would fade away.

Karen L.   January 7th, 2008 5:16 pm ET

What debate about race? The only ones beating the “race” drum to death are the Corporate owned News media! The vast majority of Americans are less interested in skin color and more interested in nominating someone who is extremely intelligent, yet also exhibits genuine feelings of concern/compassion, is able to work (as in negotiate with words, not fear and killing) well with people from ALL walks of life. He treats ALL people equally respectful, as was intended by the US Constitution!

I feel “Iowans” have spoken for the majority of us who are sooo weary and tired of being treated more like sheep who follow than educated, intelligent people capable of think for ourselves. Americans are finally finding their voice. The support for Barack Obama indicates that those never ending “polls” constantly shoved in our faces are NOT a true representation of the voting majority — THANK GOD! ( I’ve never been polled) There are more people in the US who are seriously struggling to survive than there are extremely wealthy.

Why don’t you ask the question: “How many of you feel your vote will actually be counted?” That there won’t be more “voter fraud”! Why don’t supposed news shows on major networks cover and expose the corruption of our voting machines/system? A Kansas Republican official actually bragged that they are actively still conducting “voter caging” in that state recently! And/or, how many of you feel we will even have an election.

Jim Blevins   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

While it is hard to know what is inside a person. Obama seems to regard himself as a person — not a black person. That goes a very long ways toward getting others to regard him as a person (color irrelevant). Hopefully that idea will gain acceptance as a result of is candidacy.

G. Somerville   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Many people — not just African Americans — vote based on the facts. My financial condition and personal realities are not tied to Rev. Jackson, Rev. Shaprton, Mr. Denzel Washington, Mr. Quincy Jones, or others referred to in Mr. Cafferty’s recent comments. Please give us credit for making substantive decisions about who we support with our power to cast our vote.

Antar Ibn-Stanford   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Hello Jack,

Most African-Americans who grew up in the 60s realized then–and it hasn’t changed–that race is not merely about skin color. It’’s also about culture and identity. Also, there has always been token blacks acceptable to whites.

Antar Ibn-Stanford

Mike   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Jack,
What it changes is how the Jesse Jackson’s and Al Sharpton’s were wrong about what America thinks about race. They would have you believe that America is against blacks. Barack Obama is a fresh perspective on how to run this country. His race has absolutely nothing to do with it. He is educated, articulate, and honest. Those are traits that are hard to find anymore in modern politics. I just wish Edwards would be his running mate if he gets the Democratic ticket. I’m a Republican but if the Democrats get the White House at least I would be content with an Obama/Edwards victory.

James S. Lenon   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Race will matter as much as always until the day that black Americans no longer criticize Obama and others for being “too white.”

Nancy   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Barack Obama is EQUALLY half white and half African-American, so why is he called ‘Black’? Isn’t that flaming racism in itself? His success stems from the fact that people are looking beyond race embracing his message of change and unity and, that in itself, gives me great hope for the future of this nation.

Nancy

Steven   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

I haven’t really thought much about race, as it relates to the Obama candidacy. I’m a Clinton supporter. However, if getting him elected would mean pushing a racist rabble rouser like Al Sharpton deep into the oblivion he deserves, I might be persuaded to vote for him. It is refreshing to have a black man (okay, 1/2 black) on the national stage without blaming the rest of the world for all of black society’s problems.

Oliver in Louisiana   January 7th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

Having beena lifelong resident of Louisiana, I have seen our country grow from a hateful, unaccepting place to a more tolerant society. I feel that Barack Obama’s success thus far will shatter the image of the “angry black politician” and aid in the progression of African Americans in American government.

Dave Ma   January 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

For the better. He is no Al Sharpton, and if he wins Sharpton, Jackson and all the others who have a vested interest in fomenting racial issues and live for the next faux pa by a white guy will be out of business. Then we will have a better chance at the “Dream” King spoke about so many years ago.

Morgan   January 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

For to long in this country people have been seen only as their race. We partition ourselves by supporting only our own. Leaders of the past have played on our differences. Obama truely shows that people in this country can view eachother as people. It is a breakdown of race relations as we know it and the next step for Americans.

objection21   January 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

Jack-

For proof that race is still an issue, consider this: people questioned until Iowa if America was “ready for” a Black president as if somehow Blacks are incapable of being at least as horrendous as their white political counterparts. I don’t think Obama’s success says or proves much. The fact that the question even needs to be asked means that we are not nearly as evolved as we’d like to believe. Many other countries have had female leaders and black leaders but here in America it’s still a novelty. Obama is acceptable to all because of the dire situation left by the Bush administration and because he doesn’t use his race as a crutch and in fact has had to steal Black votes from Hillary because even Blacks weren’t sure that a black man had the chops to run the country further into the ground.

Chantell   January 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

I beleive this could be the beginning of a change in race relations in America. Out with the old way of thinking (black man inferior) and in the with the new ( all people are created equal). Iowa looked past race and decided to choose the most qualified candidate.
Chantell
Hnesville, Ga

Jozette   January 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

Barack has the best of both worlds so it negates the need to discuss his race. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will beat that drum all the way to their graves! It gives them something to march about. Wherever there is a black person in trouble…right or wrong…those two will show up like twiddley dee and twiddley dum. They both need to get a life!

Scott MacDonald   January 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

Jack, For years I have prayed for a black Presidential candidate that did not shove race down our throats. My prayers have been answered in Barack Obama. I can’t wait to see how this affects the negative backward looking remarks of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

Roscoe   January 7th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

If Obama loses, nothing changes. If Obama wins, then we’re living in a brand new world. No more conspiracy theorist, elitist and poverty pimps to keep the Nation divided.

Jessie Meehan   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Barack Obama is in a unique place - his father is from Kenya, his mother from Kansas. Many will see the color of his skin first and foremost, instead of looking deeper and seeing what he truely represents - the bringing together of different sides whether in a political, racial, gender or age aspect. While I am undecided between Obama and Clinton, I do believe because of Obama’s background and his character he would ultimately be the better candidate to bring together all Americans, despite our many differences. He is a well-respected man all around.

Melissa in VA   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

For once he speaks the truth-”you’re the truth and I’m riding it.” Oh is he ever. Obama’s frightening surge says nothing about “race relations” in this country. It says we’re afraid of change. Years of grumbling about W., his lack of IQ points or a spine so what do we do? Embrace the guy with no platform, no opinions (other than all the other candidates are evil and worthless when they point out his shortfalls) and no clue of how to get America back on track. We’re still suckered in by the insincere plastic smile and handshake. Apparently the only way to win an election this year is to have no passion, no opinions and lots of make-up for that perma-smile.

Frank in Chicago   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

It shows that racism in politics is over, just like this election is already over. There’s a reason Obama and Huckabee won in Iowa and will continue to win up until they battle each other for the White House. Politics is no longer about historical voting records or future promises. We are entering the age of the philosopher rulers. Statistical politics is over. Usher in the new era of politics where all that matters is the ability to think in the here and now.

Janie   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

The fact that Obama has become the “media darling” shows that race relations are doing well, but if is fair game to put sexists comments on air. Obama has not received difficult questions and no investigative reporting on anything about him.
The pundits on CNN are right to keep the race issue from becoming a problem, but look at what these same men have done to Senator Clinton.
Her laugh has been called a cackle. Her voice has been called shrill. These are attacks women understand.
Senator Clinton’s pant suits, her hair style and now her honest emotions are attacked.
I know this comment will not appear on air, because it supports Hillary. Cnn doesn’t allow that.

natalie   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Obama’s success may finally and definitively prove that race simply doesn’t matter. He doesn’t wallow in it. He doesn’t attack others because of it. He doesn’t apologize for it. He simply IS a candidate with ideas we all should hear and consider.

A. Buch   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Race relations should be obsolete now in this country. Those that believe in achieving more than the usual will never be bothered with the race relation dilemma. Obama has always spoken out on Universal subjects. The reason Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have always been losing in politics is because they have always somehow brought race as a priority issue. Obama realizes that there is no need to do this.

Glen Rock   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Barack Obama’s success has made at least one conservative media outlet — Fox News — interested in the opinions of Black celebrities.

Jordan - Cedar Rapids, IA   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

I’m not even a native Iowan and I’m sick of hearing about how WHITE the state is. Yes, most of Iowans are white, but people who really think the state is full of people who make an important decision like who to vote for to be President on something like Race or Gender are just ignorant and, honestly, part of the problem with race relations.

Iowans actually get to meet candidate face to face and TALK to them about issues. Silly us. But I suppose when the rest of the country makes THEIR decision solely based on 30 second sound bytes, you have to figure in things like Race and Gender when making an “informed” decision.

Relwan   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Obama isn’t really changing anything; people like him for him, not for his race. Race relations are still poor in this country, but the problem is just not as much an issue as the likes of Al Sharpton would have us believe. Americans have refused to support Jackson and Sharpton, not because of race, but because they would suck as presidents. And as for the opinons of black celebrities, it baffles me that what the chairman of BET thinks is supposed to affect my decision in any way. what am I, a puppet?

Ryan M   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

It speaks to the the wave that has gripped this Country. The next generation is speaking out. The self proclaimed “Reagan Children” won’t settle for a strict formation along party lines. We will select the man or woman to be our next President on merits and nothing else. Whether a woman, an African-American, or a Mormon the next President and those to follow will be selected by us, the men and women ages 25-35, the next greatest generation.

M   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

It’s changed in the sense that nobody cares anymore! I don’t care what my President looks like, I care about what my President stands for. There are so many things to consider when choosing a candidate, and I think things like race and gender are at the bottom of the barrel for the majority of voters. People are smarter than that.

G. Robinson   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Barack Obama is a human being first and then a black man. Let’s remeber that before we spend the next 11 months go bananas becasue he is African-American. If anything Barack Obama will hopefully give my brothers and sisters the wake up call they need to realize that we can do ANYTHING we set out to do. I do not believe however he can change race relations because most racists are individuals who have an embedded ideology about certain races and no one - not even Holy scriptures can turn them from their racists attitudes. All I have to say is GO SENATOR OBAMA - whether you win or lose you have allowed me to realize OUR HOPE AS A PEOPLE AND AS A BLACK WOMAN and I THANK YOU AND I THANK GOD FOR YOU!!!!!

Ken   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Jack, my friend, as soon as Hillary crumbles (without any doubt) Obama will bring out the support of all the celebs you mentioned. They just have to make sure that Hillary is toast first.

Mike   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Jack,

Barack Obama, while profoundly eloquent, did not need to use words to play up the fact that he was flying in the face of precedent. His words have echoed with many Americans on issues such as poverty, faith, corruption, hope, and change, but he doesn’t need to throw in “oh, by the way, I’m black, so that’s change!” Black candidates before him made it KNOWN that they were black, and SMART, and POWERFUL. Obama silently lived it, not quialifying himself as anything other than a man with a mission.

Mike
Topsfield, MA

Ruth   January 7th, 2008 5:19 pm ET

Racism may not be as much of a political issue that it has been, but it is still something many deal with on a daily basis, myself included. But I do believe that this is showing that race or ethnicity is become much less emphasized in politics than in recent years. Although it was sort of disappointing to see on that interview, that a lot of the people coming out to support Obama were just there because of his celebrity, rather than the issues, it is good to see that America is finally looking at the content of the man rather than other superficial aspects.

Tosha   January 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

Personally I don’t understand why so much emphasis is being put on Obama being black and Clinton being a woman. What ever happened to wanting the best person for the job? Our country is in turmoil right now and it seems as if a person being black or a woman is more important everyday. When Bush was running for office no one ever mentioned how many men were running, just the topics that made since(even though it wasn’t a fair race), but the issues being discussed were important not their race or gender. I think that we need to focus more on what the candidates can do to relieve this country and how fast they can get it done.

Chems   January 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

Jack, being black and having travelled in many Europeens country, I can tell you that with few exceptions, every black has a decent shot at life in this country. And America is the greatest country on earth. Obama has worked hard and he is getting the reward he deserves. I am black, and I personnally don’t pay any attention to Jessee and Al Sharpton. They are sending the wrong message to the black youth. There is only one thing that pay off and that is hard work and then you can HOPE

Chems,

Alexandria, VA

Rachel, Storm Lake, IA   January 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

Obama’s win in Iowa is especially significant when viewed in conjunction with the tremendous turnout of young voters that accompanied the victory. To me this shows that young voters aren’t interested in the ideas of the old school when it comes to politics or race, and are instead more interested in the future of the country that they will inherit. These voters have chosen the candidate that has the ability to build the consensus to bring change, and the color of his skin means nothing to them. This gives me tremendous hope for the future of this country and the ability of my generation to look at the broader picture, rather than at petty differences like race.

chuck in Md.   January 7th, 2008 5:20 pm ET

Obama is my choice for President. He seems like an honest person who will try to unite the country. Although, I don’t believe that as long as people like Al Sharpton are making their livings by dividing Americans, will anything change.

Nate   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

It’s been nearly 20 years since I have felt a national black leader’s presence. As a 42 year old black man myself, Obama has already had an impact on me. I am beginning to believe what I have always told myself, I am not a second class citizen and I actually can be anything I want to be.

With each Obama victory this nation heals, only internally and externally as well. I am full of pride and patriotism, once again.

Pat Shaw   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

I was in my 20s when a Senator named Kennedy lifted us to a new self awareness and made us not only feel better about ourselves, but about our nation as well. His “Ask not…” inspired us all. I’m 74 now and I get the same feeling when I listen to Senator Obama. He lifts us up and makes us feel as though we really can be better than we are. Why was a one-term governor of Texas more qualified to be President than a well-seasoned first term US Senator with years of state-elected experience and a vision that isboth motivational and inspirational? Listening to Obama, I know I can fly!

Rose   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

First of all, Obama is NOT Black. He is bi-racial. His mother is White. This allows him to see the black culture and white culture in America … one reason he transcends the race card. He grew up looking black and living with his white mother being accepted or rejected for reasons other than his race, yet being accepted or rejected based on being “a half breed”. It’s a different culture when one is multi-racial whether one has African, Asian, Native American, or Caucasian blood. I know, I’m a multi-racial American woman.

Richard, Mckinney Texas   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

What change about race? I am the same color today as I was yesterday and so are you Jack. You honestly think because a black man is running for president it will change things? America had a black man run for president years ago by the name of Jessie Jackson who had a lot more black support then Obama who is not black by the way he is of mixed race. Obama’s biggest problems are he is young ,unproven, inexperienced and can’t change his middle name which is “Hussein” and that, this day and age is what will hurt him the most in America.

Ron HATCH   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Jack,

I hope this ends the media obsession about race realtions in this country so that your efforts can be focused on reporting about the issues that could lead to our demise such as illegal immigration, medicare, medicaid and social secuirty.

Ron Richmond VA

Joseph Obajolu   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Obama will not be supported by most black Americans (super stars and co) until they know the whites will put him in the white house. Obama is not looked at as a black american, but rather a foreigner who happens to have an American birth certificate and American passport. With all due respect, the so called black Americans (people with family that were here during the civil right movement), have a problem about other blacks coming to share the goodies of America with them without their family not going through the pain of slavery.

Beverly   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

The only ones who seem to be using the race card is the media IMO. NO one in the media has investigated Obama like they have Hillary! Why not? Are you afraid of being called racist? Don’t you think the American people have the right to know all about Obama, his past and his politics? Or is it a woman hating thing with CNN that every moment of Hillary has to be broadcast 24/7 with a “isn’t she horrible” slant and Obama gets a free pass? Seems to me Obama’s answer to the drivers licenses for illegals was as bad if not worse than what Hillary had said a debate before, but he was not endlessly covered in the news for the next week with ridicule like she was. MSNBC practically has coronated Obama already as the second coming–I see CNN is not far behind!! The only ones I can see who have a problem with race is the media, the public can see he is black, and the media is afraid of it!

Kiko   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

As long as the presidential nominee is not named Bush, I could care less about the race of the nominee. He can be black, white, yellow, green, or blue; it doesn’t matter as long as we get this meatball out of the whitehouse.

David Krause   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

For a number of years there have been several African-American politicians breaking through at the local & regional levels without a racial focus in their campaigns. Here in Seattle, for example, we’ve had former mayor Norm Rice and current King County Executive Ron Sims. Now, Mr. Obama is bringing that same element to the national scene, and is proving successful. This “new” wave succeeds because the candidates position themselves as people, not white people or black people, but people. That is the most basic step needed for getting beyond the racial divide.

James   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Cafferty, Obama is a Black Man trying to Steal More Chain than He can Carry!

jane s   January 7th, 2008 5:21 pm ET

Ask yourself a question I have asked myself Jack . Is this country more ready for a black man to be President or a woman? It’s a no brainer. Don’t talk to me about race when in fact gender is the real elephant in this political “room” Now Hillary being critized for being emotional when all the press could do for months was point out her lack of warmth or personal touch. You know Jack, I adore you and have for years but I implore you to stand back and take a hard look at what is really going on here. Obama has been given a free pass…the cowards afraid to press this man on his policies to see if they have any substance…his race has given him this untouchable protection because no one wants to appear like a bigot but the gloves have been off from beginning when it came Hillary.

David   January 7th, 2008 5:22 pm ET

Jack
I run a multi-million dollar facility and instill in my employees that it does not matter the color of your skin nor your race that matters but that you are judged not so much by your words but rather your actions. I happen tobe a proud Independent for the past 12 years and will make a decision on election day. Is Lou listening?
David from CT

Lecia Shorter