Comments on: North Korea responds to President Bush? http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/ Tell Jack how you really feel Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:00:35 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Dan http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-9287 Dan Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:07:25 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-9287 She's right Jack.Your country needs experience asap. Barak should be vice president for your excitement if thats what you need. Between Bush and Obama there's Hilary and the best adviser Bill Clinton. Remember Jack most of you were for the Irak war don;t blame her for her vote on Irak She's right Jack.Your country needs experience asap. Barak should be vice president for your excitement if thats what you need. Between Bush and Obama there's Hilary and the best adviser Bill Clinton. Remember Jack most of you were for the Irak war don;t blame her for her vote on Irak

]]> By: Ajay Jain http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-6101 Ajay Jain Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:06:05 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-6101 Jack, The "critical juncture" in North Korean politics is not nuclear anymore because by giving the AXIS-OF-EVIL State of the Union address our esteemed "President" Bush pushed North Korea into exploding the nuclear bomb and proving deterrence unlike Saddam Hussein! Thanks President Bush for undoing Bill Clinton's hard work, heavy lifting you can never do. The "critical juncture" is now Dubya's legacy that he is looking for in every corner of the world in his last year!!! Middle East! Maybe the Palestine State!! Who better can create the state: a weak US President, a weak Israel Prime Minister, and a weak Arab proped up leader Abbas Abu Mazam!! Maybe PEACE with North Korea! Dubya might as well leave the US with problems in weak agreements. After all we have Dr Rice an ace diplomat who shuttling burning jet oil to save Dubya's legacy!!! Foreign Policy!!! In trying to CREATE a legacy Bush 43 might leave a mess form 44 to clean or even longer. The CLINTONS are coming! We need Hillary44 in 2009. Go Hillary44 08! http://hillaryis44.org/ Jack,

The "critical juncture" in North Korean politics is not nuclear anymore because by giving the AXIS-OF-EVIL State of the Union address our esteemed "President" Bush pushed North Korea into exploding the nuclear bomb and proving deterrence unlike Saddam Hussein! Thanks President Bush for undoing Bill Clinton's hard work, heavy lifting you can never do.

The "critical juncture" is now Dubya's legacy that he is looking for in every corner of the world in his last year!!! Middle East! Maybe the Palestine State!! Who better can create the state: a weak US President, a weak Israel Prime Minister, and a weak Arab proped up leader Abbas Abu Mazam!!

Maybe PEACE with North Korea! Dubya might as well leave the US with problems in weak agreements. After all we have Dr Rice an ace diplomat who shuttling burning jet oil to save Dubya's legacy!!! Foreign Policy!!!

In trying to CREATE a legacy Bush 43 might leave a mess form 44 to clean or even longer.

The CLINTONS are coming! We need Hillary44 in 2009.

Go Hillary44 08! http://hillaryis44.org/

]]> By: Paul http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3780 Paul Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:01:28 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3780 Transparency is a great beginning. The interesting part will be how No. Korea works with the US's new administration to continue the progress that they state is in their best interest. Or will they use this to reposition themselves to create another opportunity to rebel again. Transparency is a great beginning. The interesting part will be how No. Korea works with the US's new administration to continue the progress that they state is in their best interest. Or will they use this to reposition themselves to create another opportunity to rebel again.

]]> By: Andrew http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3198 Andrew Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:12:46 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3198 This demonstrates to other asian nations, especially south korea, that the united states can employ other weapons besides guns and men. This demonstrates to other asian nations, especially south korea, that the united states can employ other weapons besides guns and men.

]]> By: Sean Halpin http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3181 Sean Halpin Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:55:52 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3181 For anyone who does not take North Korea's nuclear threat seriously I would suggest researching Kim Jong-il's personal involvement in the espionage campaigns North Korea was engaged in the 1980s of which Kim Jong-il played a major role. Although I think diplomacy is a vital essence to establishing peace and stability let us not forget that our virtues cannot be compromised. It takes two to cooperate and one needs to lead in example. Reaching a settlement with North Korea cannot be confused with appeasement. Never should the two be confused because both countries should be willing to make concessions on behalf of the security and welfare of the world. North Korea needs to ensure that it does not support terrorist organizations as a prerequisite to talks; making the assumption that every country is virtuous and pragmatic is a big assumption to make. Let countries demostrate first their willingness to cooperate and then talks should procede after such actions are made by trading representatives. Bush's reaching out to Kim jong-il should not be mistaken as a mislead of faith but rather it should be understood as a preliminary measure to serious taljs being discussed between the two countries. Although Bush's recent conduct seems to convey serious intentions of reaching a settlement a reciprocal response is necessary from North Korea for such talks to be taken seriously. Cooperation is a two way street. For anyone who does not take North Korea's nuclear threat seriously I would suggest researching Kim Jong-il's personal involvement in the espionage campaigns North Korea was engaged in the 1980s of which Kim Jong-il played a major role. Although I think diplomacy is a vital essence to establishing peace and stability let us not forget that our virtues cannot be compromised. It takes two to cooperate and one needs to lead in example. Reaching a settlement with North Korea cannot be confused with appeasement. Never should the two be confused because both countries should be willing to make concessions on behalf of the security and welfare of the world. North Korea needs to ensure that it does not support terrorist organizations as a prerequisite to talks; making the assumption that every country is virtuous and pragmatic is a big assumption to make. Let countries demostrate first their willingness to cooperate and then talks should procede after such actions are made by trading representatives. Bush's reaching out to Kim jong-il should not be mistaken as a mislead of faith but rather it should be understood as a preliminary measure to serious taljs being discussed between the two countries. Although Bush's recent conduct seems to convey serious intentions of reaching a settlement a reciprocal response is necessary from North Korea for such talks to be taken seriously. Cooperation is a two way street.

]]> By: C. Farrell, Houston, Tx http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3170 C. Farrell, Houston, Tx Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:48:16 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3170 You bet there will be a change, but what is the trade off here? With Bush's legacy at risk and weakness in Bush's diplomacy, Americans needs to be very concerned. Diplomacy is great, but a trade off to change one's legacy can prove to be very dangerous. You bet there will be a change, but what is the trade off here? With Bush's legacy at risk and weakness in Bush's diplomacy, Americans needs to be very concerned. Diplomacy is great, but a trade off to change one's legacy can prove to be very dangerous.

]]> By: David http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3165 David Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:20:24 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3165 When dealing with a dictator and regime as mercurial, reckless and just plain nuts as Kim Jong Il and his gang tact and protocal are essential in preventing situations from getting out of control. North Korea behaving rationally, however, is only half the story. The other part is perhaps that our own Yokel-in-Chief may finally have learned to act like a President himself. When dealing with a dictator and regime as mercurial, reckless and just plain nuts as Kim Jong Il and his gang tact and protocal are essential in preventing situations from getting out of control. North Korea behaving rationally, however, is only half the story. The other part is perhaps that our own Yokel-in-Chief may finally have learned to act like a President himself.

]]> By: rob http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3159 rob Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:59:58 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3159 Communist North Korea, played Jimmy Carter like the fool he is. George Bush, with the precidents of the past, should show greater caution, so that he does not follow in a line up of fools. America is too short sighted, thinking only of today. Trying to get the North Korean's to do what we would like them to do is one thing, but what they are really up to is the real question? And as for Bill Clinton, selling us out to the Chinesse hasn't been a deterent for strength in the Pacific, regardless of whether y2k gave Bill Clinton any real reason to pretend he had a successful presidency! Re-imagining history will never be a clinton legacy ... Communist North Korea, played Jimmy Carter like the fool he is. George Bush, with the precidents of the past, should show greater caution, so that he does not follow in a line up of fools. America is too short sighted, thinking only of today. Trying to get the North Korean's to do what we would like them to do is one thing, but what they are really up to is the real question?

And as for Bill Clinton, selling us out to the Chinesse hasn't been a deterent for strength in the Pacific, regardless of whether y2k gave Bill Clinton any real reason to pretend he had a successful presidency! Re-imagining history will never be a clinton legacy ...

]]> By: robert http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3154 robert Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:14:04 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3154 who cares we'reall screwwed anyway who cares we'reall screwwed anyway

]]> By: Jeff http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3153 Jeff Sun, 16 Dec 2007 03:06:41 +0000 http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/14/north-korea-responds-to-president-bush/#comment-3153 BUSH "KING OF LOOSE CANNONS": Can't we get this guy out of office BEFORE THE SHIP completely sinks? Next time ...let's nominate a president with a pay range of $25 to 100K per Yr! So we can benefit from what is truely needed in this country!.. And not let the wealthy ..like... Bush jr... treat the American people like: ....... PEASANTS AND CANNON FODDER! Disgusted army veteran! ..who tried to make America a better place! BUSH "KING OF LOOSE CANNONS":

Can't we get this guy out of office BEFORE THE SHIP completely sinks?

Next time ...let's nominate a president with a pay range of $25 to 100K per Yr!
So we can benefit from what is truely needed in this country!..

And not let the wealthy ..like... Bush jr... treat the American people like:
....... PEASANTS AND CANNON FODDER!

Disgusted army veteran! ..who tried to make America a better place!

]]>